On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 4:26 AM, Vinzent Steinberg<vinzent.steinb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > 2009/8/21 Aaron S. Meurer <asmeu...@gmail.com> >> >> On Aug 20, 2009, at 4:20 PM, Vinzent Steinberg wrote: >> > Don't know whether it makes sense to add this trivial special case. >> I don't see how that is a special case, but I don't like adding >> special cases anyway. > > I just expected for f(x).diff(x, n) = f(x) the solution C1*exp(x), this is > the special case I meant. > > Andy Ray Terrel wrote: >> >> So I'm +1 with this to be merged in. It is a lot of code and I >> haven't gone over every line but it is well documented and the tests >> seem to be covering most of the code. > > I agree with Andy, I'd prefer checkodesol() to return the error only instead > of the current tuple, but I'm fine with that too, so I'm also +1. > > Ondrej, you're an differential equations expert, please have a look, so we > can push this in. :)
I will have a look tonight. Vinzent, you are ok too with this branch going in as is? If so, I'll review too and if I don't find any showstoppers, push it in. Ondrej --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-patches" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy-patches@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy-patches+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-patches?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
