2009/8/21 Aaron S. Meurer <asmeu...@gmail.com> > On Aug 20, 2009, at 4:20 PM, Vinzent Steinberg wrote: > > Don't know whether it makes sense to add this trivial special case. > I don't see how that is a special case, but I don't like adding > special cases anyway.
I just expected for f(x).diff(x, n) = f(x) the solution C1*exp(x), this is the special case I meant. Andy Ray Terrel wrote: > So I'm +1 with this to be merged in. It is a lot of code and I > haven't gone over every line but it is well documented and the tests > seem to be covering most of the code. I agree with Andy, I'd prefer checkodesol() to return the error only instead of the current tuple, but I'm fine with that too, so I'm also +1. Ondrej, you're an differential equations expert, please have a look, so we can push this in. :) Vinzent --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-patches" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy-patches@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy-patches+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-patches?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
