I just fixed py.test, the results are attached. They should be more
useful that bin/test's results. Note that there are some failures
related to py.test.
Vinzent
2010/4/30 Aaron S. Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com:
The failures are 64-bit only:
32-bit:
The failures are 64-bit only:
32-bit:
___ sympy/utilities/tests/test_code_quality.py:test_implicit_imports ___
File
On Mar 26, 8:38 pm, Vinzent Steinberg
vinzent.steinb...@googlemail.com wrote:
I just tried to review the commits before the 'quartz' commit, I hope this
is to be reviewed, if not, please create a new branch with only the commits
to be reviewed. The 1766s and the 1766_s branch need to be
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 12:54 AM, smichr smi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 26, 8:38 pm, Vinzent Steinberg
vinzent.steinb...@googlemail.com wrote:
I just tried to review the commits before the 'quartz' commit, I hope this
is to be reviewed, if not, please create a new branch with only the
I just tried to review the commits before the 'quartz' commit, I hope this
is to be reviewed, if not, please create a new branch with only the commits
to be reviewed. The 1766s and the 1766_s branch need to be rebased on
master.
So I'm getting these failures:
I think that minor test failures are not too big of a deal for
intermediate commits. It is important that isympy works in each
intermediate commit, in case you need to bisect, and that there are no
whitespace issues, because git complains about them while rebasing and
if you have the
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Aaron S. Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that minor test failures are not too big of a deal for intermediate
commits. It is important that isympy works in each intermediate commit, in
case you need to bisect, and that there are no whitespace issues,
why did you remove the following tests (sympy/core/tests/test_arit.py):
- assert list((I*pi).atoms(NumberSymbol)) == [pi]
- assert sorted((I*pi).atoms(NumberSymbol, I)) == \
- sorted((I*pi).atoms(I,NumberSymbol)) == [pi, I]
There must be a better way to find this...sorry, I
I'll reply to the initial questions in a bit.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy-patc...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
On Mar 5, 12:04 pm, smichr smi...@gmail.com wrote:
This is False for reasons I am trying to track down. The problem
doesn't exist in master
Correction: the problem exists in master. (The original raising-
expression wasn't causing a problem in master but was in 1766, but the
underlying
ok, all issues have been resolved (except perhaps for an error that
showed up for asmeurer but not for me which I tried to fix but it will
take someone else to test it--a test in test_ode triggered it).
All doctests and tests of the current 1766 branch pass for me.
--
You received this message
2010/3/4 Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz:
$ ./setup.py test
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ./setup.py, line 33, in module
import sympy
File /home/ondrej/repos/sympy/sympy/__init__.py, line 29, in module
from concrete import *
File
OK, let's try again...it's repushed and no failures show here. I am,
however, trying to track down something that showed up in the
polynomial decomposition question that I posed recently.
###
t = -sqrt(2)*(1-sqrt(2))
print sqrt(t).is_real == sqrt(t.expand()).is_real
###
This is False for reasons
13 matches
Mail list logo
