[ stripped Cc line ]
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 16:51 +0100, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
My 2 cents... Do the byte counting. Look at the headers of
pretty much any successful protocol (TCP, IP, UDP, etc) -
they all specify length of payload. Special character
sequence is really a hack IMO!
Bazsi,
Agreed, let's go for octet-counting. How would that look like? Two
octets before every message? That would limit message size to 64k, is
that sufficient? (I personally say it is, messages larger
than 64k would
potentially mean that they cannot be held in memory)
there is the good,
Baszi,
I see the following possible upsides of using some kind of framing:
* byte-counted messages, effectively allowing the use of the full
character set
* application layer acknowledgements, avoid losing messages sitting in
the TCP socket buffers without knowing that they were not really
]
Preliminarysyslog-transport-tls document - issue 3
Hi,
This is an issue that we need to discuss. I've had some
discussions with various people on this subject who's
opinions I trust. They also suggest that we do have 2
options as Rainer states. Let me describe this in a bit more detail
messages - RE: [Syslog]
Preliminarysyslog-transport-tls document - issue 3
Hi,
This is an issue that we need to discuss. I've had some
discussions with various people on this subject who's
opinions I trust. They also suggest that we do have 2
options as Rainer states. Let me
