On Sun, 03.04.11 13:10, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
I can write to /run/user/michal in this way I can fill the entire free
tmpfs space which is not good from my POV.
Yupp, this is trivially fixable by placing another tmpfs on /run/user,
which can be done by installing a
When the system is rebooted with SELinux enabled after being disabled
temporarily, automatic relabeling is supposed to happen. This is currently
broken in Fedora 15.
/etc/rc.sysinit used to do that by touching /.autorelabel when SELinux was
disabled. The code still exists in fedora-autorelabel,
Several condition types were missing their strings, they were showing as
(null) in systemctl dump.
Indentation was missing too.
---
src/condition.c |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/condition.c b/src/condition.c
index b404b49..5ab77d8 100644
---
They only differ in the condition type, otherwise the code is identical.
Replace them with a more generic config_parse_condition_string().
---
src/load-fragment.c | 44 ++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git
Using ConditionSELinux a unit can depend on the SELinux state:
disabled, permissive, enforcing
A bool argument is also accepted:
no = disabled
yes = permissive | enforcing
I'd like to use this feature for a unit that creates /.autorelabel if
SELinux is disabled, to ensure a relabel is done
---
man/systemd.unit.xml | 12
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/man/systemd.unit.xml b/man/systemd.unit.xml
index 47ddece..e255f7a 100644
--- a/man/systemd.unit.xml
+++ b/man/systemd.unit.xml
@@ -565,6 +565,7 @@
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 16:22, Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com wrote:
ConditionSELinux=disabled
Wouldn't it be nicer to have ConditionSecurity=SELinux, like we have
ConditionVirtualization=kvm? You never know what people invent next
year. :)
ConditionPathExists=!/.autorelabel
This flag
On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 16:38:35 +0200 Kay Sievers wrote:
Wouldn't it be nicer to have ConditionSecurity=SELinux, like we have
ConditionVirtualization=kvm? You never know what people invent next
year. :)
OK, why not.
I guess just having ConditionSecurity=SELinux and
ConditionSecurity=!SELinux would
Hello all
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Albert Strasheim full...@gmail.com wrote:
pam_loginuid(sshd:session): set_loginuid failed
This one is caused by:
32open(/proc/self/loginuid, O_WRONLY|O_TRUNC|O_NOFOLLOW) = 4
32write(4, 0, 1) = -1 EPERM (Operation not permitted)
This replaces the previous ConditionSELinux series.
Kay suggested ConditionSecurity would be nicer and more general.
---
Michal Schmidt (4):
man: document ConditionSecurity
condition: add ConditionSecurity
load-fragment: unify config_parse_condition_{kernel,virt}
Using ConditionSecurity a unit can depend on a security module being
enabled/disabled. For now the only recognized security module is SELinux.
I'd like to use this feature for a unit that creates /.autorelabel if
SELinux is disabled, to ensure a relabel is done automatically when the
system is
2011/4/3 Florian Kriener flor...@kriener.org:
On Sunday 03 April 2011 18:27:53 you wrote:
I am still playing around with systemd and try to somehow convince
it to boot again, after the debian package stopped working (dbus
broke somehow when booting with systemd). My problem with the
On Sunday 03 April 2011 19:16:25 Michael Biebl wrote:
Getting a log of booting with systemd.log_level=debug would be a good
start.
Ahh, I should have mentioned, that I you can find that in dmesg.log,
sorry.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
On Sunday 03 April 2011 19:38:57 Michael Biebl wrote:
You seem to have a mix of file in /usr/local and /
Get rid of the local installation and start with a clean installation
of the Debian package.
That doesn't work either as mentioned in the first mail, it fails with a
different problem
]] Michal Schmidt
Hi,
| We should really stop having flag files like this outside
| of well-defined directories which exist for that purpose.
|
| /.autorelabel is not new. Fedora's /etc/rc.sysinit has been doing
| this since May 2005. I am only trying to prevent the loss of this
| feature.
On Sun, 03.04.11 18:16, Michal Schmidt (mschm...@redhat.com) wrote:
This replaces the previous ConditionSELinux series.
Kay suggested ConditionSecurity would be nicer and more general.
Thanks. Applied.
(I changed the SELinux spelling to selinux however and made things
case-sensitive, since
On Sun, 03.04.11 15:55, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
W dniu 3 kwietnia 2011 12:54 użytkownik Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de napisał:
On Sun, 03.04.11 13:10, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
I can write to /run/user/michal in this way I can
On Sun, 03.04.11 10:38, Bruno Wolff III (br...@wolff.to) wrote:
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 15:55:11 +0100,
Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com wrote:
I see no other way out here because tmpfs does not support quota.
What about having /run/user/whoever sym link to /home/user/.run ?
No, not
On Sat, 02.04.11 14:28, Albert Strasheim (full...@gmail.com) wrote:
Ideally, we'd like to achieve this without touching the configuration
of the developer's system itself, since they might still be running
Fedora 14 without systemd, or might have built systemd directly from
git. This should
W dniu 3 kwietnia 2011 22:39 użytkownik Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de napisał:
On Sun, 03.04.11 13:54, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
On Sun, 03.04.11 13:10, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
I can write to /run/user/michal in this way I can
On Sun, 03.04.11 18:01, Albert Strasheim (full...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hello all
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Albert Strasheim full...@gmail.com wrote:
pam_loginuid(sshd:session): set_loginuid failed
This one is caused by:
32open(/proc/self/loginuid, O_WRONLY|O_TRUNC|O_NOFOLLOW)
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 23:05:52 +0200,
Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course it will be the best solution. But I doubt it will happen in
a next few weeks - so some temporary workaround for F15 would be
appreciated. It seems to me that this is a too serious problem to
On Sun, 03.04.11 23:05, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
W dniu 3 kwietnia 2011 22:39 użytkownik Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de napisał:
On Sun, 03.04.11 13:54, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
On Sun, 03.04.11 13:10, Michał Piotrowski
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 23:22:06 +0200,
Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com wrote:
W dniu 3 kwietnia 2011 23:11 użytkownik Bruno Wolff III
br...@wolff.to napisał:
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 23:05:52 +0200,
Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course it will be the best solution.
On Sun, 03.04.11 21:39, Michal Schmidt (mschm...@redhat.com) wrote:
We should really stop having flag files like this outside
of well-defined directories which exist for that purpose.
/.autorelabel is not new. Fedora's /etc/rc.sysinit has been doing
this since May 2005. I am only trying
On Sun, 03.04.11 23:28, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
But for /dev/shm I see no quick fix... do you?
Unfortunately not. No one foresaw that quota support on tmpfs will
someday be useful :)
I think we should fix either both or should wait for the proper fix by
the
2011/4/3 Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de:
On Sun, 03.04.11 23:28, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
But for /dev/shm I see no quick fix... do you?
Unfortunately not. No one foresaw that quota support on tmpfs will
someday be useful :)
I think we should fix either
2011/4/3 Kay Sievers kay.siev...@vrfy.org:
2011/4/3 Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de:
On Sun, 03.04.11 23:28, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
But for /dev/shm I see no quick fix... do you?
Unfortunately not. No one foresaw that quota support on tmpfs will
someday be
On Sunday 03 April 2011 23:44:41 Santi Béjar wrote:
Are those purged? Because if not the init.d files are still there
causing troubles.
$dpkg -l nfs-common
...
rc nfs-common ...
Yes it's purged but it just occured to me that there are a lot of other
init.d files that might cause havok when
W dniu 3 kwietnia 2011 23:35 użytkownik Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de napisał:
On Sun, 03.04.11 23:28, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
But for /dev/shm I see no quick fix... do you?
Unfortunately not. No one foresaw that quota support on tmpfs will
someday be useful
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 00:20, Florian Kriener flor...@kriener.org wrote:
Are there plans to support other distributions like debian in upstream
git wholeheartedly or will systemd git only run properly on fedora? Or
am I lumping packaging and development together here?
It does run on many
Hello all
I just tried to start a socket unit with ListenStream=0 in the
configuration, but this yields the following error:
Failed to issue method call: Unit zero.socket failed to load: Invalid
argument. See system logs and 'systemctl status' for details.
I would expect that it would simply
32 matches
Mail list logo
