On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 02:53:28AM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Ever since the seccomp trick, this is no longer an issue.
> ---
> README | 7 ---
> 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/README b/README
> index b918132..df04cc9 100644
> --- a/README
> +++ b/README
> @@ -83,13 +
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 03:19:09AM +0100, Peeters Simon wrote:
> 2014-02-19 21:03 GMT+01:00 Peeters Simon :
> > 2014-02-19 20:41 GMT+01:00 Kay Sievers :
> >> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Peeters Simon
> >> wrote:
> >>> This weekend I switched 2 of my devices to kdbus. both running a 32bit
> >
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:19 AM, Peeters Simon wrote:
>>> Where is it defined on arm? There is an include in kdbus.h.
>>
>> the problem is that it is "#ifndef __KERNEL__" and I assume that
>> __KERNEL__ gets defined when building the module.
>
> both patches attached (sory, didn't bother to try a
2014-02-19 21:03 GMT+01:00 Peeters Simon :
> 2014-02-19 20:41 GMT+01:00 Kay Sievers :
>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Peeters Simon
>> wrote:
>>> This weekend I switched 2 of my devices to kdbus. both running a 32bit
>>> system (my atom based netbook and a beaglebone black)
>>>
>>> while comp
Hey!
This took a lot longer than we hoped to, due to the dbus transition. But
here it is! systemd 209!
http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/systemd-209.tar.xz
With this new release almost everything is in place for kdbus (modulo
the policy, see below). However, since the kdbus kernel modu
Ret values come second.
---
src/libsystemd/sd-rtnl/rtnl-util.c | 4 ++--
src/libsystemd/sd-rtnl/sd-rtnl.c | 4 ++--
src/libsystemd/sd-rtnl/test-rtnl.c | 8
src/nspawn/nspawn.c| 6 +++---
src/systemd/sd-rtnl.h | 4 ++--
5 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 d
Ever since the seccomp trick, this is no longer an issue.
---
README | 7 ---
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/README b/README
index b918132..df04cc9 100644
--- a/README
+++ b/README
@@ -83,13 +83,6 @@ REQUIREMENTS:
CONFIG_EFI_VARS
CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION
-
2014-02-19 22:01 GMT-03:00 Cristian Rodríguez :
> El 19/02/14 17:13, Kay Sievers escribió:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Marcos Felipe Rasia de Mello
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> systemd-vconsole-setup requires loadkeys/setfont at runtime.
>>>
>>> BTW, since kbd 2.0.0 there is a library for this. Cri
On Thu, 20.02.14 01:21, Uoti Urpala (uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi) wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 17:53 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > Zbigniew suggest we should drop -Wdeclaration-after-statement. I am not
> > convinced that that would be a good idea since generally declarations
> > after sta
El 19/02/14 17:13, Kay Sievers escribió:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Marcos Felipe Rasia de Mello
wrote:
systemd-vconsole-setup requires loadkeys/setfont at runtime.
BTW, since kbd 2.0.0 there is a library for this. Cristian idea should
go to the TODO list ;)
http://lists.opensuse.org/op
Attached.
I also noticed a minor C correctness problem in print_multiline(): if
the last line of message has no newline, then end = message+message_len.
The next loop iteration calculates "pos = end + 1". This means that pos
points 2 past the last byte, which is not guaranteed to be a valid
addres
On Wed, 19.02.14 21:54, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
> >> Thanks for that. I did remember reading some posts about compilers so
> >> figured they were all down to that but nice that an actual bug was found
> >> too.
> >>
> >> Here's the results with 8f61afd.
> >
> > Are you sure yo
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 01:21:01AM +0200, Uoti Urpala wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 17:53 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > Zbigniew suggest we should drop -Wdeclaration-after-statement. I am not
> > convinced that that would be a good idea since generally declarations
> > after statements are
On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 17:53 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Zbigniew suggest we should drop -Wdeclaration-after-statement. I am not
> convinced that that would be a good idea since generally declarations
> after statements are an abomination, and we should avoid them, and it is
> nice if gcc war
On Tue, 18.02.14 19:11, Jason A. Donenfeld (ja...@zx2c4.com) wrote:
Applied! I also changed the other constructor calls accordingly.
Thanks!
> This matches the API of previous headers, such as sd-journal.h.
> ---
> TODO | 2 --
> src/libsystemd/sd-bus/bus-util.c | 8
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:56 AM, wrote:
>> On 02/12/2014 09:21 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:12 PM, wrote:
>>> > From: Charles Rose
>>> >
>>> > Dell servers contain a virtual usb nic for systems management.
>>>
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:26 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Graham Cantin
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Marcos Felipe Rasia de Mello
> >> wrote:
> >> > systemd-vconsole-setup req
Hi
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Graham Cantin wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Marcos Felipe Rasia de Mello
>> wrote:
>> > systemd-vconsole-setup requires loadkeys/setfont at runtime.
>> >
>> > BTW, since kbd 2.0.0 there i
If the session already exists then the only way to log it is to set the
debug option of pam_systemd. There are no debug messages in the login
service that permits to log if the session already exists.
So just add it, and while we are it add the "uid" field to the debug
message that indicates that
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Marcos Felipe Rasia de Mello
> wrote:
> > systemd-vconsole-setup requires loadkeys/setfont at runtime.
> >
> > BTW, since kbd 2.0.0 there is a library for this. Cristian idea should
> > go to the TODO list ;)
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> Now, as far as I can see I didn't break your scalibility changes,
> but I was wondering if you could give this a test run with your huge
> number of units setup?
With 4000 units (2000 sockets and 2000 corresponding services with
CPUSha
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Marcos Felipe Rasia de Mello
wrote:
> systemd-vconsole-setup requires loadkeys/setfont at runtime.
>
> BTW, since kbd 2.0.0 there is a library for this. Cristian idea should
> go to the TODO list ;)
>
> http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2013-08/msg00357.ht
systemd-vconsole-setup requires loadkeys/setfont at runtime.
BTW, since kbd 2.0.0 there is a library for this. Cristian idea should
go to the TODO list ;)
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2013-08/msg00357.html
___
systemd-devel mailing list
sy
2014-02-19 20:41 GMT+01:00 Kay Sievers :
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Peeters Simon
> wrote:
>> This weekend I switched 2 of my devices to kdbus. both running a 32bit
>> system (my atom based netbook and a beaglebone black)
>>
>> while compiling I ran in to trouble on both devices because o
On Wed, 19.02.14 19:43, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
> 'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 19/02/14 16:53 did gyre and gimble:
> > Soo, pretty much all of these are false positives triggered by
> > -flto. Before adding -flto we only got these fals positives within
> > source fi
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Peeters Simon wrote:
> This weekend I switched 2 of my devices to kdbus. both running a 32bit
> system (my atom based netbook and a beaglebone black)
>
> while compiling I ran in to trouble on both devices because of missing
> division and modulo operations for uin
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 08:34:31PM +0100, Peeters Simon wrote:
> hej
>
> This weekend I switched 2 of my devices to kdbus. both running a 32bit
> system (my atom based netbook and a beaglebone black)
>
> while compiling I ran in to trouble on both devices because of missing
> division and modulo
hej
This weekend I switched 2 of my devices to kdbus. both running a 32bit
system (my atom based netbook and a beaglebone black)
while compiling I ran in to trouble on both devices because of missing
division and modulo operations for uint64, both related to bloom.size
in match.c.
So my question
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> did you see the changes I made to the cgroup mask propagation bits? I
> reworked some code there to make sure that the mask doesn't keep
> increasing, but actually can lose bits again if cgroup properties are
> unset. Now, as far as I c
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 04:17:15PM +0100, Łukasz Stelmach wrote:
> It was <2014-02-19 śro 16:05>, when Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:44:32PM +0100, Łukasz Stelmach wrote:
> >> How to have support for more than one security fw reasonably
> >> compiled in? (I think
On Wed, 19.02.14 10:53, David Timothy Strauss (da...@davidstrauss.net) wrote:
> The only thing in master I'm still having to patch in production is
> the is-enabled code path so it doesn't look up all the symlinks. I
> don't see that as a release blocker, though.
David,
did you see the changes
The only thing in master I'm still having to patch in production is
the is-enabled code path so it doesn't look up all the symlinks. I
don't see that as a release blocker, though.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://l
2014-02-19 19:05 GMT+01:00 Lukasz Skalski :
>>> + shell-completion/bash/busctl \
>>
>> Shouldn't we install those files conditionally, based on --enable-kdbus ?
>
> No, busctl can be used also with standard dbus.
Ah, k. Wasn't aware of that. Thanks for the clarification.
--
Why is it that
On 02/19/2014 06:58 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
2014-02-19 17:45 GMT+01:00 Thomas H.P. Andersen :
From: Thomas Hindoe Paaboel Andersen
---
Makefile.am | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index b36b42d..8d58c52 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
2014-02-19 17:45 GMT+01:00 Thomas H.P. Andersen :
> From: Thomas Hindoe Paaboel Andersen
>
> ---
> Makefile.am | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
> index b36b42d..8d58c52 100644
> --- a/Makefile.am
> +++ b/Makefile.am
> @@ -348,6 +348,7 @@ systemgen
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> Please try to rebuild things again. You should still see some noise, but
> much less. Can you post your results again?
This should show it for you too:
$ make -j8 distcheck
Kay
___
systemd
On Wed, 19.02.14 17:49, Thomas H.P. Andersen (pho...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> I updated the bash completion and I think it is good enough to ship
> now. I could not get the status verb to work though. I just get
> "Failed to get credentials: No such process" for any endpoint name I
> point it to.
C
On Wed, 19.02.14 17:45, Thomas H.P. Andersen (pho...@gmail.com) wrote:
> From: Thomas Hindoe Paaboel Andersen
Applied! Thanks!
>
> ---
> Makefile.am | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
> index b36b42d..8d58c52 100644
> --- a/Makefile.am
> +++ b/
On Tue, 18.02.14 23:40, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> It seems that unit_get_siblings_mask returns the controllers
> filtered by what is available, but get_members_mask and
> get_cgroup_mask do not. This just fixes the test following the
> symptoms, since I don't know wh
On Wed, 19.02.14 11:47, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
> 'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 18/02/14 02:26 did gyre and gimble:
> > Heya!
> >
> > It's release time again! It has been more than 4 months now since the
> > last release. That's kinda emberassing, since we actually
I updated the bash completion and I think it is good enough to ship
now. I could not get the status verb to work though. I just get
"Failed to get credentials: No such process" for any endpoint name I
point it to.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Thomas H.P. Andersen wrote:
> From: Thomas Hindoe
From: Thomas Hindoe Paaboel Andersen
---
Makefile.am | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index b36b42d..8d58c52 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
@@ -348,6 +348,7 @@ systemgenerator_PROGRAMS = \
systemd-system-update-generator
dist_ba
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 04:10:49PM +, Schaufler, Casey wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Lennart Poettering [mailto:lenn...@poettering.net]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 7:08 AM
> > To: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > Cc: Łukasz Stelmach; Casey Schaufler; Schaufler, Casey
> -Original Message-
> From: Lennart Poettering [mailto:lenn...@poettering.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 7:08 AM
> To: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> Cc: Łukasz Stelmach; Casey Schaufler; Schaufler, Casey; systemd-
> de...@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [PAT
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Łukasz Stelmach wrote:
> It was <2014-02-19 śro 15:52>, when Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Łukasz Stelmach
>> wrote:
>>> It was <2014-02-18 wto 03:26>, when Lennart Poettering wrote:
Heya!
It's release time again! It has
On Wed, 19.02.14 11:39, Maciej Wereski (m.were...@partner.samsung.com) wrote:
Thanks! Applied both!
> ---
> src/systemctl/systemctl.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/systemctl/systemctl.c b/src/systemctl/systemctl.c
> index ef0cbc5..e529095 100644
> --- a/src/systemc
It was <2014-02-19 śro 16:06>, when Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 19.02.14 15:44, Łukasz Stelmach (l.stelm...@samsung.com) wrote:
>
>> > Also, please move the #ifdef HAVE_SMACK checks inside of this function
>> > and make it a NOP on non-SMACK builds. That way we only have one #ifdef
>> > che
It was <2014-02-19 śro 16:05>, when Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:44:32PM +0100, Łukasz Stelmach wrote:
>> How to have support for more than one security fw reasonably
>> compiled in? (I think this is the moment to create the pattern).
> Why not? It would be rather
On Wed, 19.02.14 16:05, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:44:32PM +0100, Łukasz Stelmach wrote:
> > How to have support for more than one security fw reasonably
> > compiled in? (I think this is the moment to create the pattern).
> Why not? It w
On Wed, 19.02.14 15:44, Łukasz Stelmach (l.stelm...@samsung.com) wrote:
> > Also, please move the #ifdef HAVE_SMACK checks inside of this function
> > and make it a NOP on non-SMACK builds. That way we only have one #ifdef
> > check for this and not one for each invocation of the function. The
> >
It was <2014-02-19 śro 15:52>, when Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Łukasz Stelmach
> wrote:
>> It was <2014-02-18 wto 03:26>, when Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>> Heya!
>>>
>>> It's release time again! It has been more than 4 months now since the
>>> last release. That's ki
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:44:32PM +0100, Łukasz Stelmach wrote:
> How to have support for more than one security fw reasonably
> compiled in? (I think this is the moment to create the pattern).
Why not? It would be rather constraining for a distribution which wants
to support more than one. system
On Wed, 19.02.14 15:14, Łukasz Stelmach (l.stelm...@samsung.com) wrote:
> It was <2014-02-19 śro 14:31>, when Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Wed, 19.02.14 14:07, Łukasz Stelmach (l.stelm...@samsung.com) wrote:
> >
> >> With loaded_policy set to true mount_setup() relabels /dev properly.
> >>
>
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Łukasz Stelmach
wrote:
> It was <2014-02-18 wto 03:26>, when Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> Heya!
>>
>> It's release time again! It has been more than 4 months now since the
>> last release. That's kinda emberassing, since we actually intended to go
>> for a 2-3 wee
It was <2014-02-19 śro 14:30>, when Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 19.02.14 14:07, Łukasz Stelmach (l.stelm...@samsung.com) wrote:
>
>> From: Casey Schaufler
>>
>> Systemd creates directories in /dev. These directories will
>> get the label of systemd, which is the label of the System
>> dom
It was <2014-02-19 śro 14:31>, when Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 19.02.14 14:07, Łukasz Stelmach (l.stelm...@samsung.com) wrote:
>
>> With loaded_policy set to true mount_setup() relabels /dev properly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Łukasz Stelmach
>
> Patch looks good, but we don't do S-o-b in sys
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:35:09AM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 01:34:24PM -0800, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> >> diff --git a/src
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:35:09AM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 01:34:24PM -0800, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> >> diff --git a/src/network/networkd-network.c
> >> b/src/network/networkd-network.c
> >> ind
On Wed, 19.02.14 14:07, Łukasz Stelmach (l.stelm...@samsung.com) wrote:
> With loaded_policy set to true mount_setup() relabels /dev properly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Łukasz Stelmach
Patch looks good, but we don't do S-o-b in systemd.
> ---
> src/core/main.c|2 +-
> src/core/smack-setu
On Wed, 19.02.14 14:07, Łukasz Stelmach (l.stelm...@samsung.com) wrote:
> From: Casey Schaufler
>
> Systemd creates directories in /dev. These directories will
> get the label of systemd, which is the label of the System
> domain, which is not accessable to everyone. Relabel the
> directories, f
With loaded_policy set to true mount_setup() relabels /dev properly.
Signed-off-by: Łukasz Stelmach
---
src/core/main.c|2 +-
src/core/smack-setup.c |6 +-
src/core/smack-setup.h |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/core/main.c b/src/c
From: Casey Schaufler
Systemd creates directories in /dev. These directories will
get the label of systemd, which is the label of the System
domain, which is not accessable to everyone. Relabel the
directories, files and symlinks created so that they can be
generally used.
Signed-off-by: Casey S
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> 'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 18/02/14 02:26 did gyre and gimble:
>> Heya!
>>
>> It's release time again! It has been more than 4 months now since the
>> last release. That's kinda emberassing, since we actually intended to go
>>
It was <2014-02-18 wto 03:26>, when Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Heya!
>
> It's release time again! It has been more than 4 months now since the
> last release. That's kinda emberassing, since we actually intended to go
> for a 2-3 week cycle... The big dbus transition took some time however.
>
> Ay
---
src/systemctl/systemctl.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/systemctl/systemctl.c b/src/systemctl/systemctl.c
index ef0cbc5..e529095 100644
--- a/src/systemctl/systemctl.c
+++ b/src/systemctl/systemctl.c
@@ -5879,7 +5879,6 @@ static int runlevel_parse_argv(int argc, char *
---
src/login/logind.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/login/logind.c b/src/login/logind.c
index 2add241..7aea3cd 100644
--- a/src/login/logind.c
+++ b/src/login/logind.c
@@ -73,8 +73,7 @@ Manager *manager_new(void) {
m->busnames = set_new(string_
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 01:34:24PM -0800, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> diff --git a/src/network/networkd-network.c b/src/network/networkd-network.c
>> index 48131c1..a470c22 100644
>> --- a/src/network/networkd-network.c
>> +++ b/src
It was <2014-02-18 wto 17:51>, when Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 18.02.14 16:37, Schaufler, Casey (casey.schauf...@intel.com) wrote:
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Schaufler, Casey
>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 8:27 AM
>>> To: Lennart Poettering; Łukasz Stelmach
>>> Cc: syst
68 matches
Mail list logo
