Hi Shawn,
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 04:59:29PM -0700, Shawn Landden wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:10:34AM -0700, Shawn Landden wrote:
[...]
> >> The point is that assert() and assert_se() should only be used for
> >> programming error
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:10:34AM -0700, Shawn Landden wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
>> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 07:32:35PM -0700, Shawn Landden wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Djalal Harou
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:10:34AM -0700, Shawn Landden wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 07:32:35PM -0700, Shawn Landden wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 09:51:26AM -0700, S
---
src/systemctl/systemctl.c | 51 +++
1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/systemctl/systemctl.c b/src/systemctl/systemctl.c
index 3158a38..bf279f9 100644
--- a/src/systemctl/systemctl.c
+++ b/src/systemctl/systemctl.c
@@ -4133,6 +4133,57
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 5:33 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> That has the restriction that any DNS server you want to pass on to
> the client must also be a valid DNS server on the server. Which I
> think is fine.
>
> Makes sense?
Hi Tom,
Definitely. If this is a useful feature, I'm happy to try to g
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 07:32:35PM -0700, Shawn Landden wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
>> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 09:51:26AM -0700, Shawn Landden wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Tom Gunderse
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Shawn Landden wrote:
> replaces log with abort() to remove strings.
>
> saves 3kB from text section of systemd.
and 7kB from rodata. The saving in text is probably because abort() is
no_return.
> ---
> src/shared/macro.h | 16 ++--
> 1 file changed, 10
On Tue, 31.03.15 11:01, Shawn Landden (shawnland...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 30.03.15 19:30, Shawn Landden (shawnland...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> >> > What do you feel is missing from systemctl show?
> >>
> >> It is only suppose
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 07:32:35PM -0700, Shawn Landden wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
>> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 09:51:26AM -0700, Shawn Landden wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Tom Gunderse
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Mon, 30.03.15 19:30, Shawn Landden (shawnland...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> > What do you feel is missing from systemctl show?
>>
>> It is only suppose to show fields that have been changed by humans
>> (even the developer) not systemd d
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov
wrote:
> On 31 March 2015 at 15:08, Shawn Landden wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:31 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 03/31/2015 02:30 AM, Shawn Landden wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 4:02 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðm
On Mon, 30.03.15 19:30, Shawn Landden (shawnland...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > What do you feel is missing from systemctl show?
>
> It is only suppose to show fields that have been changed by humans
> (even the developer) not systemd defaults.
Hmm?
It supresses "empty" fields by default, unless you
On Mon, 30.03.15 15:32, Shawn Landden (shawnland...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 1:35 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> wrote:
> > Heyja
> >
> > Should this not be dropped and *DE write,integrate/implement an graphical
> > frontend to systemd for themselves?
> >
> > It's not like this
On Mon, 30.03.15 20:35, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Heyja
>
> Should this not be dropped and *DE write,integrate/implement an graphical
> frontend to systemd for themselves?
>
> It's not like this is receiving the love it needs, hence I'm pretty sure
> nobody is using thi
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 07:14:26PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 31.03.15 11:35, Dave Reisner (d...@falconindy.com) wrote:
>
> > > +/* Some systems abusively restrict mknod
> > > but
> > > + * allow bind mounts. */
> > >
On Mon, 30.03.15 14:42, Lukas Nykryn (lnyk...@redhat.com) wrote:
> If you havei for example ext4 on iscsi devices it is possible to setup
> qoutas there. Unfortunatelly because such fstab entry contains _netdev,
> systemd will not add dependency to quotaon.service.
I think this really needs a com
On Tue, 31.03.15 16:10, Lukas Nykryn (lnyk...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Older version of systemd does not have d-bus method "ListUnitsFiltered",
> so systemctl -r will fail just with:
I think I'd really prefer if we'd simply fall back to ListUnits() in
this case, and do the filtering client side only.
On Tue, 31.03.15 17:10, Michal Sekletar (msekl...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Users might have hard time figuring out that they need to call systemctl
> reset-failed, before they are allowed to start the service again, after
> service
> ended up in failed state because start job rate limiting. Let's be
On Tue, 31.03.15 11:35, Dave Reisner (d...@falconindy.com) wrote:
> > +/* Some systems abusively restrict mknod
> > but
> > + * allow bind mounts. */
> > +r = touch(to);
> > +
On Tuesday 31 March 2015 13:53:38 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 09:46:40AM +0100, Simon Farnsworth wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > We've got the Easter long weekend coming up here in the UK, and I intend to
> > spend it away from the computer. Is there anything I need to f
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Dave Reisner wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 05:14:48PM +0200, Alban Crequy wrote:
>> From: Alban Crequy
>>
>> Some systems abusively restrict mknod, even when the device node already
>> exists in /dev. This is unfortunate because it prevents systemd-nspawn
>> fr
On 03/31/2015 02:30 PM, Michael Laß wrote:
Am Montag, den 30.03.2015, 20:35 + schrieb "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson":
It's not like this is receiving the love it needs, hence I'm pretty sure
nobody is using this.
Is there a replacement for systemd-gnome-ask-password-agent in any
desktop suite? I
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 07:32:35PM -0700, Shawn Landden wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 09:51:26AM -0700, Shawn Landden wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> > [...]
> >> >> * Current expression may modify/i
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 05:14:48PM +0200, Alban Crequy wrote:
> From: Alban Crequy
>
> Some systems abusively restrict mknod, even when the device node already
> exists in /dev. This is unfortunate because it prevents systemd-nspawn
> from creating the basic devices in /dev in the container.
>
>
On Tue, 31.03.15 17:14, Alban Crequy (alban.cre...@gmail.com) wrote:
> From: Alban Crequy
>
> Some systems abusively restrict mknod, even when the device node already
> exists in /dev. This is unfortunate because it prevents systemd-nspawn
> from creating the basic devices in /dev in the contain
On 03/31/2015 02:58 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
When I made the final ConsoleKit release, I added a NEWS entry, saying
that this software was discontinued and pointing to the replacements.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/ConsoleKit/commit/?id=af75e100dc4d4fac2e1633aa134e40e390d38918
We could do some
From: Alban Crequy
Some systems abusively restrict mknod, even when the device node already
exists in /dev. This is unfortunate because it prevents systemd-nspawn
from creating the basic devices in /dev in the container.
This patch implements a workaround: when mknod fails, fallback on bind
moun
Users might have hard time figuring out that they need to call systemctl
reset-failed, before they are allowed to start the service again, after service
ended up in failed state because start job rate limiting. Let's be nice and
print better error message.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?
When I made the final ConsoleKit release, I added a NEWS entry, saying
that this software was discontinued and pointing to the replacements.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/ConsoleKit/commit/?id=af75e100dc4d4fac2e1633aa134e40e390d38918
We could do something similar for systemd-ui. That said, I think
On Tue, 31.03.15 16:51, Alban Crequy (alban.cre...@gmail.com) wrote:
> -if (mknod(to, st.st_mode, st.st_rdev) < 0)
> -return log_error_errno(errno, "mknod(%s)
> failed: %m", to);
> +if (mknod(to, st.st_mode, st.st_rde
From: Alban Crequy
Some systems abusively restrict mknod, even when the device node already
exists in /dev. This is unfortunate because it prevents systemd-nspawn
from creating the basic devices in /dev in the container.
This patch implements a workaround: when mknod fails, fallback on bind
moun
On 03/31/2015 02:27 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>And from the looks of it the Red Hat desktop team maintainers in Gnome seem
>to be expecting the Gnome users to be using Red Hat's own product cockpit to
>take care of that.
sorry, but that's not a real replacement for systemadm. Don't want to
run
Am Montag, den 30.03.2015, 20:35 + schrieb "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson":
> It's not like this is receiving the love it needs, hence I'm pretty sure
> nobody is using this.
Is there a replacement for systemd-gnome-ask-password-agent in any
desktop suite? I know at least one person using that peace
2015-03-31 16:20 GMT+02:00 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" :
>
>
> On 03/31/2015 02:09 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>
>> 2015-03-31 15:47 GMT+02:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>> :
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 07:31:31AM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
What I'm proposing is that we dropped
On 31 March 2015 at 15:08, Shawn Landden wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:31 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 03/31/2015 02:30 AM, Shawn Landden wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 4:02 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
>>> wrote:
>
>
>On 03/30/2015 10:32 PM,
On 03/31/2015 02:09 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
2015-03-31 15:47 GMT+02:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek :
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 07:31:31AM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
What I'm proposing is that we dropped that proof of concept since
it's not being maintained, there exist better altern
On 03/31/2015 01:47 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 07:31:31AM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>What I'm proposing is that we dropped that proof of concept since
>it's not being maintained, there exist better alternatives thus it's
>intended purpose has bee
Older version of systemd does not have d-bus method "ListUnitsFiltered",
so systemctl -r will fail just with:
Failed to list units: Method "ListUnitsFiltered" with signature "as" on
interface "org.freedesktop.systemd1.Manager" doesn't exist
So lets skip such machines.
---
src/systemctl/systemctl
2015-03-31 15:47 GMT+02:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek :
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 07:31:31AM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>> What I'm proposing is that we dropped that proof of concept since
>> it's not being maintained, there exist better alternatives thus it's
>> intended purpose has be
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:31 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
>
>
> On 03/31/2015 02:30 AM, Shawn Landden wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 4:02 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >On 03/30/2015 10:32 PM, Shawn Landden wrote:
>>
>>On Mon, Mar 30, 2015
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 09:46:40AM +0100, Simon Farnsworth wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We've got the Easter long weekend coming up here in the UK, and I intend to
> spend it away from the computer. Is there anything I need to fix with this
> patch to make it acceptable to you?
No, the patch is fine afaik.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 07:31:31AM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> What I'm proposing is that we dropped that proof of concept since
> it's not being maintained, there exist better alternatives thus it's
> intended purpose has been fulfilled already.
Agreed that it doesn't make sense to hav
On Tue, 31.03.15 11:08, Andrew Jones (drjo...@redhat.com) wrote:
Thanks! Applied all three!
> This series adds support for detecting if an arm or aarch64
> deployment is a Xen or QEMU/KVM guest. I've tested the QEMU/KVM
> detection on an AArch64 guest. The Xen detection has *not* been
> tested, t
On Tue, 31.03.15 11:50, Iago López Galeiras (i...@endocode.com) wrote:
> Try to keep syscalls as minimal as possible.
Thanks! Applied!
> ---
> src/core/namespace.c | 2 +-
> src/nspawn/nspawn.c | 16
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/cor
Try to keep syscalls as minimal as possible.
---
src/core/namespace.c | 2 +-
src/nspawn/nspawn.c | 16
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/core/namespace.c b/src/core/namespace.c
index f8a2bbc..718da23 100644
--- a/src/core/namespace.c
+++ b/src/c
QEMU/KVM guests do not have hypervisor nodes, but they do have
fw-cfg nodes (since qemu v2.3.0-rc0). fw-cfg nodes are documented,
see kernel doc Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fw-cfg.txt,
and therefore we should be able to rely on it in this detection.
Unfortunately, we currently don't have
This series adds support for detecting if an arm or aarch64
deployment is a Xen or QEMU/KVM guest. I've tested the QEMU/KVM
detection on an AArch64 guest. The Xen detection has *not* been
tested, thus the RFT. Also note that testing was not done with
this exact series, but rather a backport to an o
Kernel doc Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-ofw says that
the /proc/device-tree symlink should be used, as opposed to
directly accessing /sys/firmware/devicetree/base. The former is
ABI, but not the later.
---
src/shared/virt.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --
---
src/shared/virt.c | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/shared/virt.c b/src/shared/virt.c
index aa3501f42916c..712523210d720 100644
--- a/src/shared/virt.c
+++ b/src/shared/virt.c
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static int detect_vm_cpuid(const char **_id) {
}
sta
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 09:18:08AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 30.03.15 21:15, Andrew Jones (drjo...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > QEMU/KVM guests do not have hypervisor nodes, but they do have
> > fw-cfg nodes (since qemu v2.3.0-rc0). fw-cfg nodes are documented,
> > see kernel doc Docu
Hello,
We've got the Easter long weekend coming up here in the UK, and I intend to
spend it away from the computer. Is there anything I need to fix with this
patch to make it acceptable to you?
On Wednesday 25 March 2015 17:00:09 Simon Farnsworth wrote:
> Just a couple of trivial oversights.
> --
On 03/31/2015 02:30 AM, Shawn Landden wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 4:02 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
>
>
>On 03/30/2015 10:32 PM, Shawn Landden wrote:
>>
>>On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 1:35 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>Heyja
>>>
>>>Should this not be dropped and *DE wri
On Mon, 30.03.15 21:15, Andrew Jones (drjo...@redhat.com) wrote:
> QEMU/KVM guests do not have hypervisor nodes, but they do have
> fw-cfg nodes (since qemu v2.3.0-rc0). fw-cfg nodes are documented,
> see kernel doc Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fw-cfg.txt,
> and therefore we should be abl
53 matches
Mail list logo
