before
sending a single IP package.
Thanks.
On Nov 24, 2013, at 4:33 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
umut.tezdu...@axis.com wrote:
Are there any plans to support 802.1x by systemd-networkd?
To the best of my knowledge no one
Hi,
On Nov 24, 2013, at 4:39 PM, Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
umut.tezdu...@axis.com wrote:
How do we support thread level resource management with the new cgroup
abstraction?
How do we do it in the process level then. Lets say
Hi,
I can’t find the last word on Oleksii’s coredump patch
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2013-May/010991.html. Was
there a decision about not taking it in?
Thanks
___
systemd-devel mailing list
On Nov 25, 2013, at 6:59 PM, Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
umut.tezdu...@axis.com wrote:
On Nov 24, 2013, at 4:39 PM, Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
umut.tezdu...@axis.com
Hi,
Find my comments below please.
On Nov 29, 2013, at 9:51 AM, David Timothy Strauss da...@davidstrauss.net
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
umut.tezdu...@axis.com wrote:
Can someone explain the process level management?
Right now, it's possible to do
Hi,
Now that dbus sockets are by default expected to be in /run by systemd;
/var/run by other dbus libraries, we have to use env variables to tell one of
them the correct socket path.
Both systemd and glib (gio) are hardcoding the default dbus socket path and
having an override with
It is broken when bindir is /usr/bin and /lib is not symbolic link to /usr/lib.
bus-proxyd-install-hook:
$(AM_V_LN)$(LN_S) -f ../../lib/systemd/systemd-bus-proxyd
$(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/systemd-stdio-bridge
Maybe best to use full path.
___
Hi,
.device units stopped showing up for me in git systemd since somewhere around
mid-december. I have noticed that udevd and even udevadm monitor receives the
kernel events but systemd itself never receives them.
Further debugging, I have found out device_dispatch_io() (src/core/device.c) is
13 januari 2014 14:38
To: Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
Cc: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] .device units are not showing up on git systemd
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:37:58AM +0100, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
Hi,
.device units stopped showing up for me in git
From: Umut Tezduyar Lindskog umu...@axis.com
---
README |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/README b/README
index a1058c5..6fcab4f 100644
--- a/README
+++ b/README
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ REQUIREMENTS:
Some udev rules and virtualization detection relies
This covers the case where NamePolicy has mac in it
and MACAddress is given.
Ex:
NamePolicy=mac
MACAddress=00:00:00:00:00:00
Interface name becomes [en|wl]x
Also cleanup rtnl_set_link_properties
---
src/libsystemd/rtnl-util.c | 16 ++---
Hi Tom,
-Original Message-
From: Tom Gundersen [mailto:t...@jklm.no]
Sent: den 15 januari 2014 14:23
To: Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
Cc: systemd Mailing List; Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] udev: ifname matches given mac
Hi Umut,
I'm not really
---
Makefile.am |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index 72da667..7886a81 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
@@ -1744,6 +1744,7 @@ systemd_gpt_auto_generator_CFLAGS = \
endif
#
Hi,
ca76186598c56 (Jan 7) has removed the ability to stop all dbus services at once
by executing systemctl stop dbus.socket. If that is intentional I can live
with it but then we also need to change the man systemd.service and
systemd.special as they still mention the dependency to
---
src/libsystemd/sd-dhcp-client.c | 147 ++-
1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 111 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/libsystemd/sd-dhcp-client.c b/src/libsystemd/sd-dhcp-client.c
index a057852..3b7b9f4 100644
--- a/src/libsystemd/sd-dhcp-client.c
+++
Interface could go down before acquiring a dhcp lease
---
src/network/networkd-link.c | 10 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/network/networkd-link.c b/src/network/networkd-link.c
index d83c4ce..9aca1b6 100644
--- a/src/network/networkd-link.c
+++
Hi Ivan,
Great job!
I was wondering if a ./configure switch makes sense to disable it.
Embedded devices won't be using it.
Thanks
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Ivan Shapovalov intelfx...@gmail.com wrote:
This patchset allows systemd to parse resume= kernel command line parameter
and
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 3:24 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 08:49:29PM -0400, Gary Mort wrote:
Socket based activation for systemd is a really cool feature for my
dev system.
Prior to using socket based activation, on my dev system I would
Hi, this is already in the backlog:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2014-August/022368.html
Thanks anyways.
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Marius Tessmann mus@gmail.com wrote:
After= belongs into [Unit], not [Install]. Found with systemd-analyze
verify.
---
---
src/libsystemd-network/sd-ipv4ll.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/libsystemd-network/sd-ipv4ll.c
b/src/libsystemd-network/sd-ipv4ll.c
index 3d15fc8..8b24331 100644
--- a/src/libsystemd-network/sd-ipv4ll.c
+++ b/src/libsystemd-network/sd-ipv4ll.c
@@
I think
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2014-August/022787.html
should do it! Thanks.
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Umut Tezduyar u...@tezduyar.com wrote:
Thanks. I will take a look at it.
On Aug 30, 2014, at 3:08 PM, Jan Janssen medhe...@web.de wrote:
Hi,
on my
Hi,
I would like to start a configurable set of services first and the
services are wanted by multi-user.target. I am using a service to jump
to multi-user.target and I was wondering if we can support this use
case natively by systemd.
multi-user.target.wants
A.service
B.service
C.service
---
Makefile.am | 52
configure.ac |6 ++
2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index 1991fd0..58e5ce6 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
@@ -378,15 +378,13 @@
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 1:38 PM, David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
anybody an idea why?
The syslog daemon couldn't keep up with reading the log-messages. You
might wanna increase the syslog
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 15.09.2014 um 14:23 schrieb Umut Tezduyar Lindskog:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 1:38 PM, David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote
Axis Communications is running fairly compact version of systemd with some
properties disabled with --disable--xyz. Files are a bit over 10 mb on MIPS ISA
(stripped of binaries and conf files).
Top 10 large files are (in kb)
276 ./Root/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
280 ./Root/usr/bin/udevadm
As Tom stated this is changing the behaviour. Maybe not when you only
have 1 interface but if we are talking about multiple interfaces, then
they will share common entropy.
Umut
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
No, this actually breaks the behaviour, so we
Hi,
I am a bit confused about the service as it returns with error on systemd 216:
● systemd-journal-upload.service - Journal Remote Upload Service
Loaded: loaded (/etc/systemd/system/systemd-journal-upload.service; enabled)
Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Sun 2006-10-01 06:34:59
:56 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:36:20AM +0200, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
Hi,
I am a bit confused about the service as it returns with error on systemd
216:
● systemd-journal-upload.service - Journal Remote Upload Service
Loaded
Also DefaultEnvironment on system.conf
(http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd-system.conf.html)
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 11:08:42PM -0400, Amit Saha wrote:
Hello,
Is systemd.setenv on the
Hi,
I have stumbled on a race condition on systemd-run --scope command.
Due to race condition, unit might show up as active/running even
though there is no process in the cgroup.
My best guess is we are missing the cgroup notification but when?
- Could it be that before systemd processes
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Wed, 22.10.14 13:10, Damien Robert (damien.olivier.robert+gm...@gmail.com)
wrote:
On one boot I got a watchdog timeout on systemd-journald:
Oct 21 20:08:21 feanor systemd-journal[213]: Permanent journal is
, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
Hi,
I have stumbled on a race condition on systemd-run --scope command.
Due to race condition, unit might show up as active/running even
though there is no process in the cgroup.
Umut!
At the hackfest in Düsseldorf you showed me an easy way
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Wed, 22.10.14 18:35, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
That's difficult to say just from these logs. Can you reliably
reproduce this? If so, can you attach strace to journald before
if sigabrt doesn't do the job, follow regular shutdown
routine, sigterm sigkill.
Umut:
- I have done basic testing with suppressing sigabrt,
suppressing both sigabrt sigterm on client application.
- Documentation needs to be updated. I wasn't sure if we
should mention it in KillMode,
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Tue, 02.09.14 10:06, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
Hi,
I would like to start a configurable set of services first and the
services are wanted by multi-user.target. I am using a service
if sigabrt doesn't do the job, follow regular shutdown
routine, sigterm sigkill.
Umut:
- I have done basic testing with suppressing sigabrt,
suppressing both sigabrt sigterm on client application.
- Documentation needs to be updated. I wasn't sure if we
should mention it in KillMode,
if sigabrt doesn't do the job, follow regular shutdown
routine, sigterm sigkill.
---
TODO| 2 --
man/systemd.service.xml | 5 +++--
src/core/busname.c | 2 +-
src/core/mount.c| 3 ++-
src/core/scope.c| 2 +-
src/core/service.c | 37
---
NEWS | 4
man/journalctl.xml | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index 82a1948..d8770a0 100644
--- a/NEWS
+++ b/NEWS
@@ -7,6 +7,10 @@ CHANGES WITH 217:
show log timestamps in the UTC timezone. journalctl now also
Hi Lennart,
Were you able to figure out the problem? You were suspecting that we
might not be getting cgroup empty notifications from kernel.
Umut
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
u...@tezduyar.com wrote:
Hi,
Since you said you have covered my theories when you
Hi,
What is the reasoning for not joining cpu subsystem with systemd subsystem?
There are couple ways you can mirror [1] cpu and systemd subsystems
and doing so can result completely different cpu bandwidth for
processes.
I am wondering why we don't mirror them by default.
Not mirroring them
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Wed, 05.11.14 13:41, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
Hi,
What is the reasoning for not joining cpu subsystem with systemd subsystem?
There are couple ways you can mirror [1] cpu and systemd
Hi XinX
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Cao, XinX xinx@intel.com wrote:
Hi, everybody,
As we all know that currently systemd puts all the services into
a run_queue, and lets them run together as possible as it can. However, this
mechanism also brings in a problem, which
Hi,
Quote from man service:
BusName= Takes a D-Bus bus name that this service is reachable as.
This option is mandatory for services where Type= is set to dbus, but
its use is otherwise recommended if the process takes a name on the
D-Bus bus.
Why it is recommended?
If you have Type=simple and
Hi XinX,
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Cao, XinX xinx@intel.com wrote:
Hi, Umut,
Days ago you told me “StartupCPUShares”, and I had a test of
this option in my system. But it seems systemd on my system doesn’t know
this item. And I got this message “Unknow lvalue
On Sunday, November 23, 2014, Susant Sahani sus...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/23/2014 09:33 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
Hi,
Hi Umut,
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 5:45 AM, Susant Sahani sus...@redhat.com wrote:
This patch integrates LLDP with networkd.
Example conf:
file : lldp.network
Hi
On Monday, November 24, 2014, D.S. Ljungmark spi...@aanstoot.se wrote:
On 10/11/14 23:09, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 30.10.14 18:47, D.S. Ljungmark (spi...@aanstoot.se
javascript:;) wrote:
Hi
we have a service set to:
ConditionFileNotEmpty=
and
Restart=Always
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Richard Weinberger rich...@nod.at wrote:
Hi!
I run a Linux container setup with openSUSE 13.1/2 as guest distro.
After some time containers slow down.
An investigation showed that the containers slow down because a lot of stale
user sessions slow down
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 2:38 PM, D.S. Ljungmark spi...@aanstoot.se wrote:
On 24/11/14 20:30, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
Hi
On Monday, November 24, 2014, D.S. Ljungmark spi...@aanstoot.se
mailto:spi...@aanstoot.se wrote:
On 10/11/14 23:09, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2014-November/025492.html
---
man/systemd.service.xml | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/man/systemd.service.xml b/man/systemd.service.xml
index e563b19..f99e4d5 100644
--- a/man/systemd.service.xml
+++
Hi,
We are experiencing an unbreakable loop in manager_dispatch_gc_queue.
Problem happens when systemd runs in sysV compatibility mode (Porky
enables this).
Seems like manager_dispatch_gc_queue's while loop gets stuck and seems
like unit_gc_sweep cannot make a decision about the unit. As a
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Mon, 17.11.14 23:46, WaLyong Cho (walyong@samsung.com) wrote:
Hello,
I'd made two different services. One has *CPUSchedulingPolicy=rr* and
the others has *CPUShares=*.
Could anyone help me?
If
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Sun, 30.11.14 14:38, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
Hi,
We are experiencing an unbreakable loop in manager_dispatch_gc_queue.
Problem happens when systemd runs in sysV compatibility mode
Trying to build 218 but I am getting undefined reference error. The
source code of bus-error.c mentions that gcc magically maps these
variables but not for me.
What is doing the mapping? __attribute__ ((__section__(BUS_ERROR_MAP))) ?
Could it be that mentioned gcc magic is not supported on cross
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Thu, 11.12.14 23:01, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
Trying to build 218 but I am getting undefined reference error. The
source code of bus-error.c mentions that gcc magically maps
-axis-linux-gnu/lib:/build/target/mipsisa32r2el-axis-linux-gnu/usr/lib
-o libnss_resolve.la -rpath /usr/lib src/nss-resolve/nss-resolve.lo
libsystemd-shared.la libsystemd-internal.la -lrt -ldl
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
u...@tezduyar.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Fri, 12.12.14 10:10, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11133
But that's 4y old... Or is your toolchain that old?
Shouldn't
For the reference, -flto option was preventing static linker from
making the assignments. Could be very well something specific to our
toolchain.
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
u...@tezduyar.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
u...@tezduyar.com wrote:
The other thought is, what is the preferred way of loading modules
when they are needed.
Rely on kernel autoloading. Not all modules support
---
src/shared/path-util.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/shared/path-util.c b/src/shared/path-util.c
index dcc8321..304281f 100644
--- a/src/shared/path-util.c
+++ b/src/shared/path-util.c
@@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ fallback:
if (r 0)
= name_to_handle_at(AT_FDCWD, parent, h.handle,
mount_id_parent, 0);
+r = name_to_handle_at(AT_FDCWD, parent, h.handle,
mount_id_parent, AT_SYMLINK_FOLLOW);
Umut
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 3:20 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 09:58:39PM +0100, Umut Tezduyar
For the record:
It is not enough to have CONFIG_FHANDLE to get the support for
name_to_handle_with(). The FS also needs to support it and UBIFS
doesn't have support for it at the moment.
Umut
___
systemd-devel mailing list
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/17/2014 02:20 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 09:58:39PM +0100, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
---
src/shared/path-util.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Wed, 17.12.14 10:45, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
For the record:
It is not enough to have CONFIG_FHANDLE to get the support for
name_to_handle_with(). The FS also needs to support
Fantastic Tom! You were nice enough to group all the hwdb files in a section.
Can I send a patch to wrap them with a ./configure option? The option
should even include to make udevadm-hwdb.c, libudev-hwdb.c and
udev-builtin-hwdb.c configurable.
Umut
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Tom
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
u...@tezduyar.com wrote:
Can I send a patch to wrap them with a ./configure option? The option
should even include to make udevadm-hwdb.c, libudev-hwdb.c and
udev-builtin
---
Makefile-man.am | 9 ++---
Makefile.am | 2 ++
configure.ac| 6 ++
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile-man.am b/Makefile-man.am
index 45b8238..c6506aa 100644
--- a/Makefile-man.am
+++ b/Makefile-man.am
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@ MANPAGES += \
Umut: I can't generate man list since I am cross compiling
Please run make update-man-list and include changes on
Makefile-man.am.
I have updated the Makefile-man.am manually on v1, even though
very first that file says DO NOT EDIT IT.
---
Makefile.am | 2 ++
configure.ac | 6 ++
2 files
, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
umut.tezdu...@axis.com wrote:
---
Makefile-man.am | 9 ++---
Makefile.am | 2 ++
configure.ac| 6 ++
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile-man.am b/Makefile-man.am
index 45b8238..c6506aa 100644
--- a/Makefile-man.am
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 10:45:34AM +, Hoyer, Marko (ADITG/SW2) wrote:
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: systemd-devel [mailto:systemd-devel-
boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
Hi Marko,
Thank you very much for your feedback!
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Hoyer, Marko (ADITG/SW2)
mho...@de.adit-jv.com wrote:
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: systemd-devel [mailto:systemd-devel-
boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
Sent
Ping?
On Wednesday, December 10, 2014, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog u...@tezduyar.com
wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net javascript:; wrote:
On Sun, 30.11.14 14:38, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com
javascript:;) wrote:
Hi,
We
Hi,
Our /etc is a sym link and due to that all the links created by
tmpfiles.d/etc.conf are wrong. Is there a reason why the links are
relative?
I would like to send a patch to either:
a) Convert the relative links to absolute ones.
b) Follow the sym link before creating the relative one.
Umut
Hi,
condition_test_needs_update() wants the timestamp of /usr to be newer
than what is being checked.
Is there a reason why we don't check for /usr != Condition.parameter?
It makes sense to check for /usr Condition.parameter in a package
managed linux but our embedded system is upgrading the
not while applying the parsed sysctl values. Otherwise
info Overwriting earlier assignment of %s in file %s is
visible many times even though the given --prefix doesn't
try to set the overridden value.
---
src/sysctl/sysctl.c | 34 ++
1 file changed, 18
not while applying the parsed sysctl values. Otherwise
info Overwriting earlier assignment of %s in file %s is
visible many times even though the given --prefix doesn't
try to set the overridden value.
This also optimizes the startup tiny bit since we have udev
rules running on network devices
not while applying the parsed sysctl values. Otherwise
info Overwriting earlier assignment of %s in file %s is
visible many times even though the given --prefix doesn't
try to set the overridden value.
---
src/sysctl/sysctl.c | 32
1 file changed, 16
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 03:50:01PM +0100, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
not while applying the parsed sysctl values. Otherwise
info Overwriting earlier assignment of %s in file %s is
visible many times even
Hi David,
Have you done any experiment in terms of the number of connections can
be made on 32 bit arch with bus proxy being multi-threaded instead of
multi-processed?
Umut
-- Forwarded message --
From: David Herrmann dvd...@kemper.freedesktop.org
Date: Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at
Hi Susant,
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Susant Sahani sus...@redhat.com wrote:
This patch adds support for RFC 5424 syslog format to journald. Journald
can now forward logs to a multicast UDP group.
RFC 5424 format:
PRIVERSION SP TIMESTAMP SP HOSTNAME SP APP-NAME SP PROCID SP MSGID SP
For the reference, LTO doesn't work with systemd 218 on mips:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2014-December/026326.html
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Cristian Rodríguez
crrodrig...@opensuse.org wrote:
LTO may be unreliable, does not work properly in several archs
It may
Otherwise every daemon reload prints out warnings like:
systemd[1]: Unit type .busname is not supported on this system.
systemd[1]: Unit type .swap is not supported on this system.
---
src/core/manager.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/core/manager.c
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 1:35 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Mon, 26.01.15 14:00, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
Hi,
condition_test_needs_update() wants the timestamp of /usr to be newer
than what is being checked.
Is there a reason why we
Hi,
I would like to pass the time it was spent in bootloader to systemd.
Is there a kernel command line to pass this information on non EFI
bootloader? Or is there an another way?
Umut
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
this problem too. Thanks!
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Jeff Waugh j...@bethesignal.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
u...@tezduyar.com wrote:
What does this fix Jeff, could you please explain?
Here's the relevant part of a pkg-config file produced during
Getting inspiration from what you are proposing, you can already forward
messages to a datagram socket (syslog). You could implement a program to
empty out the datagram socket and only write the messages you want. Syslog
format doesnt know anything about FIELD though. One down side of this
systemd-cgtop --dept=1 -b -n 10 -d 0.1 | cat
Assertion 'new_length = 3' failed at src/shared/util.c:3 \
595, function ellipsize_mem(). Aborting.
Aborted (core dumped)
---
src/cgtop/cgtop.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/cgtop/cgtop.c b/src/cgtop/cgtop.c
What does this fix Jeff, could you please explain?
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Jeff Waugh j...@bethesignal.org wrote:
Generate pkg-config files during configure as God (Havoc) intended. This fixes
all of systemd's pkg-config files when cross-compiling (and possibly other use
cases).
Hi Marko,
On Sunday, March 1, 2015, Hoyer, Marko (ADITG/SW2) mho...@de.adit-jv.com
wrote:
Hi,
I ran into a use case where the activation phase of a service takes
significantly longer than the desired watchdog period (Activating:
10-20secs, Watchdog: 1-5secs).
I found out that the watchdog
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Wed, 04.03.15 18:51, Alexander Larsson (al...@redhat.com) wrote:
If i run a transient scope on the user systemd instance like:
$ systemd-run --user --scope true
Then the scope seems to live past the end of
Hi,
How do I add a slice that is inside the system.slice?
Following slice gets nested to -.slice where I want to nest it inside
system.slice (just like instantaneous service slices).
hello.slice
[Unit]
Description=hello slice
I tried following which produced the correct output with systemctl
Hi,
What you have figured out is so far the only way if you want to have
dynamic targets.
If you do not use --no-block to start your second target, first
target will never finish.
Other caveat of your way is that systemd doesn't know about your final
target until it receives systemctl start
My two cents is feature can be implemented as long as we get support
from the application. For example sd-event has the builtin support to
quit when it is idle. Systemd can pass the exit-on-idle timeout to the
application via env variables so the event loop can configure itself
to quit.
I am not
It is not uncommon that file systems have the same volume label,
especially on flash drives. disk/by-label udev rule in
60-persistent-storage.rules generates a symb link to the device. 2
devices might have the same label link if they have same label.
After 628c89cc, this becomes very visible with
Hi Greg,
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 04:08:50PM +0200, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
Hi,
We [1] have noticed that there could be up to %50 performance gain on
using sd-bus over gdbus on dbus-daemon. For this reason, we
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
u...@tezduyar.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Simon McVittie
simon.mcvit...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
On 29/04/15 15:08, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
We [1] have noticed that there could be up to %50 performance
Hi,
We [1] have noticed that there could be up to %50 performance gain on
using sd-bus over gdbus on dbus-daemon. For this reason, we have high
interest in using sd-bus. What are the plans in terms of making sd-bus
API public?
Details of the test [2]:
gdbus.c
- g_dbus_proxy_new_for_bus_sync()
Hi,
There have been few discussions about tentative state and unmounting
and I am experiencing different problem in the same device logic.
I am at 219 + 628c89cc + 496068a8 + 5259bcf6
I have 2 mounts (one is bind mount) on mapper device.
/proc/self/mountinfo:
47 37 254:0 /
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:02 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Mon, 18.05.15 15:59, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
Hi,
There have been few discussions about tentative state and unmounting
and I am experiencing different problem in the same device
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Tue, 19.05.15 10:23, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Hello all,
I have a better fix now.
So the problem is that this tentative → dead transition only works if
a device is referenced once, but
101 - 200 of 266 matches
Mail list logo
