Re: t-and-f: Dark Day addenda

2002-12-05 Thread ghill
:24:53 -0600 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: t-and-f: Dark Day addenda > > As a professional media critic, I could expound for hours on this > subject. But I won't, because this is the TRACK AND FIELD newsgroup. > We're getting a little off-topic here, aren't we

Re: t-and-f: Dark Day addenda

2002-12-05 Thread Lee Nichols
As a professional media critic, I could expound for hours on this subject. But I won't, because this is the TRACK AND FIELD newsgroup. We're getting a little off-topic here, aren't we? If anyone wants the URL of the archive of my old media columns, I'll be happy to give it, but otherwise, maybe

Re: t-and-f: Dark Day addenda

2002-12-05 Thread J. Peters
malmo wrote: > Let's see if I got this straight: wealthy, insular white women, who live > in segregated buildings, eat at segregated restaurants, send their kids > to segregated schools, belong to segregated clubs and attend segregated > social events, are protesting Augusta's men-only policy so t

Re: t-and-f: Dark Day addenda

2002-12-05 Thread DLTFNedit
What bothers me is that almost all media outlets are owned by just a handful of corporations, such as News Corp (Fox), Sony, AOL-Time Warner, Disney, etc. Check this out for more: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/cool/giants/ What kind of objective reporting do you think they're do

RE: t-and-f: Dark Day addenda

2002-12-05 Thread malmo
ng? malmo Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bob Duncan Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 12:49 PM To: Track Listserve Subject: Re: t-and-f: Dark Day addenda Ed Grant wrote: > > My wife happens to belong to one of the consituent me

Re: t-and-f: Dark Day addenda

2002-12-05 Thread Bob Duncan
Ed Grant wrote: > > My wife happens to belong to one of the consituent members of this > organization. Her group was "taken over" by radical feminism with absolutely > no consultation of the hundreds of local groups spread around the country. > It just happened. And this is typical of the o

Re: t-and-f: Dark Day addenda

2002-12-05 Thread ghill
According to an AP story I saw this morning, the story that Anderson (and another staffer did one as well) wrote and got cut was because it violated the NYT's rule that the news and editorial sides not be critical of each other. Nobody said Anderson couldn't take a stance contrary to the editorial;