I think the simplest answer to the question why (only) 557 is that
most of us have migrated over to the Track and Field News Message
Board, which really satisfies every need that the t-and-f listserv
ever did, does more, and does it better.
The real question is why the 557 of us are still here,
Subject
Re: t-and-f: Why 557?
05/24/2006 06:59 AM
@lists.uoregon.edu
Subject: Re: t-and-f: Why 557?
...and does it better.
That's a matter of opinion. I preferred the old list, and I currently spend
very little time on the TF News website because of the web-based format. I
can't stand all that clicking forward and backward and (sometimes slow
The poor dear.
Here's a better description of the problem:
I agree, Kurt. One has to spend a lot of time checking dozens of different
forum topics to get all the news and comments, then the next time one wishes to
check, you have to go through it all again. No way to easily see only what you
Apologies if this comes through twice.
Roger, try asking the board a question-my guess is that you will get an
answer a lot quicker.
Kurt, if you were to familiarize yourself with the board and all its
functions(you strike me as a pretty smart guy, so it wouldn't take you
long), I think you
Kurt, if you were to familiarize yourself with the board and all its
functions(you strike me as a pretty smart guy, so it wouldn't take you
long), I think you would find that your objections are not valid.
I have familiarized myself with it. That's how I know it's a big pain in the
butt. With
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have familiarized myself with it.
With all due respect, obviously not completely. If you would have, you
wouldn't have passed on this illegitimate complaint:
I agree, Kurt. One has to spend a lot of time checking dozens of different
forum topics to get all the news
OK, now Roger has made me curious too. Where did the triple jump come
from?
Tom
On May 23, 2006, at 8:37 PM, Roger Ruth wrote:
Thanks to Ed, Travis, Drew, Tom, Wayne and Trey, and thanks again
to those who responded off-list, for their very enlightening
replies to my question Why 1500m,
