RE: t-and-f: re: Etiquette vs. Rules

2001-01-27 Thread Christopher Goss
I wrote: As I remember the Big Ten indoor rule (forgive me, I don't have a book in front of me), it states that lapped runners must leave the track until the race is down to a certain number of competitors. I checked the indoor section of the Big Ten rulebook last night. For the 3000 and

t-and-f: re: Etiquette vs. Rules

2001-01-26 Thread The Barretts
At the Big 10 indoors in '87 or so, Scott Fry ran 14:00 for 5k. Lapped runners were yanked by the officials. Including those on 14:40 pace! Not a large finishers list in that one. Seemed a bit harsh, but also seems wrong to force the fastest to slow down to deal with the slower. As someone said,

Re: t-and-f: re: Etiquette vs. Rules

2001-01-26 Thread GHTFNedit
In a message dated Fri, 26 Jan 2001 1:45:00 PM Eastern Standard Time, The Barretts [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Regarding relay splits: The Sac State track has (had?) the best setup I've seen for relay spectating/officiating, and an easy solution at that: different colored track in the relay

Re: t-and-f: re: Etiquette vs. Rules

2001-01-26 Thread Christopher Goss
the leaders to prevent disqualification from the race. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "The Barretts" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 1:32 PM Subject: t-and-f: re: Etiquette vs. Rules At the Big 10 indoors in '87 or so, Scott

Re: t-and-f: re: Etiquette vs. Rules

2001-01-26 Thread Ksully330
It is even more interesting when the lapped athletes refuse to step off the track and you get officials trying to physically remove them. Great entertainment. Kevin Sullivan In a message dated 1/26/01 2:31:46 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: As I remember the Big Ten

Re: t-and-f: re: Etiquette vs. Rules

2001-01-26 Thread Ed Dana Parrot
Christopher Goss wrote: As I remember the Big Ten indoor rule (forgive me, I don't have a book in front of me), it states that lapped runners must leave the track until the race is down to a certain number of competitors. My interpretation is that interference with the leaders is not the