Re: [Tagging] RFC: more barrier types

2010-09-21 Thread Simone Saviolo
2010/9/20 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com: If you miss something, please report here so that we can extend the proposal. I've never found an appropriate tag for those bollards that can retract down into the road. They're usually controlled by a remote, and they're often used to

Re: [Tagging] RFC: more barrier types

2010-09-21 Thread John Smith
On 21 September 2010 17:32, Simone Saviolo simone.savi...@gmail.com wrote: I've never found an appropriate tag for those bollards that can retract down into the road. They're usually controlled by a remote, and they're often used to prevent non-authorized traffic from entering a road (for

Re: [Tagging] RFC: more barrier types

2010-09-21 Thread John Smith
On 21 September 2010 17:32, Simone Saviolo simone.savi...@gmail.com wrote: I've never found an appropriate tag for those bollards that can barrier=bollard bollard=retractable|removeable|collapsible|flexible manual=yes/no ___ Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] RFC: more barrier types

2010-09-21 Thread Simone Saviolo
2010/9/21 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com: On 21 September 2010 17:32, Simone Saviolo simone.savi...@gmail.com wrote: I've never found an appropriate tag for those bollards that can barrier=bollard bollard=retractable|removeable|collapsible|flexible manual=yes/no Manual? Is this to

Re: [Tagging] RFC: more barrier types

2010-09-21 Thread John Smith
On 21 September 2010 18:28, Simone Saviolo simone.savi...@gmail.com wrote: Manual? Is this to differentiate between a) on-demand rectratable Manual as in they usually have a padlock or a built in key slot to manually retract or remove them, as opposed to some kind of motor operated mechanism...

Re: [Tagging] RFC: more barrier types

2010-09-21 Thread Simone Saviolo
2010/9/21 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com: On 21 September 2010 18:28, Simone Saviolo simone.savi...@gmail.com wrote: Manual? Is this to differentiate between a) on-demand rectratable Manual as in they usually have a padlock or a built in key slot to manually retract or remove them, as

Re: [Tagging] RFC: more barrier types

2010-09-21 Thread John Smith
On 21 September 2010 18:40, Simone Saviolo simone.savi...@gmail.com wrote: Should we also tag whether it can be remotely activated? Remote owners won't need this information (as they already have the remote), but the presence of a button or another device would be useful for those who don't

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - maze

2010-09-21 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/9/20 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com: That might cover mazes, but how about the rest of the amusement/theme park options? I'm think someone suggested attraction=maze the other day... In which case attraction=castle|dodgem_cars|ferris_wheel|water_slide|wave_pool|

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - maze

2010-09-21 Thread John Smith
On 21 September 2010 19:14, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: add your proposals there (or on the discussion pages). Attraction Done... obviously only in case we can agree that this key can also be used in parks and other contexts then playgrounds and theme parks. That page

Re: [Tagging] RFC: more barrier types

2010-09-21 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/9/21 Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com: On 21 September 2010 10:08, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: maybe you can spot a more technic term? I'm sure they have a proper name ;-) Wikipedia seems to think they're just a subset of a Jersey Barrier - mind you, even jersey

Re: [Tagging] RFC: more barrier types

2010-09-21 Thread Richard Welty
On 9/21/10 2:19 AM, Stephen Hope wrote: On 21 September 2010 10:08, M∡rtin Koppenhoeferdieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: maybe you can spot a more technic term? I'm sure they have a proper name ;-) Wikipedia seems to think they're just a subset of a Jersey Barrier - mind you, even jersey barrier

Re: [Tagging] RFC: more barrier types

2010-09-21 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/9/21 Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net:  On 9/21/10 2:19 AM, Stephen Hope wrote: maybe you can spot a more technic term? I'm sure they have a proper name http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jersey_barrier#Plastic_Jersey_barriers Wikipedia is a little disjointed on this. Attenuator is

Re: [Tagging] RFC: more barrier types

2010-09-21 Thread Richard Welty
On 9/21/10 7:08 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2010/9/21 Richard Weltyrwe...@averillpark.net: On 9/21/10 2:19 AM, Stephen Hope wrote: maybe you can spot a more technic term? I'm sure they have a proper name http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jersey_barrier#Plastic_Jersey_barriers Wikipedia is a

Re: [Tagging] RFC: more barrier types

2010-09-21 Thread John Smith
On 21 September 2010 21:25, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote: i'd say jersey_barrier is fine for the concrete, it's a more commonly known term than k-rail and nobody will be confused by it. but i'd use impact attenuator for the plastic sand/water filled barriers. They may be

Re: [Tagging] RFC: more barrier types

2010-09-21 Thread Dave F.
On 21/09/2010 01:08, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2010/9/21 John Smithdeltafoxtrot...@gmail.com: On 21 September 2010 09:57, M∡rtin Koppenhoeferdieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, which tag would you suggest? They are similar to guard rails IMHO Guard rails usually run parallel with the road,

Re: [Tagging] RFC: more barrier types

2010-09-21 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/9/21 Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net: i would note that jersey barrier refers to a specific type, which has two different slopes, designed to manage the direction in which vehicles hitting it go. that's the one I was aiming at. some of the plastic barrier systems do look like

Re: [Tagging] name:English, name:Español and lei sure:pitch pitch:? or sport:?

2010-09-21 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/9/21 Eric Jarvies e...@csl.com.mx: or is it?: leisure:pitch sport:baseball +1, generally this one. btw.: What do others use for swimming pools? leisure=pool? leisure=swimming_pool? leisure=pitch? cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] name:English, name:Español and lei sure:pitch pitch:? or sport:?

2010-09-21 Thread Richard Welty
On 9/21/10 8:49 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2010/9/21 Eric Jarviese...@csl.com.mx: or is it?: leisure:pitch sport:baseball +1, generally this one. btw.: What do others use for swimming pools? leisure=pool? leisure=swimming_pool? leisure=pitch? leisure=pitch would be problematic. some

Re: [Tagging] name:English, name:Español and lei sure:pitch pitch:? or sport:?

2010-09-21 Thread Brad Neuhauser
I've used leisure=swimming_pool. Using just pool seems ambiguous, and using pitch (i.e. field) for water just seems too weird. Brad On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 7:49 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: 2010/9/21 Eric Jarvies e...@csl.com.mx: or is it?: leisure:pitch

Re: [Tagging] name:English, name:Español and lei sure:pitch pitch:? or sport:?

2010-09-21 Thread David Paleino
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 06:32:30 -0600, Eric Jarvies wrote: Is this how to tag them?; name:English Name name:es:Español Or do I need to do this: name:English Name name:es es:Español name=Name in English name:es=Nombre en Español David -- . ''`. Debian developer |

Re: [Tagging] name:English, name:Español and l eisure:pitch pitch:? or sport:?

2010-09-21 Thread Eric Jarvies
On Sep 21, 2010, at 8:28 AM, David Paleino wrote: On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 06:32:30 -0600, Eric Jarvies wrote: Is this how to tag them?; name:English Name name:es:Español Or do I need to do this: name:English Name name:es es:Español name=Name in English name:es=Nombre en Español

Re: [Tagging] name:English, name:Español and leisure:pitch pitch:? or sport:?

2010-09-21 Thread charlie
Brad Neuhauser (brad.neuhau...@gmail.com) wrote: I've used leisure=swimming_pool. Using just pool seems ambiguous, and using pitch (i.e. field) for water just seems too weird. Brad Ditto. Though mapnik doesn't seem to render leisure=swimming_pool, which is a shame. -- Charlie

Re: [Tagging] name:English, name:Español and lei sure:pitch pitch:? or sport:?

2010-09-21 Thread David Paleino
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 08:41:22 -0600, Eric Jarvies wrote: On Sep 21, 2010, at 8:28 AM, David Paleino wrote: On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 06:32:30 -0600, Eric Jarvies wrote: Is this how to tag them?; name:English Name name:es:Español Or do I need to do this: name:English Name name:es

Re: [Tagging] name:English, name:Español and l eisure:pitch pitch:? or sport:?

2010-09-21 Thread Richard Weait
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Eric Jarvies e...@csl.com.mx wrote: On Sep 21, 2010, at 8:28 AM, David Paleino wrote: On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 06:32:30 -0600, Eric Jarvies wrote: Is this how to tag them?; name:English Name name:es:Español Or do I need to do this: name:English Name name:es

Re: [Tagging] name:English, name:Español and leisure:pitch pitch:? or sport:?

2010-09-21 Thread charlie
David Paleino (da...@debian.org) wrote: On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 06:32:30 -0600, Eric Jarvies wrote: Is this how to tag them?; name:English Name name:es:Español Or do I need to do this: name:English Name name:es es:Español name=Name in English name:es=Nombre en Español Is that right? I'd

Re: [Tagging] name:English, name:Español and lei sure:pitch pitch:? or sport:?

2010-09-21 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/9/21 char...@cferrero.net: Brad Neuhauser (brad.neuhau...@gmail.com) wrote: I've used leisure=swimming_pool.  Using just pool seems ambiguous, and using pitch (i.e. field) for water just seems too weird. Ditto.  Though mapnik doesn't seem to render leisure=swimming_pool, which is a

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - maze

2010-09-21 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/9/21 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com: On 21 September 2010 19:14, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: add your proposals there (or on the discussion pages). Attraction Done... obviously only in case we can agree that this key can also be used in parks and other

Re: [Tagging] name:English, name:Español and lei sure:pitch pitch:? or sport:?

2010-09-21 Thread David Paleino
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 15:51:33 +0100, char...@cferrero.net wrote: David Paleino (da...@debian.org) wrote: On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 06:32:30 -0600, Eric Jarvies wrote: Is this how to tag them?; name:English Name name:es:Español Or do I need to do this: name:English Name name:es

[Tagging] Tagging a currently-closed public athletic field

2010-09-21 Thread John F. Eldredge
Nashville, Tennessee, USA was hit by a thousand-year flood on May 1st and May 2nd, 2010 (that is, a flood severe enough that is unlikely to occur more than once in a thousand-year period). One of the consequences was that a small park, containing a softball field used mostly by children's

Re: [Tagging] Tagging a currently-closed public athletic field

2010-09-21 Thread Sean Horgan
John, Here is an approach that I took for a similar situation. I tagged some buildings that were damaged from Hurricane Ike in Galveston Texas as disused=yes and I place a note saying why. Here is an example of one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/914783304 I've heard others suggest

Re: [Tagging] Tagging a currently-closed public athletic field

2010-09-21 Thread John Smith
On 22 September 2010 06:45, Sean Horgan seanhor...@gmail.com wrote: I've heard others suggest updating the current tag, such as amenity=disused. The only problem with that is it would obscure any amenities that may have been damaged that they're planning to fix etc, I'd stick with disused=yes

Re: [Tagging] Tagging a currently-closed public athletic field

2010-09-21 Thread Sean Horgan
agreed. I prefer disused=yes myself but I wanted to at least mention another approach I've read. On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 15:45, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: On 22 September 2010 06:45, Sean Horgan seanhor...@gmail.com wrote: I've heard others suggest updating the current tag,

Re: [Tagging] Tagging a currently-closed public athletic field

2010-09-21 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 6:45 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: On 22 September 2010 06:45, Sean Horgan seanhor...@gmail.com wrote: I've heard others suggest updating the current tag, such as amenity=disused. The only problem with that is it would obscure any amenities that may