2012/7/25 fly :
> On 25/07/12 14:00, LM_1 wrote:
>> 2012/7/25 Jason Cunningham :
>>> On 24 July 2012 19:55, David ``Smith'' wrote:
Useful to whom? The local fire department should already know, and nobody
else should be authorized to open the hydrant anyway — though it seems the
>>>
I thought it would be a good thing to at öleast pass the proposal-phase for
the tag emergency=aed
#The value aed seem to be the agreed value, it is a abbrevation of Automatic
External Defibrillator (An AED is a device designed for the layman to treat
life threatening cardiac arrhythmias).
#The
[Moved from dev]
At 2012-07-26 01:42, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>Alan Mintz wrote:
>> Semi-colons are the agreed-upon way to provide multiple values for a
>> field. It seems wrong to "warn" of their use, especially given the
>> demonstrated potential to cause users to "fix" such values incorrectly
Sometimes there is a discussion on how to tag differnt kind of awards and
ratings.
I thoguht a bit of this http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Johan_J%C3%
B6nsson/Workspace#some_musings_on_the_subject
and came up with a pre-draft that I might take further if there is any
interest:
http://wi
In my opinion there should be some common prefix (award, rating, does
not really matter). That way it is clear what it means even if one
does not know that particular rating system. That would probably not
be the case with Michelin stars, but most rating systems are less
famous.
With prefix a sensi
At 2012-07-26 10:10, Johan =?utf-8?b?SsO2bnNzb24=?= wrote:
Sometimes there is a discussion on how to tag differnt kind of awards and
ratings.
...
It is basically like this
=
With a catchy name for the award_system as key
and for each award_system there could be a list of values
...
example 4
In
Hi,
On 26.07.2012 19:10, Johan Jönsson wrote:
Sometimes there is a discussion on how to tag differnt kind of awards and
ratings.
It is possible that the organisation publishing the ratings has some
sort of copyright or database right to them. For example I don't think
it will be legal to cop
At 2012-07-26 14:43, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 26.07.2012 19:10, Johan Jönsson wrote:
Sometimes there is a discussion on how to tag differnt kind of awards and
ratings.
It is possible that the organisation publishing the ratings has some sort
of copyright or database right to them. For exa
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Johan Jönsson wrote:
[..]
> example 1
> Tripadvisor have some awards called Travelers' Choice
> If someone of some reason would like to tag that, they can use
> travelers_choice=top25 / best_service
I think it's better to just link to the TripAdvisor page. I
Hi,
On 26.07.2012 23:57, Alan Mintz wrote:
It is possible that the organisation publishing the ratings has some
sort of copyright or database right to them. For example I don't think
it will be legal to copy TripAdvisor ratings into OSM.
This may be an FAQ, but if a shop posts their awards in
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Johan Jönsson
> wrote:
> [..]
> > example 1
> > Tripadvisor have some awards called Travelers' Choice
> > If someone of some reason would like to tag that, they can use
> > travelers_choice=top25
At 2012-07-26 15:11, Frederik Ramm wrote:
On 26.07.2012 23:57, Alan Mintz wrote:
It is possible that the organisation publishing the ratings has some
sort of copyright or database right to them. For example I don't think
it will be legal to copy TripAdvisor ratings into OSM.
This may be an FAQ
Hi,
On 27.07.2012 00:28, Alan Mintz wrote:
At least in Germany, a photographer may not photograph anything in
public view and claim ownership; it is possible that photographing
e.g. a work of art and then using that photo requires consent from the
rights holder even though the object was in publ
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Apollinaris Schöll wrote:
> Even linking is of questionable use. OSM should be turned into a replication
> of the whole info available in the internet. soon we will have a single POI
> with a link to Wikipedia, Michelin, Zagat, Facebook, their own native
> hom
Am 27.07.2012 00:11, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
At least in Germany, a photographer may not photograph anything in
public view and claim ownership; it is possible that photographing
e.g. a work of art and then using that photo requires consent from the
rights holder even though the object was in pu
15 matches
Mail list logo
