more details and requirements for the correct use of the can be found on
this wiki page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Duse_sidepath
regards
m
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Hubert wrote:
> Hey,
>
> could someone remind me on how bicycle=use_sidepath is supposed to be
> use
Only when the cycleway is drawn as separate way.
Jo
2014-10-07 23:20 GMT+02:00 Hubert :
> Hey,
>
> could someone remind me on how bicycle=use_sidepath is supposed to be
> used. E.g. Always on highway=road if a compulsory cycle way is present or
> only when this cycle way is tagged as a separate
Sent from my iPad
> On Oct 7, 2014, at 10:08 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
>
> 2014-10-07 14:57 GMT+02:00 johnw :
>> For example, I'm a foreign resident in Japan. I have to visit the regional
>> offices to renew my visa every year or so. It's always a busy place people
>> have to find
Hallo.
First of all, thank you to everyone how commented on the proposal and
helped me to improve it. Since there are no more additions in the last days
(and I don't know what else I could add) if have change the status to
"Voting". The page can be found here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wi
Hey,
could someone remind me on how bicycle=use_sidepath is supposed to be used.
E.g. Always on highway=road if a compulsory cycle way is present or only when
this cycle way is tagged as a separate OSM-way.
Best Regard
Hubert
> -Original Message-
> From: 715371 [mailto:osmu715...@gmx.d
Hi Martin,
OK, well since you requested comments: Firstly, I find it difficult to
understand what makes your proposed split more "coherent" or "easy to
learn" than thewiki- grouping that you propose to revert! By the way
please don't start a revert battle without first talking to that
editor.
Sec
"Now recently, the zoom rules between mud and sand/beach have diverged." -
I consider this as a bug and
I plan on fixing it in the near future (see
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1018 ).
2014-10-07 16:49 GMT+02:00 Malcolm Herring :
> +1 if it means that the rendering o
+1 if it means that the rendering of these features is done according to
whatever is agreed. I have a particular interest in coastal and tidal
riverbank areas. I had tagged some such areas some years ago according
to the Wiki and the rendering was as expected. Since the introduction of
Carto, t
Hi Martin, regarding the wiki page, I'm assuming you're talking about
Frankthetankk's edits? I'm not seeing what the issue is. Could you clarify
what change you see as disputable? Thanks, Brad
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
>
> Additionally I have spotted that rece
I hope we can come to some sort of agreement on this topic as there are
many large parcels of land here in Thailand that serve various "government"
functions. It seems every time I notice a big, well appointed structure
over here my Thai partner tells me "that's a government building."
Irrigation a
According to the wiki, the natural key is currently a mixture of different
aspects of something. The wiki states that it covers a selection of
"geological" and "landcover" features.
My suggestion is to keep only geological/geographical features in "natural"
(all three, point features like peak and
2014-10-07 14:57 GMT+02:00 johnw :
> For example, I'm a foreign resident in Japan. I have to visit the regional
> offices to renew my visa every year or so. It's always a busy place people
> have to find. It's not at the city hall, the airport or a border - but it
> is a really important governmen
On Oct 5, 2014, at 6:57 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> Il giorno 04/ott/2014, alle ore 06:58, johnw ha scritto:
>>
>> Usually the government services are monopolistic - courts, police, elected
>> officials (there's only 1 mayor) tax offices, DMV, etc, whereas NGO s and
>> non-
13 matches
Mail list logo
