Here's the link to the proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Proposed_features/Obligatory_vs._optional_cycletrack
2014-12-22 6:24 GMT+01:00 Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com:
No, no, no.
In my opinion, there are a few nos missing here. So I'll add at least one
more: no. Well,
2014-12-22 6:24 GMT+01:00 Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com
mailto:matkoni...@gmail.com:
No, no, no.
In my opinion, there are a few nos missing here. So I'll add at least
one more: no. Well, make that two: No.
Let me add several nos:
No, no, no, no, NO!
Reasons have already been
2014-12-19 20:53 GMT+01:00 Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at:
I am happy with current rendering, and I want to keep that when the names
are stripped. The OSM mapnik layer will hopefully add the amin_name to the
border labels, so that Gutenbrunn will show up as Gemeinde Gutenbrunn
again, or as
Hi,
what is the legal situation in different countries - is Germany one
of a very small number of countries that has this concept of if there
is a certain type of cycleway than cyclists must not use the road, or
is this quite common?
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail
In Sweden it also generally not allowed to cycle on the road if a cycleway
are present. There are some exeptions to this rule, but one cyclist
actually got judged recently for violating this law.
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
what is the
In NL I think it is similar to Germany. The definition of the sign is
verplicht fietspad i.e. compulsory cycle track. When the cycle track
runs adjacent to a road the intention is clear, but the sign is
interestingly also used for cycle paths through the middle of the
countryside with no
The need to distinguish between obligatory and optional cycle ways is quite
common. Right now it's done by distinguishing between
bicycle=official/designated and bicycle=yes or bicycle=official and
bicycle=designated/yes.
In a similar way, I think it is better to use something like
In Belgium the cyclist always have to use the cycleway, except
- the path is in bad condition (glass, snow, holes, ...)
- Children on small bikes
- groups of cyclists.
- for some special turns (see page 10 of
I would confirm this.
Except Mofas (German abbreviation for Motor Fahrrad) don’t count as bicycle in
germany. They may use cycle way in rural areas (outside of Cities, Towns,
Villages) or if it is explicitly allowed
(http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Zusatzzeichen_1022-11.svg).
Yours
In France the situation exists. Two signs are designed for this (but
not well understood by people and even sometimes misused by
authorities):
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Road_signs_in_France
Sign B22a (round, blue) = compulsory / mandatory / obligatory
Bicycles MUST use, bicycles not
On 22/12/2014 9:09 PM, tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
2014-12-22 6:24 GMT+01:00 Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com
mailto:matkoni...@gmail.com:
No, no, no.
In my opinion, there are a few nos missing here. So I'll add at least
one more: no. Well, make that two: No.
Let me
Martin Vonwald (Imagic) wrote:
Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
No, no, no.
In my opinion, there are a few nos missing here. So I'll add at least
one more: no. Well, make that two: No.
...there's no limit...
Richard
--
View this message in context:
2014-12-22 13:58 GMT+01:00 Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net:
Martin Vonwald (Imagic) wrote:
Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
No, no, no.
In my opinion, there are a few nos missing here. So I'll add at least
one more: no. Well, make that two: No.
...there's no limit...
Oh my 1992...
On 22/12/2014 11:00 PM, tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 12:53:53 +0100
From: Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Obligatory vs.
Note, there is also bicycle=use_sidepath created for this purpose.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Duse_sidepath
2014-12-22 14:50 GMT+01:00 Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com:
On 22/12/2014 11:00 PM, tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 12:53:53 +0100
2014-12-22 14:50 GMT+01:00 Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com:
I think the only need for 'obligatory cycleway' is to remove bicyclist
from certain roads! e.g.
I'm bicycling north to south.. there is an obligatory cycleway 1000 kms
west of me ..
Do I have to use it? No. Totally unreasonable.
Or is
Well, you don’t need it for routing purposes (if bicycle=use_sidepath is used
in a certain way). But there are cases where you want do render “compulsory”
and “optional” cycle ways in a different ways (e.g. dark blue and light blue).
But in order to do that you need the information. Either as
Hi, I saw that a user recently added a suggestion in the wikipage Key:source
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source to add the date of the
source of the object in a separate tag called source:date=*.
Example:
source=survey
source:date=2014-08-15
Another example:
source:name=XYZ
I always use the tag combination source=survey ; survey:date=year-month-day
as described on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:survey:date
I place this on the changeset
m.
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 8:03 PM, jgpacker john.pack...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I saw that a user recently added a
On 22.12.2014 10:32, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
What about Marktgemeinde Gutenbrunn (that's what they call themselves on
their official homepage)?
No, that's advertising language, they are showing off their market right in
order to impress their visitors and to attract investors.
--
Friedrich
Traditional paper cartography has good visual solution for this, including
symbols for trails that become indistinct.
These symbols are quite useful, not supported in Google Maps, and I'd like
to bring them to OSM.
--
In our case there should
As we have tags for different kind of *lane the only problem is
cycleway=track.
Now we have two solutions:
1. deprecate cycleway=track in favour of cycleway=*_track
2. add a new key like bicycle_track=*
My two cents
fly
Am 22.12.2014 um 12:30 schrieb Hubert:
The need to distinguish between
Am 22.12.2014 um 02:20 schrieb Ulrich Lamm:
I've written a proposal for the tags cycleway=obligatory and
cycleway=optional.
I am still against this tag as I mentioned several times.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Which would not help in my case, as I work for several days on the same
survey.
m
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org wrote:
On 12/22/2014 08:28 PM, Marc Gemis wrote:
I always use the tag combination source=survey ;
survey:date=year-month-day
as described on
cycleway=track
I propose to treat this tag as a special case of fixme - it indicates
some sort of cycleway parallel to road, without any additional details.
In theory it is possible to add tags that specify surface, side of road,
width by tags like cycleway:track:left:surface, but it is
25 matches
Mail list logo
