Re: [Tagging] Tagging for palapa

That looks like a good direction. From the wiki [1] amenity=shelter (>139,000 uses[2]) seems correct. No entry for shelter_type for palapa, but shelter_type=sun_shelter[3] (even with only 152 total uses[4]) is probably close enough. Thanks! [1]

Re: [Tagging] Tagging for palapa

what about amenity=shelter + shelter_type=palapa ? On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 12:51 AM, Alejandro S. wrote: > Loos like building=roof + new tag for refinement? > > Atentamente, > Alejandro Suárez > > On 24 July 2016 at 22:22, Tod Fitch wrote: >> >>

Re: [Tagging] Tagging for palapa

Loos like building=roof + new tag for refinement? Atentamente, Alejandro Suárez On 24 July 2016 at 22:22, Tod Fitch wrote: > There are some structures on a beach I’d like to tag which I believe are > called a palapa [1]. Not my photos, but there are images of others on

[Tagging] Tagging for palapa

There are some structures on a beach I’d like to tag which I believe are called a palapa [1]. Not my photos, but there are images of others on the web, for instance [2] and [3]. I don’t see anything under ‘palapa' in the wiki. And while there are some things I see in taginfo that have “palapa”

Re: [Tagging] Artworks inside the Louvre

2016-07-24 14:03 GMT+02:00 tomoya muramoto : > I think "public art" is not related to indoor/outdoor basically. > +1 > My opinion for this kind of tagging is: > *In the area of "tourism=museum", "artwork_type=*"(without > tourism=artwork) is enough to specify it is

Re: [Tagging] Artworks inside the Louvre

"tourism=artwork" is used for "public art". I think "public art" is not related to indoor/outdoor basically. There are many "indoor public art" and "outdoor private art". An artwork in an entrance hall of a city hall is "public art" I think. This museum has many outdoor artworks in its private

Re: [Tagging] Artworks inside the Louvre

sent from a phone > Il giorno 24 lug 2016, alle ore 11:38, Simon Poole ha > scritto: > > Isn't this a bit of a non-question, given that neither the indoor, nor > the level tag is currently imported in to the rendering database, so you > really only have the option of testing

Re: [Tagging] Artworks inside the Louvre

Some exceptions? Some could be on the roof .. and therefore 'outside' and visible from outside. Some could be visible through a large glass 'window' from the outside. the On 7/24/2016 7:38 PM, Simon Poole wrote: Isn't this a bit of a non-question, given that neither the indoor, nor the

Re: [Tagging] Artworks inside the Louvre

Isn't this a bit of a non-question, given that neither the indoor, nor the level tag is currently imported in to the rendering database, so you really only have the option of testing if the object in question is in a building outline or not (which may be a bit expensive). Simon Am 24.07.2016 um

Re: [Tagging] Artworks inside the Louvre

In my opinion, adding indoor=yes on every single indoor object doesn't make sense, as we know they are indoors because they are inside a building area and possibly have some indoor tags like level=*. Le 24/07/2016 à 00:42, Daniel Koć a écrit : We are on the way to render artworks on osm-carto