Re: [Tagging] Disaster response

2017-04-25 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 24. Apr 2017, at 21:34, Micah Cochran wrote: > > Existing features that are slightly similar: > 1. amenity=shelter with shelter_type=weather_shelter is for a wilderness hut > to get out of the rain or a thunderstorm. > 2. amenity=social_facility + social_facility=shelt

Re: [Tagging] "Feature Proposal - RFC - (office=courier)"

2017-04-25 Thread Tobias Wrede
Am 25.04.2017 um 11:21 schrieb John Willis: If I search for a supermarket and you send me to a 7-11, you failed. Post offices have different scopes in different places, ways we usually separate by tag, because we separate "duckiness" by tag. This varies by region, so we need a way to represent

Re: [Tagging] "Feature Proposal - RFC - (office=courier)"

2017-04-25 Thread Tobias Wrede
Am 25.04.2017 um 10:29 schrieb Marc Gemis: On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Tobias Wrede wrote: With this proposal how would I tag an amenity that sells stamps, offers registered mail, receives parcels but does not accept commercial mass mail and does not offer banking services? It's not a "tr

Re: [Tagging] about landcover/landcover=grass

2017-04-25 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 25. Apr 2017, at 07:06, muzirian wrote: > > Doesnt surface=grass work? yes, it "works", but isn't typically considered a feature but a property, I would still expect that some other tag says what it "is" cheers, Martin __

Re: [Tagging] "Feature Proposal - RFC - (office=courier)"

2017-04-25 Thread John Willis
Javbw > On Apr 25, 2017, at 4:17 PM, Tobias Wrede wrote: > > operator or brand This is about scope, not brand or operator. If I search for a supermarket and you send me to a 7-11, you failed. Post offices have different scopes in different places, ways we usually separate by tag, becau

Re: [Tagging] "Feature Proposal - RFC - (office=courier)"

2017-04-25 Thread Marc Gemis
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Tobias Wrede wrote: > With this proposal how would I tag an amenity that sells stamps, offers > registered mail, receives parcels but does not accept commercial mass mail > and does not offer banking services? It's not a "traditional post office". amenity=courier

Re: [Tagging] "Feature Proposal - RFC - (office=courier)"

2017-04-25 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 25. Apr 2017, at 05:13, Marc Gemis wrote: > > I still believe that for the feature at hand it is enough to have > amenity=courier, just so we can distinguish it from the traditional > postal_office. I also believe we should have a tagging scheme for various kinds of co

Re: [Tagging] "Feature Proposal - RFC - (office=courier)"

2017-04-25 Thread Tobias Wrede
Am 25.04.2017 um 05:13 schrieb Marc Gemis: I still believe that for the feature at hand it is enough to have amenity=courier, just so we can distinguish it from the traditional postal_office. Do we need subtags for courier yet ? I do not think so. We are mapping supermarkets/convenience stores w