Re: [Tagging] Flower fields as tourism attraction

On 12/04/18 15:35, Marc Gemis wrote: If it is not landuse=flower_bed,what is the landuse tag then ? The land is used for something, not ? So even when you tag it as landcover (or man_made) = flower_bed, I would still expect to be able to add a landuse tag as well. Yes... for things like a lilly

Re: [Tagging] Flower fields as tourism attraction

If it is not landuse=flower_bed,what is the landuse tag then ? The land is used for something, not ? So even when you tag it as landcover (or man_made) = flower_bed, I would still expect to be able to add a landuse tag as well. m. On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 12:04 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wr

[Tagging] Cafe run as outreach project

How do you tag a cafe (or any other amenity) that is run as part of an outreach project ? The cafe is available to everyone, but the employees are part of an outreach project (e.g. people with disabilities). Thanks in advance m. ___ Tagging mailing lis

Re: [Tagging] Flower fields as tourism attraction

Javbw On Apr 12, 2018, at 7:04 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: >> You don't play sports on them. People grow flowers in dedicated land merely >> to be enjoyed. > > Or to cut up and placed inside for decoration and smell. You can't nest landuses? We nest every other type of area. I

Re: [Tagging] Flower fields as tourism attraction

sent from a phone > On 11. Apr 2018, at 23:23, John Willis wrote: > > I need another tag that says "this area here visible in imagery is decorative > flowers". This exact 5m2 Or 100m2. If that is landuse=flower_bed or > man_made=flowerbed or whatever, I would choose man_made for this, not

Re: [Tagging] Flower fields as tourism attraction

On 11/04/18 19:30, John Willis wrote: Actual flower Farms are landuse=farmland crop=flowers. Yea, they may have a viewpoint and a gift shop. But those large commercial farms are not what I'm talking about. These are about tagging the actual beds of decorative flowers with landuse=flowerbed (w

Re: [Tagging] Flower fields as tourism attraction

Javbw > On Apr 11, 2018, at 7:37 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: > > An area with decorative flowers organized and presented in flowerbeds, with > visitors and maybe a fee, will be something, like a flower show, with a name, > maybe a website etc. That is the overall Garden. Garden:type=

Re: [Tagging] Railways along streets

Do as done on trams. highway=* with railway=rail. > > >> All the best >> >> François >> >> *François Lacombe* >> >> fl dot infosreseaux At gmail dot com >> www.infos-reseaux.com >> @InfosReseaux >> >> 2018-04-11 0:48 GMT+02:00 Pau

Re: [Tagging] Railways along streets

On 11 April 2018 at 12:47, François Lacombe wrote: > I would definetly map it with 2 distinct ways. > They can both share the same nodes, or map the road as two "oneway" > highways with the railway between both directions > +1 to mapping tehm as separate ways. If traffic can physically cross fro

Re: [Tagging] Railways along streets

One downside of mapping the railway on a separate layer is that intersecting streets would be neglected, such as S Main St at the next intersection. S Main St actually crosses the rail and some part of that intersection should probably be tagged with info about the rail crossing (i.e. they should s

Re: [Tagging] Railways along streets

On 2018-04-11 13:47, François Lacombe wrote: > I would definetly map it with 2 distinct ways. > They can both share the same nodes, or map the road as two "oneway" > highways with the railway between both directions Good idea sharing nodes, that's doable but a bit tricky with JOSM. I wonder about o

Re: [Tagging] Railways along streets

I would definetly map it with 2 distinct ways. They can both share the same nodes, or map the road as two "oneway" highways with the railway between both directions All the best François *François Lacombe* fl dot infosreseaux At gmail dot com www.infos-reseaux.com @InfosReseaux

Re: [Tagging] Flower fields as tourism attraction

2018-04-11 11:30 GMT+02:00 John Willis : > Actual flower Farms are landuse=farmland crop=flowers. Yea, they may have > a viewpoint and a gift shop. But those large commercial farms are not what > I'm talking about. > > These are about tagging the actual beds of decorative flowers with > landuse=fl

Re: [Tagging] Flower fields as tourism attraction

> On Apr 10, 2018, at 11:09 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: > > they are. A flowerbed is about something human made. What you have been > posting is a forest +1 There are many natural spectacles (the fall colors on the mountains, certian flowers that grow on wild hills, etc) that is a fo

Re: [Tagging] Flower fields as tourism attraction

Actual flower Farms are landuse=farmland crop=flowers. Yea, they may have a viewpoint and a gift shop. But those large commercial farms are not what I'm talking about. These are about tagging the actual beds of decorative flowers with landuse=flowerbed (which I think is totally a landuse - it

Re: [Tagging] RFC: intelligence facility

sent from a phone > On 11. Apr 2018, at 07:34, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Are they under the military or under the civilian government? > > How does OSM separate out other government/military departments? some are military, some are governmental, and some seem to be sth on the