Re: [Tagging] landuse=clearing

2018-08-03 Thread Warin
I have made a rough draft on the OSM wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Landcover%3Dclearing#Proposal Later. On 04/08/18 09:43, Warin wrote: On 29/07/18 20:56, Andy Townsend wrote: What I've tended to do with clearings is: o natural=wood for "here be trees", with leaf_type added. o If

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - man_made - footwear_decontamination

2018-08-03 Thread Warin
Hi, The proposed feature "footwear decontamination stations" is open for voting: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/man_made%3Dfootwear_decontamination#Voting A tag to indicate the presence of a footwear decontamination station for hikers.

[Tagging] iD news - v2.10.0 with OSM Notes and more

2018-08-03 Thread Bryan Housel
We released iD v2.10.0 last week!  OSM Notes You can now create, comment on, and resolve OpenStreetMap notes from within iD! This work was done as part of Thomas Hervey's 2018 Google Summer of Code project, and you can read about it in his diary here:

Re: [Tagging] landuse=clearing

2018-08-03 Thread Warin
On 29/07/18 20:56, Andy Townsend wrote: What I've tended to do with clearings is: o natural=wood for "here be trees", with leaf_type added. o If there's a large "landuse=forest" area already and that encompasses wood, clearings, ponds etc. (and there often is), leave that as "landuse=forest"

Re: [Tagging] Lane geometry in OSM

2018-08-03 Thread Tom Hardy
On Friday, 3 August 2018 16:35:21 CDT Jmapb wrote: > > (Sorry, did a private reply...) The accepted answer posted here: > > https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/64617/how-to-map-center-turn-lanes > > is simply: > [...] Thanks! -- Tom Hardy

Re: [Tagging] Lane geometry in OSM

2018-08-03 Thread Jmapb
On 8/3/2018 5:31 PM, Tom Hardy wrote: On Friday, 3 August 2018 15:39:09 CDT Lionel Giard wrote: You can tag it with : lanes=3 lanes:forward=1 lanes:backward=2 turn:lanes:backward=left|through and split the way where the two arrows are located, and inverse the tagging on the other segment

Re: [Tagging] Lane geometry in OSM

2018-08-03 Thread Tom Hardy
On Friday, 3 August 2018 15:39:09 CDT Lionel Giard wrote: > You can tag it with : > lanes=3 > lanes:forward=1 > lanes:backward=2 > turn:lanes:backward=left|through > > and split the way where the two arrows are located, and inverse the tagging > on the other segment (put the lanes:forward=2;

Re: [Tagging] Lane geometry in OSM

2018-08-03 Thread Lionel Giard
> Also, I often see a center lane for left turns in both directions, as in > https://ecn.t0.tiles.virtualearth.net/tiles/a0213330110033323031.jpeg?g= 6570 > That's next on my list. It's currently tagged as a two lane road just a > bit west of the intersection I referred to earlier. Note the

Re: [Tagging] Lane geometry in OSM

2018-08-03 Thread Tom Hardy
On Friday, 3 August 2018 09:49:07 CDT you wrote: > On Friday, 3 August 2018 06:11:48 CDT Lionel Giard wrote: > > If you look at the wiki page about different lanes tagging ( > > > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes ), you can see that a suggested > > way of tagging (in

Re: [Tagging] Flood mark or high water mark

2018-08-03 Thread Robert Szczepanek
W dniu 26.07.2018 o 12:43, Warin pisze: Some flood marks carry a number of different heights from different dates. Would be good to map those too. We map them and split into several nodes at the same place: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4381386159

Re: [Tagging] Flood mark or high water mark

2018-08-03 Thread Robert Szczepanek
W dniu 26.07.2018 o 12:29, Andrew Davidson pisze: On 25/07/18 22:05, Robert Szczepanek wrote: Question 2: Which tagging convention should we follow: a/ flood_mark=yes + historic=memorial + memorial:type=flood_mark b/ historic=flood_mark + flood_mark:type=(plaque, painted, ...) c/

Re: [Tagging] Lane geometry in OSM

2018-08-03 Thread djakk djakk
:-) Le ven. 3 août 2018 à 17:07, Simon Poole a écrit : > > > Am 03.08.2018 um 16:30 schrieb djakk djakk: > > I think it is less verbose. > > That isn't necessarily a positive (just as in programming languages). > > > There can be multiple ways to express something in osm, like in the Ruby >

Re: [Tagging] Lane geometry in OSM

2018-08-03 Thread Simon Poole
Am 03.08.2018 um 16:30 schrieb djakk djakk: > I think it is less verbose.  > That isn't necessarily a positive (just as in programming languages). > There can be multiple ways to express something in osm, like in the > Ruby language ? > While that is certainly the case in OSM, introducing

Re: [Tagging] Lane geometry in OSM

2018-08-03 Thread Tom Hardy
On Friday, 3 August 2018 06:11:48 CDT Lionel Giard wrote: > If you look at the wiki page about different lanes tagging ( > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes ), you can see that a suggested > way of tagging (in "Examples/Motorways") is using letter to indicate which > lane goes to where

Re: [Tagging] Lane geometry in OSM

2018-08-03 Thread djakk djakk
I think it is less verbose. There can be multiple ways to express something in osm, like in the Ruby language ? djakk Le ven. 3 août 2018 à 16:21, Marc Gemis a écrit : > while this might work, why would you try to replace an established > tagging system ? > The tagging system turn:lanes:xxx

Re: [Tagging] Lane geometry in OSM

2018-08-03 Thread Marc Gemis
while this might work, why would you try to replace an established tagging system ? The tagging system turn:lanes:xxx is supported by several data consumers (OsmAnd, maps.me, MagicEarth and probably others). In many countries people worked on tagging all roads with this system after a project set

Re: [Tagging] Lane geometry in OSM

2018-08-03 Thread djakk djakk
Hello ! What about a tagging method like this : lanes=3 lane_2=forward_direction;left_turn or lanes=3 lane_2:direction=forward lane_2:turn=left instead of lanes=3 lanes:forward=2 turn:lanes:forward=left|through ? djakk Le ven. 3 août 2018 à 13:13, Lionel Giard a écrit : > If you

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Line clamps

2018-08-03 Thread Paul Allen
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 10:58 AM, François Lacombe wrote: > Hi Paul, > > 2018-08-02 14:17 GMT+02:00 Paul Allen : > >> Yeah, all you could do with that one is line_clamp=mixed. The >> down/up/down situation you could maybe handle as >> line_clamp=suspension;pin;suspension. >> > > Good point. It

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Winter service

2018-08-03 Thread Jyri-Petteri Paloposki
Hi, I noticed that there was a stalled feature proposal originally made by malenki for winter service tagging, and I'd like to propose the same myself amended with my proposals. Currently tagging of winter service is mostly done by the tag snowplowing=*, but that only covers one aspect of winter

Re: [Tagging] Lane geometry in OSM

2018-08-03 Thread Lionel Giard
If you look at the wiki page about different lanes tagging ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes ), you can see that a suggested way of tagging (in "Examples/Motorways") is using letter to indicate which lane goes to where (when there is a transition). This could be used to extent the width

Re: [Tagging] Lane geometry in OSM

2018-08-03 Thread Lionel Giard
If you look at the wiki page about different lanes tagging ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes ), you can see that a suggested w 2018-08-02 23:56 GMT+02:00 Tom Hardy : > I've experimented a bit with lane and road attributes as in > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505256201 and the

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Line clamps

2018-08-03 Thread François Lacombe
Hi Paul, 2018-08-02 14:17 GMT+02:00 Paul Allen : > Yeah, all you could do with that one is line_clamp=mixed. The > down/up/down situation you could maybe handle as > line_clamp=suspension;pin;suspension. > Good point. It would be pretty easy to describe complex configurations as matrix. I've