Oct 14, 2022, 03:31 by dieterdre...@gmail.com:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 13 Oct 2022, at 21:50, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
>> wrote:
>>
>> Field is landuse=farmland - also when zoned as industrial area or scheduled
>> for
>> residential construction.
>>
>
>
> interestingly not. I ne
sent from a phone
> On 13 Oct 2022, at 21:50, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> Field is landuse=farmland - also when zoned as industrial area or scheduled
> for
> residential construction.
interestingly not. I never found this particularly logical, but this situation
is landuse
Oct 13, 2022, 10:36 by dieterdre...@gmail.com:
> Am Mi., 12. Okt. 2022 um 16:25 Uhr schrieb Greg Troxel <> g...@lexort.com> >:
>
>> a several-acre parcel with
>> a house and some trees is still landuse=residential on all of it,
>>
>
>
> it depends, if this means a big residential garden or oth
sent from a phone
> On 13 Oct 2022, at 18:35, Davidoskky wrote:
>
> It is currently tagged as natural=spring, which it clearly is not since it is
> not a natural formation and it is way too low altitude to be a spring anyway.
ask the mapper who put it, maybe they have more information. If y
sent from a phone
> On 13 Oct 2022, at 18:25, Davidoskky via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> It is an old fountain, maybe 100/200 years old, but I don't see how that
> could be defined as historic since it has no historic importance, it's just
> an old fountain.
>
maybe I am using the word historic
why are you sure it is a fountain? And what has it to do with it having a tap?
if it isn’t a tap it will not help if it had one.
I'm not sure about anything anymore...
Maybe it is not a fountain, the problem is that I have no idea how that
could be tagged with the current tagging scheme.
On 12/10/22 10:32, Warin wrote:
I don't think the stream of water is the most useful feature .. it is
the water in the trough for animals to drink from .. horses, donkeys
.. etc.. I am assuming the lower structure contains some level of
water simply by its shape.
No, it does not contain any si
it is a historic fountain that IMHO clearly is decorative
In my opinion the fountain is neither historic nor decorative.
It is an old fountain, maybe 100/200 years old, but I don't see how that
could be defined as historic since it has no historic importance, it's
just an old fountain.
I do
On 12/10/22 10:36, Warin wrote:
Why not fountain:style=* and fountain:function=*? Could save some
misunderstandings and ease migration?
I was thinking about fountain:design since style is a generic attribute
that might be interpreted in many different ways.
What do you mean by fountain:fu
On 13/10/22 10:15, Warin wrote:
I see no point in depreciating anything at the moment .. 'we' need a
solution first before even thinking of depreciation.
I do agree and appreciate this approach. A solution for tagging
man_made=drinking_fountain already exists, that is fountain=bubbler.
I se
Minh Nguyen writes:
> Vào lúc 01:45 2022-10-13, Martin Koppenhoefer đã viết:
>> Often names refer to the whole part of the settlement, but there are
>> also named contiguos, single use developments where adding the name
>> to the landuse seems to "work" (not generally, only in some
>> instances)
Martin Koppenhoefer writes:
> Am Mi., 12. Okt. 2022 um 16:25 Uhr schrieb Greg Troxel :
>
>> Part of the issue is that landuse should more or less follow property
>> lines, unless there is some reason why not.
>
>> a several-acre parcel with
>> a house and some trees is still landuse=residentia
Nick Santos writes:
> I'd say if you think it's going to work, build it and show the community
> examples of where it works well and where it doesn't. Discussing the
> hypothetical makes us all revert to our own assumptions rather than looking
> at a real comparison. I'm personally skeptical tha
Vào lúc 01:45 2022-10-13, Martin Koppenhoefer đã viết:
Often names refer to the whole part of the settlement, but there are
also named contiguos, single use developments where adding the name to
the landuse seems to "work" (not generally, only in some instances).
The latter is especially preva
Am Do., 13. Okt. 2022 um 11:55 Uhr schrieb Martin Fischer :
> Sidenote: I am curious how many subscribers the mailing lists each have.
> I'd expect tagging@ to have more subscribers than talk@ but that's just
> a hunch.
I see the potential users less amongst those who already participate here,
Hi Martin,
this is great news, maybe offtopic on the tagging mailing list, I'd
have it expected on talk or dev, but sounds and looks very interesting.
Thanks :) I just also sent the same announcement to the talk list.
Sidenote: I am curious how many subscribers the mailing lists each have.
Am Do., 13. Okt. 2022 um 10:52 Uhr schrieb Martin Fischer :
> Hi everybody,
>
> I wrote two small MediaWiki extensions for wiki.openstreetmap.org: one
> to let you log in via your OSM account and one to provide an easy to use
> in-wiki GUI for proposal voting.
>
> I also set up a small demo wiki s
Am Mi., 12. Okt. 2022 um 20:00 Uhr schrieb Evan Carroll :
>
> This is all 100% new to me. Where is it documented that a "shop" in a
> detached house should be mapped as a detached house, and not a shop?
>
please do not try to create confusion bvy shortening things. There are 2
entities to be ma
Hi everybody,
I wrote two small MediaWiki extensions for wiki.openstreetmap.org: one
to let you log in via your OSM account and one to provide an easy to use
in-wiki GUI for proposal voting.
I also set up a small demo wiki so that you all can try both extensions out:
https://demo-wiki.push-f
Am Mi., 12. Okt. 2022 um 17:43 Uhr schrieb Evan Carroll :
> Some neighborhoods have signs with names, which is great
> because you can add value with the name.
use place=neighbourhood for these names if they are referring to something
bigger than a contiguos property. When you add names to lan
Am Mi., 12. Okt. 2022 um 16:25 Uhr schrieb Greg Troxel :
> Part of the issue is that landuse should more or less follow property
> lines, unless there is some reason why not.
I would generally agree with this
> a several-acre parcel with
> a house and some trees is still landuse=residentia
Am Mi., 12. Okt. 2022 um 17:46 Uhr schrieb Evan Carroll :
> Landuse has nothing to do with local authorities or zoning.
+1
However, as-is unnamed
> developed landuse is a function of the buildings inside.
>
not necessarily, it is about the whole land that has the tag, it could also
be land
On 11/10/22 05:39, Davidoskky via Tagging wrote:
I feel that writing on this mailing list is not such a good way to
find good solutions to problems, while it appears a wonderful place to
find problems.
Yes, a wonderful way to find problems. Few suggest ways to fix them... I
do try to
Am Mi., 12. Okt. 2022 um 16:19 Uhr schrieb Marc_marc :
> On 12/10/2022 09:34, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> >> we do not need the historic key to be “approved”,
>
> you don't need please do not speak for others,
it was a way if saying; "the history key cannot be more approved as it is
now"
Am Mi., 12. Okt. 2022 um 12:03 Uhr schrieb martianfreeloader <
martianfreeloa...@posteo.net>:
> So then what's the point of approving tags anyways?
there is not much sense in the act of "approving", the meaningful part has
happened before, the main benefit lies in the process, improving the
po
sent from a phone
> On 11 Oct 2022, at 11:39, Illia Marchenko wrote:
>
> Of course. Hierarchical tagging. leisure = pitch & sport = *.
or leisure=swimming_pool, track, golf_course, fitness_centre, sports_centre,
climbing, mtb routes, landuse=recreation_ground, piste=* etc
The situation
26 matches
Mail list logo
