"So it would be "jointed large rounded natural stones cut to a flat
top"? Smoothness similar to setts, but appearance similar to
cobblestones?
Also, [1] describes some pavements as "Cobbles chosen for flat upper
surface" which is possibly not the same as being cut, but possibly
what is meant by
Hi.
"I think this cobblestone:flattened can be a good value"
In my opinion no.
Because it does not create a regular shape in any way.
surface=cobblestone/cobblestone:flattened was roads created from local
rough stones(left by the glacier) stones are rounded by nature(smoothed by
glaciers) just
Hi.
I think that pawing stone will be ok.
surface=paving_stone
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permeable_paving#/media/File:
Santarem_carfree.JPG
Regars
Slavo
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
In many man_made=drinking_fountain there is a smoll button or a small piece
of metal that opens the stream of water. Tap opened with a button, small
piece of metal or even motion detector.
In other points consent man_made=drinking_fountain it is only for drinking,
small amounts of water.
"I
I understand that tag amenity=drinking_water is a problem because it
complicates basic tagging water sources.
I understand that the amenity=water_point is repair method has
appeared. Why not try to fix basic tagging.
Current tagging goes into atomization, fragmentation.
Maybe in 10 years we will
"I don't know if this is a language issue or some peculiarity of labelling
in your country"
I understand that you suggest a change amenity=drinking_water to
amenity=water_point I am very much in charge. In OSM, we map usage the
first tag in your country(not only yours) was amenity=drinking_water
Everyone is focused on amenity=drinking water. I have a question for the
source tag amenity=water_point, waterway=water_point (waterway=fuel maybe
also should be?) Is all confusion about amenity=drinking_water and
amenity=water_point related to the grammar of english language?
Regards
Slavo
"Note that "potable" doesn't mean drinking water, it means any liquid that
can be (reasonably) safely ingested, such as orange juice or beer."
That's right, but here we are talk about water, not all other
substances that contain it.
Small beer has not killed anyone yet(it is harmful after several
"man made=drinking_fountain must have information if human can use this
water intake for health and legal reasons."
Upss. I mean amenity=fountain not man made=drinking_fountain
Regards
Slavo
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
"Amenity= drinking_water is non specific. It does not tell me if I can
drink directly from it (I can from a man_made=drinking_fountain), fill a
water bottle without trouble (I can from a man_made=tag,
drinking_water=yes), fill a caravan water tank (I and from a
amenity=water_point) .. etc etc.
"The man_made=tap,drinking_fountain, well stand by themselves. They do
not need amenity=drinking_water, and suggesting that
amenity=drinking_water
should be included with them is wrong. Rendering of these man_made
tags is a separate issue and should not determine the tags used."
You've been
Otherwise. If the amenity=dringing_water tag is not suitable (the end user
can not see the code), it may be worth considering a global change to
amenity=water_point. If amenity=water_point is not suitable should be
deprecated. For me it does not matter if there is amenity=drinking_water or
It should be
Someone can explain the reason for imports amenity=water_point
https://postimg.org/image/48ok5saed/ for example an increase in the amount
of the tag amenity=drinking_water https://postimg.org/image/f3607hgl1/ you
can see big differences http://taghistory.raifer.tech/.
Regards
Slavo
Hi!
"amenity=drinking_water works for me" it's ok for me too
amenity=drinking_water it is a very good, universal, proven and needed tag.
I wondered if it was possible to determine the quality of the water more
accurately. It looks like with drinking_water=yes/no/boil/ ... is an
indispensable tag,
I noticed that tagging without drinking_water=no/yes can have one weakness
if the water is contaminated permanently with metal salts of heavy metals
and other chemical compounds poisonous. Maybe can solve this problem using
hazard=* e.g.?
natural=spring / amenity=drinking_water
"Do you think I should explicitly mark as "drinking_water=no" the streams,
springs and pits known to be poisonous? They use to have a sign telling it."
We are talking here about official public water collection points.
In rivers and streams, the quality of water often changes a lot(from
hour to
"Do you think I should explicitly mark as "drinking_water=no" the streams,
springs and pits known to be poisonous? They use to have a sign telling it."
drinking_water=no/yes there are misleading and should not be used in my
opinion.
you have tags like:
drinking_water:legal=yes
"Do you think I should explicitly mark as "drinking_water=no" the streams,
springs and pits known to be poisonous? They use to have a sign telling it."
drinking_water=no/yes there are misleading and should not be used in my
opinion.
you have tags like:
drinking_water:legal=yes
"AFAIK it should be used for small installations that offer drinking
water, like the one in
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/LScjKmwn0QPn5JQ-ROPgdw;
Should be. There no exist non-drinking water:)
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
"
I wonder why you think that amenity=drinking_water is used to map
non-drinking water.
"
Hi Marc!
Thank you for the right note. Shah and mat:) You're right here I made a big
mistake.
I was slightly misled by the definition on the wiki drink_water=yes/no in
fact it does not exist. There is no
Hy!
"On the hiking trails in my part of the world, the volunteers have
constructed a number of piped springs. A typical one looks like
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ke9tv/6936811420 "
Such a place as in the picture can be tagged fast as natural=spring(if it
occurs alone). After deep reflection
In my area where I usually maping, there are no public sources of drinking
water where the water is not suitable for drinking or I do not know that.
I Think for sure this tag is extremely important in countries, areas with
more difficult access to clean water. Maybe as I will be more often in such
Hi!
I just want to point out that the tag drink water=yes/no is regulated by
top-down rules. I have no doubts here. Certainly in all civilized countries.
Personally, I does not add information whether the water is drinking or
not it has to be assessed on the spot by the end user of the map. I
Hi!
"In French for example "potable" means "drinkable (without problems)""
Always in different languages will be different meaning hence the problem
with tagging.
"Which law is that? And in which language? "
How do you know that drinking water flows from your tap? The question is
for e.g WHO
Potable and drinking_water are not equal.
drinking_water=yes means I can drink water straight from the source (tap,
fountain, source) the water has been laboratory tested, so I know I can
drink it without boiling.
Potable=yes/no means that water in any case should be boiled before
consumption
Hallo.
There is no life without water. I think that amenity=drinking-water is the
most-valuable tag that we deal with. It was created and comes to the map in
a natural way which can be seen in http://taghistory.raifer.tech/
(drinking_water is the opposite of waste water).
Where can we get the
27 matches
Mail list logo
