Re: [Tagging] Inclined elevators

Hello, I want to give you an example of how I described this feature (inclined elevator) in my town.. First of all a master relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10433645 Then 2 relations: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10433643 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1043364

Re: [Tagging] COVID-19 vaccination centres

Hello, Il mer 18 nov 2020, 22:11 Niels Elgaard Larsen ha scritto: > Tom Pfeifer: > > > Related tags & pages: > > > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/COVID-19_-_How_to_Map > >related to the "staying open" mapping effort > > > > health_service:prevention:vaccination=yes|no (455x, 80% no, n

Re: [Tagging] Rail segment in a bike route

nnot be > combined with role transfer. > > Jo > > On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 11:24 AM Francesco Ansanelli > wrote: > >> Dear Polyglot, >> >> it sounds good to me. But what roles do you suggest for such superroute? >> Many thanks >> Francesco >>

Re: [Tagging] Rail segment in a bike route

kable). > > In JOSM PT_Assistant there will soon be a convenience button to extract > route relations from route or superroute relations, to make a conversion > from route to superroute+route relations easier to do. > > Polyglot > > On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 9:59 AM Fra

Re: [Tagging] Rail segment in a bike route

Hello, a new example that could benefit of this proposal: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10605853 Can someone please go ahead and make a proposal? Many thanks Best regards Francesco Il mer 24 giu 2020, 23:25 Peter Elderson ha scritto: > For the record, I think a transfer role is a ge

Re: [Tagging] Mobile phone accessories

t; to sell mobile phones, so your first > option of "shop=mobile_phone_accessories" is best, though > "shop=phone_accessories" is also a good option. > > – Joseph Eisenberg > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 11:30 AM Francesco Ansanelli > wrote: > > > > Dear

[Tagging] Mobile phone accessories

Dear List, I'd like to discuss the shop category in subject... In my town, there are already 3 shops that sell covers and accessories for mobile phones and not phones itself. I think the most clear tag is the first in taginfo: 7 *shop* mobile_*phone_a

Re: [Tagging] Rail segment in a bike route

it should > alway check the ways themselves for access, no matter what the route > relation says. > > Fr gr Peter Elderson > > > Op vr 19 jun. 2020 om 14:02 schreef Francesco Ansanelli < > franci...@gmail.com>: > >> Dear Volker and Peter, >> >> I

Re: [Tagging] Rail segment in a bike route

Dear Volker and Peter, I agree with you both... The question was born for a bike+train (funicular actually), but it can be implemented in a generic way to fix similar cases. Insead of interrupting the relation on the railway, we can put the other public transport one as a member with a "transfer"

Re: [Tagging] Rail segment in a bike route

Dear all, I discussed with local mappers about the need of a role "take_train" or "public_transport" to fix bicycle routes... Would anybody be so kind to make a proposal about this post? Many thanks Cheers Francesco Il giorno lun 16 dic 2019 alle ore 13:49 Francesc

Re: [Tagging] Proposal for COVID Vouchers

Hello, Il giorno mar 19 mag 2020 alle ore 16:57 Martin Koppenhoefer < dieterdre...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Am Di., 19. Mai 2020 um 14:55 Uhr schrieb Rossella Di Bari < > dbrosse...@gmail.com>: > >> Hi! I am Rossella, an italian neo-mapper, nice to meet you :) >> In Talk-It [1] we get into a deba

[Tagging] Veterinary pharmacy

Hello, I have a question about this tag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dveterinary_pharmacy It's not much adopted and in unknown status. Should we use it? Some pharmacies also sells veterinary medical supplies, how to choose what amenity? Is it possible to use a veterinary=*

Re: [Tagging] Recycling diapers

Il sab 15 feb 2020, 15:25 ael ha scritto: > On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 02:52:22PM +0100, Francesco Ansanelli wrote: > > Nobody else about this key? To be honest I have another example of > > "recycling:" (not recycling) that are the batteries... So it's another > &

Re: [Tagging] Recycling diapers

Nobody else about this key? To be honest I have another example of "recycling:" (not recycling) that are the batteries... So it's another point to the idea that recycling is a namespace and diapers could be added to the list. Thanks Francesco Il mer 5 feb 2020, 13:53 Francesc

Re: [Tagging] Recycling diapers

Il mer 5 feb 2020, 13:30 Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging < tagging@openstreetmap.org> ha scritto: > Are diapers actually recycled? > Well... I've read it's theoretically possible to do it. > It sounds like waste collection point accepting this specific type of > trash. > Sure. If you read recycl

[Tagging] Recycling diapers

Dear List Can be the tag: recycling:diapers=yes/no Be accepted as allowed value and documented on wiki? It's already on use according to taginfo. Many thanks Best regards Francesco ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.open

Re: [Tagging] Company or association that organize courses

Il lun 23 dic 2019, 10:05 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > On 23/12/19 18:24, Francesco Ansanelli wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I would like to find a good tag for the case in subject. > > In particular I'm referring to mandatory courses that workers m

[Tagging] Company or association that organize courses

Hello, I would like to find a good tag for the case in subject. In particular I'm referring to mandatory courses that workers must to take part (like security on workplace) after they start a new job. The goal of the company is to release a certification after the subscriber reaches the minimum am

Re: [Tagging] Roundtrip and closed loop in relations

Il dom 22 dic 2019, 11:59 Peter Elderson ha scritto: > For PT, roundtrip is not an attribute of the route, it's a type of ticket > or it's what you use the transport for. You can do a roundtrip on a > circular line, but also on non-circular lines or mostly non-circular with a > loop at the end, w

Re: [Tagging] Roundtrip and closed loop in relations

ual work. I cannot see any simple way > (leaving out AI) to determine whether any given route is a loop or > something else. > I feel this is the right approach... We can define how to fix existing routes as soon as we find an eligible approach > > On Sat, 21 Dec 2019, 11:27 Fra

Re: [Tagging] Roundtrip and closed loop in relations

And with existing tags how you describe it? Il sab 21 dic 2019, 10:28 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > On 21/12/19 19:49, Francesco Ansanelli wrote: > > Dear Volker, > > I saw that someone went ahead and changed the wiki again: > > Use roundtrip=yes to indic

Re: [Tagging] Roundtrip and closed loop in relations

the tag. > I think this is a strong case against any change. > > Taginfo points in the same direction > 12665 roundtrip=no > 21774 roundtrip=yes > 42 closed_loop=yes > no closed_loop=no > > Volker > > > > > > > On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 at 18:17, Frances

Re: [Tagging] Roundtrip and closed loop in relations

In my opinion the options are: - deprecate roundtrip in favour of 2 tags with a generally agreed naming convention (best at this point) - keep roundtrip and closed_loop with the wiki definition I did change (relations must be updated accordingly) I read many of you asked a revert, I just want to

Re: [Tagging] Roundtrip and closed loop in relations

Posts by > original author of the topic on the wiki talk page have explained the > meaning of the term in British English. > > 在 2019年12月20日週五 06:19，Francesco Ansanelli 寫道： > >> >> >> Il gio 19 dic 2019, 23:00 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> ha scritto: >&g

Re: [Tagging] Roundtrip and closed loop in relations

Il ven 20 dic 2019, 04:21 Graeme Fitzpatrick ha scritto: > > > > On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 at 10:37, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: > >> >> it’s in the “back again”, makes it likely you take the same way. >> > > Sorry, Martin, not at all. I do a weekly round trip of ~38 klm - roughly > 13 k down & 15 k

Re: [Tagging] Roundtrip and closed loop in relations

Il gio 19 dic 2019, 23:00 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > On 20/12/19 01:16, Francesco Ansanelli wrote: > > Dear List, > > > > I have updated the roundtrip page and created the closed loop proposal > > in order to address the misuse of the first tag: &

Re: [Tagging] Roundtrip and closed loop in relations

is, current tagging respect original author intention? Unlucky Roundtrip change meaning between American and British English afaict. I've discussed also with another mapper and we agreed to fix wiki in order to avoid further misunderstandings. > 在 2019年12月20日週五 01:21，Francesco Ansanelli 寫道：

Re: [Tagging] Roundtrip and closed loop in relations

ker > > On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 at 15:18, Francesco Ansanelli > wrote: > >> Dear List, >> >> I have updated the roundtrip page and created the closed loop proposal in >> order to address the misuse of the first tag: >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roundtri

[Tagging] Roundtrip and closed loop in relations

Dear List, I have updated the roundtrip page and created the closed loop proposal in order to address the misuse of the first tag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roundtrip https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:closed_loop=yes Please let me know what you think Many th

Re: [Tagging] Rail segment in a bike route

Il lun 16 dic 2019, 10:56 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > On 16/12/19 20:21, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > Am Mo., 16. Dez. 2019 um 10:02 Uhr schrieb Volker Schmidt < > vosc...@gmail.com>: > >> Can we come back to talking about a solution. >> Maybe an appropriate new role value could

Re: [Tagging] Rail segment in a bike route

Il dom 15 dic 2019, 16:03 Greg Troxel ha scritto: > Martin Koppenhoefer writes: > > > sent from a phone > > > >> On 14. Dec 2019, at 08:02, Francesco Ansanelli > wrote: > >> > >> Thanks everybody for the feedback. > >> I've adde

Re: [Tagging] Rail segment in a bike route

...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 14/12/19 06:38, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> >> >> >> sent from a phone >> >> On 13. Dec 2019, at 18:37, Francesco Ansanelli >> wrote: >> >> I added a bicycle route that implies the use of a funicula

[Tagging] Rail segment in a bike route

Dear List, I added a bicycle route that implies the use of a funicular (railway). I'm not sure how to "tell" in the relation that you have to take the train and not ride the railway. Can you give me some hint? Many thanks Best regards, Francesco ___ Tag

Re: [Tagging] emergency=no on hospitals is ambiguous

Il dom 3 nov 2019, 15:49 Martin Koppenhoefer ha scritto: > what about specific emergency departments, e.g. a gynecological hospital > which has an emergency department for gynecological emergencies only? > How about to mention it as healthcare speciality? healthcare:speciality

Re: [Tagging] emergency=no on hospitals is ambiguous

Il dom 3 nov 2019, 11:19 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > On 03/11/19 18:51, Francesco Ansanelli wrote: > > Hello list, > > I don't know is anybody wrote about this before, but I have noticed that > the emergency tag changes meaning on hospitals and the res

Re: [Tagging] emergency=no on hospitals is ambiguous

Il dom 3 nov 2019, 10:22 Martin Koppenhoefer ha scritto: > > > sent from a phone > > Il giorno 3 nov 2019, alle ore 09:13, Jo ha scritto: > > the confusion is that emergency may refer to rooms, but usually in > OpenStreetMap it refers to access for emergency vehicles. > > > > actually emergency

Re: [Tagging] emergency=no on hospitals is ambiguous

Hi Andrew, Then you have to put emergency=no according to the wiki... Let me know if your editor implement it right Francesco Il dom 3 nov 2019, 08:58 Andrew Errington ha scritto: > We have a local hospital. It is tiny and has no emergency room. > > Andrew > > On 03/11/

[Tagging] emergency=no on hospitals is ambiguous

Hello list, I don't know is anybody wrote about this before, but I have noticed that the emergency tag changes meaning on hospitals and the result is weird: emergency tag indicate whether an emergency vehicle has access to the way/point, but on hospitals his value is about emergency rooms. I canno

Re: [Tagging] "not:brand" to mark a shop that isn't part of a chain?

Hello Joseph, I have to say that I'm not a fan of the tag, IMHO negation is something that will make harder to do searches... If the burger king is not the food chain keep the brand empty and write a note or do a Wikipedia page about it, probably an historical activity deserve it. About the no na

Re: [Tagging] Tourist bus stop

cles for hire? >> >> I assume it excludes intercity buses or buses to national parks, if they >> run on a regular schedule and sell tickets to the general public? >> >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:coach >> >> - Joseph >> >> On Wed,

Re: [Tagging] Tourist bus stop

nd sell tickets to the general public? > In my town, the Flixbus buses stop at Central station, this is supposed to be a one-shot stop > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:coach > > - Joseph > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 3:09 AM Francesco Ansanelli > wrote: > &g

[Tagging] Tourist bus stop

Dear list, please find the proposal for the tag in subject: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:highway%3Dtourist_bus_stop the idea was born during a discussion on Talk-it and it is my fi