At 2009-12-22 02:07, Erik Johansson wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Alan Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
At 2009-12-21 11:01, Roy Wallace wrote:
... If you don't know where the other end of the
street is, you can't use an addr:interpolation way, so it seems to me
that you
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 10:01 PM, Alan Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
The current scheme with
drawing a way to interpolate is too much work and cumbersome, for me
anyways.
I agree it's cumbersome. The interval is not definite - only that it be at
least 2 because of the spec of
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Alan Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.netalan_mintz%2b...@earthlink.net
wrote:
At 2009-12-22 11:59, Roy Wallace wrote:
I think Karlsruhe is still the best approach - e.g. even if you have
4, 6, 12, 18, 50, an even interpolation way from 4 to 50 is the best
you
Alan Mintz wrote:
At 2009-12-22 11:59, Roy Wallace wrote:
I think Karlsruhe is still the best approach - e.g. even if you have
4, 6, 12, 18, 50, an even interpolation way from 4 to 50 is the best
you can do short of mapping each address individually.
Except for this pesky line in the wiki
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Alan Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
At 2009-12-22 11:59, Roy Wallace wrote:
I think Karlsruhe is still the best approach - e.g. even if you have
4, 6, 12, 18, 50, an even interpolation way from 4 to 50 is the best
you can do short of mapping each
Hi
I've slowly started using addr:housenumbers, I'm not really interested
in doing it according to the way the addr:* scheme work atm though..
Because of the amount of work to enter data in that scheme.
Here are the things that I believe is different from the addr:* scheme..
1. I use
Hi,
Erik Johansson wrote:
1. I use addr:housenumbers, just to get numbers on the map. Even
though I don't follow the spec.
Then why don't you use place=locality, name=45-29 if that's all you want.
Does anyone have any improvements to make this scheme better?
Yes, use the same scheme that
2009/12/21 Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com
Hi
I've slowly started using addr:housenumbers, I'm not really interested
in doing it according to the way the addr:* scheme work atm though..
Because of the amount of work to enter data in that scheme.
are you aware of JOSM-Presets and
On 21/12/2009 15:39, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
are you aware of JOSM-Presets and autocompletion? If you work in JOSM
and use the presets, the street, city and country-tags will be
autocompleted.
Furthermore if you use JOSM's addressing plugin, you don't have to type
the street name at all -
Erik Johansson wrote:
Does anyone have any improvements to make this scheme better?
Yes: Choose key names for your scheme that aren't already in use and are
clearly different from existing keys.
That is, they shouldn't start with addr: - that prefix is commonly
used for tagging addresses in a
2009/12/21 Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
wrote:
Then why don't you use place=locality, name=45-29 if that's all you
want.
Thanks, that's a good idea (if it works),
what do you mean by: if it works? All alternative ways
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/12/21 Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
wrote:
Then why don't you use place=locality, name=45-29 if that's all you
want.
Thanks,
2009/12/21 Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com
But it is retrieved in the only way I care about namely the rendered
map. It could be retrieved by geocoders as well, with small changes,
it was this change I wanted help with. Note, place=locality seems even
better after what you said, or do you
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:34 AM, Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone have any improvements to make this scheme better?
If you know where the other end of the street is, use an
addr:interpolation way, in accordance with the wiki. I think your case
was essentially why
At 2009-12-21 11:01, Roy Wallace wrote:
... If you don't know where the other end of the
street is, you can't use an addr:interpolation way, so it seems to me
that you are just tagging a sign.
Is there already a tagging scheme for this? If not, propose one - but
(as others have said) don't use
15 matches
Mail list logo
