Am 27.02.2015 um 22:44 schrieb Martin Vonwald:
> 2015-02-27 16:22 GMT+01:00 fly :
>
>> Did sleep one night and now think we should include bays and lanes
>> within the lanes:-Tagging
>>
>> lanes=3
>> lanes:forward=2
>> lanes:backward=1
>> access:lanes:forward=yes|yes|emergency
>> access:lanes:back
> On Feb 28, 2015, at 5:22 PM, Jo wrote:
>
> Like those, but to me it doesn't feel right to draw a separate service way
> for them. There is no division like between dual carriageways. It's merely
> the road that becomes a bit wider, so the buses can get out of the way of the
> other traffi
On 27.02.2015 18:38, Jo wrote:
> I can't help but keep hoping that a way to tag bus bays emerges as a
> side product of this discussion. At the moment I'm resorting to drawing
> the platform way, the cycleway or the landuse around them, but there are
> cases where the cycleway goes straight through
Like those, but to me it doesn't feel right to draw a separate service way
for them. There is no division like between dual carriageways. It's merely
the road that becomes a bit wider, so the buses can get out of the way of
the other traffic.
Drawing the platform as a separate way, or the cycleway
The bus bays and breakdown bays are short sections that exit from the
nearest highway and return back to it, not too complex to tag as
highway=service and service=bus_bay or breakdown_bay?
Some breakdown bays have emergency telephones too.
I've not bothered with platform way here .. too many
Tagging lanes/bays as separate ways seems wrong. It ends in complex
junctions where
every lane has its own highway=*.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=50.04570&mlon=19.92147#map=19/50.04570/19.92147
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/899988/6425360/dfbdf646-bf25-11e4-9aca-20b25eab450f.pn
Hi!
2015-02-27 16:22 GMT+01:00 fly :
> Did sleep one night and now think we should include bays and lanes
> within the lanes:-Tagging
>
> lanes=3
> lanes:forward=2
> lanes:backward=1
> access:lanes:forward=yes|yes|emergency
> access:lanes:backward=yes|emergency
>
To me it just does not feel righ
Bus bays like this?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/287489422
On 2015-02-27 18:38, Jo wrote:
> I can't help but keep hoping that a way to tag bus bays emerges as a side
> product of this discussion. At the moment I'm resorting to drawing the
> platform way, the cycleway or the landuse
I can't help but keep hoping that a way to tag bus bays emerges as a side
product of this discussion. At the moment I'm resorting to drawing the
platform way, the cycleway or the landuse around them, but there are cases
where the cycleway goes straight through them, as well and that's not
really ma
2015-02-27 17:33 GMT+01:00 Bryce Nesbitt :
> These bays are, in a sense, very restricted amenity=parking,
I agree on landuse=highway (because they are clearly part of the highway),
although that doesn't seem to be a very helpful way of tagging, I'd also
include them in area:highway but they are
These bays are, in a sense, very restricted amenity=parking,
or a non-lane landuse=highway.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
2015-02-27 16:22 GMT+01:00 fly :
> Did sleep one night and now think we should include bays and lanes
> within the lanes:-Tagging
>
IMHO not, these bays are no lanes, hence should not be tagged as lanes.
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging
Did sleep one night and now think we should include bays and lanes
within the lanes:-Tagging
lanes=3
lanes:forward=2
lanes:backward=1
access:lanes:forward=yes|yes|emergency
access:lanes:backward=yes|emergency
All together I am not happy with the description of lanes=* and
lanes:*=* anymore. Where
2015-02-25 19:56 GMT+01:00 Ole Nielsen :
> On 25/02/2015 16:41, Martin Vonwald wrote:
>
>> I don't think of them as lanes, so I wouldn't use some :lanes-tag. I
>> thought that there is already a tag, that I simply put on the road for
>> the length of the bay - just like e.g. sidewalk=right. But th
2015-02-25 16:52 GMT+01:00 fly :
> Well, emergency=bay might interfere with access tagging and we should
> probably use left/right as you will find them not only on dual carriage
> roads.
>
> emergency_bay=both/left/right ?
>
That seems reasonable to me.
> How do we tag emergency lanes ?
>
I
On 25/02/2015 16:41, Martin Vonwald wrote:
I don't think of them as lanes, so I wouldn't use some :lanes-tag. I
thought that there is already a tag, that I simply put on the road for
the length of the bay - just like e.g. sidewalk=right. But that's
obviously not the case and it is not possible wi
Am 25.02.2015 um 16:41 schrieb Martin Vonwald:
> 2015-02-25 16:34 GMT+01:00 fly :
>
>> So what do you have in mind ? Tagging them as additional tag on the way
>> with highway=*? Using lanes:-Tagging ?
>>
>
> I don't think of them as lanes, so I wouldn't use some :lanes-tag. I
> thought that there
2015-02-25 16:34 GMT+01:00 fly :
> So what do you have in mind ? Tagging them as additional tag on the way
> with highway=*? Using lanes:-Tagging ?
>
I don't think of them as lanes, so I wouldn't use some :lanes-tag. I
thought that there is already a tag, that I simply put on the road for the
len
Am 25.02.2015 um 16:19 schrieb Martin Vonwald:
> Hm...had a quick look how they are tagged and I'm not really convinced.
> They are tagged as area beside the road (without any connection) or as
> individual roads. In my opinion both does not fit well :-/
So what do you have in mind ? Tagging them
Here in Italy they are tagged in some areas and as nodes:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/7SA
On 25 February 2015 at 16:19, Martin Vonwald wrote:
> Hm...had a quick look how they are tagged and I'm not really convinced.
> They are tagged as area beside the road (without any connection) or as
> indiv
Hm...had a quick look how they are tagged and I'm not really convinced.
They are tagged as area beside the road (without any connection) or as
individual roads. In my opinion both does not fit well :-/
Thanks anyway,
Martin
2015-02-25 16:11 GMT+01:00 Volker Schmidt :
> http://wiki.openstreetmap
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/emergency_bay
On 25 February 2015 at 15:33, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> 2015-02-25 15:20 GMT+01:00 Martin Vonwald :
>
>> I obviously forgot how to tag breakdown bays (lay-bys, german:
>> Pannenbucht), something like this: http://binged.it/1
2015-02-25 15:20 GMT+01:00 Martin Vonwald :
> I obviously forgot how to tag breakdown bays (lay-bys, german:
> Pannenbucht), something like this: http://binged.it/1LCYpoM
> Couldn't find anything in the wiki or taginfo.
>
could be something for the emergency key? Or highway.
cheers,
Martin
Hi!
I obviously forgot how to tag breakdown bays (lay-bys, german:
Pannenbucht), something like this: http://binged.it/1LCYpoM
Couldn't find anything in the wiki or taginfo.
Any tips?
Best regards,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.
24 matches
Mail list logo
