On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:30:14 +0100, Dave F. wrote:
Why? What advantages does it bring?
It's not going forward just splitting stepping sideways.
What's wrong with have lot's of amenities?
Do you generally consider fire equipment in the same category as
restrooms and tourist information,
On 31 July 2010 21:30, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Why? What advantages does it bring?
Stephen did a pros and cons email on this topic, you would have been
better replying to that.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
I think there might be more types of public fire control
equipment... I remember often seeing fire beaters (broomstick with
flaps of rubber/leather) in a rack on moor and heathland prone to fires.
Maybe amenity=fire_beater can be added to the proposal?
Colin
On 28/07/2010 02:41, Richard
At 2010-07-27 23:25, Colin Smale wrote:
I think there might be more types of public fire control equipment...
I remember often seeing fire beaters (broomstick with flaps of
rubber/leather) in a rack on moor and heathland prone to fires. Maybe
amenity=fire_beater can be added to the proposal?
On 28 July 2010 17:50, Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
There are also fire hoses which are attached to building water supplies and
fan-folded inside largish glass-front metal cases inset into walls.
emergency=fire_hose maybe, though I'd like something that better indicates
that
At 2010-07-28 01:49, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Alan Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
There are also fire hoses which are attached to building water supplies and
fan-folded inside largish glass-front metal cases inset into walls.
emergency=fire_hose
Hi,
How about a fire extinguisher[1]?
Could it be included to fire_hydrant tag?
Seems the same purpose to me.
They are equipped by local government mainly along with residential
roads/living streets for emergency use in Japan.
[1]http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Fire_extinguisher_ja.jpg
On 27 July 2010 15:59, S.Higashi s_hig...@mua.biglobe.ne.jp wrote:
How about a fire extinguisher[1]?
I don't think this is a good idea, as they are 2 completely different things...
Could it be included to fire_hydrant tag?
Seems the same purpose to me.
They are equipped by local government
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 3:12 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
How about a fire extinguisher[1]?
I don't think this is a good idea, as they are 2 completely different
things...
t... but I'd tag them separately...
+1
--
Bill
n1...@arrl.net bill.n1...@gmail.com
are of use to
firefighters, but not the general public).
Using the same tag for both could cost lives, by making delays in finding the
necessary equipment (fire hydrant or fire extinguisher) to fight the fire in
question.
---Original Email---
Subject :Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC
On 27 July 2010 22:33, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
Using the same tag for both could cost lives, by making delays in finding the
necessary equipment (fire hydrant or fire extinguisher) to fight the fire in
question.
While it may be useful to tag these things on OSM, I don't
On 27/07/2010 13:51, John Smith wrote:
On 27 July 2010 22:33, John F. Eldredgej...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
Using the same tag for both could cost lives, by making delays in
finding the necessary equipment (fire hydrant or fire extinguisher)
to fight the fire in question.
While it may be useful
On 27 July 2010 13:51, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 July 2010 22:33, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
Using the same tag for both could cost lives, by making delays in finding
the necessary equipment (fire hydrant or fire extinguisher) to fight the
fire in
2010/7/27 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
On 27 July 2010 22:33, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
Using the same tag for both could cost lives, by making delays in finding
the necessary equipment (fire hydrant or fire extinguisher) to fight the
fire in question.
While it
On 27 July 2010 23:05, Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.com wrote:
Why not? As any other map, it has to be taken with piece of salt
Typical CYA legal stuff, that is unless you want to be personally
liable for mistakes you make which cost someone their life...
On 27 July 2010 22:58, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
Like an earthquake in Haiti, for example,...
I'd rather not be sued because someone thought they might be able to
do something with the data that turned out to be false...
___
Tagging
At 2010-07-27 06:18, John Smith wrote:
On 27 July 2010 22:58, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
Like an earthquake in Haiti, for example,...
I'd rather not be sued because someone thought they might be able to
do something with the data that turned out to be false...
Doesn't our
.
---Original Email---
Subject :Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Fire_Hydrant
From :mailto:alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net
Date :Tue Jul 27 12:29:25 America/Chicago 2010
At 2010-07-27 06:18, John Smith wrote:
On 27 July 2010 22:58, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
Like
At 2010-07-27 11:41, John F. Eldredge wrote:
Yes, but my point was that fire extinguishers are not interchangeable with
fire hydrants.
I did not quote, and was not arguing with, that.
I agree that hydrants and extinguishers should be tagged differently.
At 2010-07-27 06:18, John Smith
to map, as you would be likely to
find a fire extinguisher there.
---Original Email---
Subject :Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Fire_Hydrant
From :mailto:rwe...@averillpark.net
Date :Tue Jul 27 17:40:28 America/Chicago 2010
On 7/27/10 8:33 AM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
I agree
On 7/27/10 6:57 PM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
S. Higashi stated, earlier in the thread, that the Japanese government provided fire
extinguisher stations along some residential streets, and posted a link to a
photograph:http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Fire_extinguisher_ja.jpg.
Such a
Hi,
Here is a proposal for a new way to tag fire hydrants. It's more precise than
the old amenity=fire_hydrant tag and there is a very active discussion on the
German board: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=762 .
Common hydrants can be tagged in the old way, but new ones should be
On 7/26/10 4:20 AM, John Smith wrote:
On 26 July 2010 18:16,technikschlu...@web.de wrote:
Hi,
Here is a proposal for a new way to tag fire hydrants. It's more precise than the old
amenity=fire_hydrant tag and there is a very active discussion on the German
board:
- Original Message -
From: technikschlu...@web.de
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 9:16 AM
Subject: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Fire_Hydrant
Hi,
Here is a proposal for a new way to tag fire hydrants. It's more precise
than the old amenity
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:25 AM, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net wrote:
Why *should* newly entered hydrants use this new precise scheme. Voting
hasn't even started on the proposal, it might not get approved, the FRC
start date is today, so it might get changed.
I interpret that statement
25 matches
Mail list logo
