Re: [Tagging] Golf tag combinations

On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 02/08/18 23:00, Paul Allen wrote: > > I recently came across someone adding the address as the name, > unfortunately one of the buildings had a real name that I recalled .. and > it was not the address. > So while the

Re: [Tagging] Golf tag combinations

On 02/08/18 23:00, Paul Allen wrote: On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 1:48 PM, althio > wrote: For the Old Course at Saint Andrews (ancient and well-known golf course), holes do have names. See the Wikipedia page or the website.

Re: [Tagging] Golf tag combinations

On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 1:48 PM, althio wrote: > For the Old Course at Saint Andrews (ancient and well-known golf course), > holes do have names. > > See the Wikipedia page or the website. > https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Course_at_St_Andrews#Scorecard > > I think tags on OSM should be (it

Re: [Tagging] Golf tag combinations

For the Old Course at Saint Andrews (ancient and well-known golf course), holes do have names. See the Wikipedia page or the website. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Course_at_St_Andrews#Scorecard I think tags on OSM should be (it is not the case currently): ref=1 name=Burn ref=2 name=Dyke

Re: [Tagging] Golf tag combinations

On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 1:21 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry.. don't know what an 'allotment plot' is? I don't see that mentioned > in the OSMwikis for golf. > Allotment plots are nothing to do with golf. I brought them up as another example, like putting greens, where it has

Re: [Tagging] Golf tag combinations

Sorry.. don't know what an 'allotment plot' is? I don't see that mentioned in the OSMwikis for golf. I follow the rest of the 'ref' argument. Will have to look at it. On 02/08/18 22:09, Paul Allen wrote: On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Chris Hill > wrote: I

Re: [Tagging] Golf tag combinations

On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Chris Hill wrote: > I think people use the ref tag because that makes sense. > In some situations, where name=* is already used for one thing but a reference number is also needed, it makes sense. In other situations t doesn't make sense (to me) to use ref,

Re: [Tagging] Golf tag combinations

I think people use the ref tag because that makes sense. I'm not a golfer but on allotments the whole site usually has a name and the individual plots have a number (ref=*). The OSM Standard map can't show everything. We used to have a map like that as a sort of 'debug' map for mappers; it was

Re: [Tagging] Golf tag combinations

On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 11:03 PM, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > What's the green dot in the middle of the 13th fairway? > With some detective work, it turns out to be a tree. What puzzles me about golf putting greens and allotment plots is this: why did they choose to embed useful information

Re: [Tagging] Golf tag combinations

Looks good Andy. What's the green dot in the middle of the 13th fairway? Thanks Graeme On 1 August 2018 at 19:16, Andy Townsend wrote: > On 21/07/18 08:09, osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au wrote: > >> ... You can be sure that pretty much everyone that maps the detailed >> features of a golf

Re: [Tagging] Golf tag combinations

On 21/07/18 08:09, osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au wrote: ... You can be sure that pretty much everyone that maps the detailed features of a golf course does so because they want to see it on the map. As an aside, if anyone's looking for a style that does render golf features have a look at

Re: [Tagging] Golf tag combinations

> -Original Message- > From: Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> > Sent: Saturday, 21 July 2018 16:55 > To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools > > Subject: [Tagging] Golf tag combinations > > using it that way surely is 'tagging for the rende

[Tagging] Golf tag combinations

Yet more golf... sigh. Many of the golf tags (golf=green, tee, fairway) are combined with landuse=grass. And other golf tags (water_hazard as an example) use the key natural. To may way of thinking these should use the surface tag e.g. surface=grass, that clearly shows that the surface is