Re: [Tagging] Oil fields - how to tag?

2017-10-19 Thread Dave Swarthout
I heard back from the original mapper, Mark Newnham, about the use of the tag industrisl=well_site. He said it is clearly a mistake. Yes, this is clearly a mistake on my part, although I believe at the time the documentation on this was pretty thin. Feel free to fix to whichever is correct Mark

Re: [Tagging] Oil fields - how to tag?

2017-10-16 Thread Dave Swarthout
> landuse=industrial is simply > factually wrong because most of the land is not actually used for > industrial purposes. I also agree. But how best to tag such areas then? In terms of "mapping ownership", I don't think that bears on this conversation any more than it does when tagging an area

Re: [Tagging] Oil fields - how to tag?

2017-10-16 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Monday 16 October 2017, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > I think we don't map individual land ownership or land use rights > because of privacy concerns [...] No, we don't map land ownership because it is usually not verifiable which is partly due to privacy concerns from side of the cadastral

Re: [Tagging] Oil fields - how to tag?

2017-10-16 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2017-10-15 15:46 GMT+02:00 Christoph Hormann : > On Sunday 15 October 2017, Dave Swarthout wrote: > > I agree that tagging the entire lease area as landuse=industrial is > > not correct. Part of the reason for posting is that I'm looking for > > alternative ways to tag the large

Re: [Tagging] Oil fields - how to tag?

2017-10-15 Thread Dave Swarthout
There is no fence. In fact, the boundary as I've drawn it is a very, very rough approximation. The State of Alaska in an extreme case of stupidity won't provide the coordinates of such leases (or of its state parks or recreation areas either) to the general public. It's only there to define an

Re: [Tagging] Oil fields - how to tag?

2017-10-15 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Sunday 15 October 2017, Dave Swarthout wrote: > I agree that tagging the entire lease area as landuse=industrial is > not correct. Part of the reason for posting is that I'm looking for > alternative ways to tag the large lease areas. Is there a boundary > tag that someone can suggest? I am

Re: [Tagging] Oil fields - how to tag?

2017-10-15 Thread François Lacombe
2017-10-15 15:14 GMT+02:00 Dave Swarthout : > I agree that tagging the entire lease area as landuse=industrial is not > correct. Part of the reason for posting is that I'm looking for alternative > ways to tag the large lease areas. Is there a boundary tag that someone

Re: [Tagging] Oil fields - how to tag?

2017-10-15 Thread Dave Swarthout
I agree that tagging the entire lease area as landuse=industrial is not correct. Part of the reason for posting is that I'm looking for alternative ways to tag the large lease areas. Is there a boundary tag that someone can suggest? Also, someone suggested tagging the wellsite with

Re: [Tagging] Oil fields - how to tag?

2017-10-15 Thread François Lacombe
Hi Additionnaly, it's recommended to use dedicated tag instead of industrial=* (or as general man_made) Eg. power substation are mapped as power=substation and not industrial=substation oil=wellsite sounds great Think about using man_made=pipeline + substance=oil to link wellsites to processing

Re: [Tagging] Oil fields - how to tag?

2017-10-15 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Sunday 15 October 2017, Dave Swarthout wrote: > I'm trying to determine the ideal tagging scenario for the many oil > fields in the State of Alaska. The areas, which are large tracts of > land leased from the State of Alaska, are typically very large > (50-100 sq miles) and are mostly empty

Re: [Tagging] Oil fields - how to tag?

2017-10-15 Thread Dave Swarthout
>Martin wrote: I’d use man_made for the wellsite, as it’s a „feature“ Since I sent that post I was leaning that way also, except now I'm not sure the Alpine Central Facility is actually a wellsite after all. AFAIK, It is an aggregator for many small pipelines and I believe it pressurizes and

Re: [Tagging] Oil fields - how to tag?

2017-10-15 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 15. Oct 2017, at 04:39, Dave Swarthout wrote: > > So, inside this leased tract are oil well sites, (one of which is here: > 70.4189462, -150.9128577) and a larger pumping/aggregating site known as the > Alpine Central Facility (70.3445186,

[Tagging] Oil fields - how to tag?

2017-10-14 Thread Dave Swarthout
I'm trying to determine the ideal tagging scenario for the many oil fields in the State of Alaska. The areas, which are large tracts of land leased from the State of Alaska, are typically very large (50-100 sq miles) and are mostly empty except for a few installations containing wellsites or