I'm not suggesting tagging "gay friendly" which is too
subjective, and, due to PR, might be less informative now.
On 24/10/2018 23:10, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
When going on holidays & checking accommodation / travel guides for
options, you often see a number of hotels / motels which are listed
Thanks for pointing to it. It was also reminding of this earlier discussion on how to tag the "friendly" attitude of a place, but I couldn't find it back.
"Biker friendly" is difficult to grasp because it's a mindset more than a fact, and we don't map places for their mindset but for tangible and
I agree with Frederick here, lgbtq=yes looks like the access tags.
This discussion also reminds me the motorcycle-friendly thread not so long ago.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/motorcycle_friendly
Yves
Le 23 octobre 2018 20:27:04 GMT+02:00, Rory McCann a
écrit :
>Hi all,
On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 at 09:56, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> This is not my area of expertise.
Or mine! :-)
> So I believe this would be verifiable information. It would also be safe
> to tag women=no for bars or clubs even in countries where LGBT activity is
> illegal or persecuted. Men=designate
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 6:56 PM Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> This is not my area of expertise. But I’ve noticed that a number of bars
> that are designed for gay men in the USA have a sign on the door with a
> crossed out “W”. It looks like a no smoking sign but with a capital W
> instead of a cigar
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 4:12 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> I've seen & wondered about the "gay" classification on places before.
>
> When going on holidays & checking accommodation / travel guides for
> options, you often see a number of hotels / motels which are listed as "gay
> friendly". Does
This is not my area of expertise. But I’ve noticed that a number of bars
that are designed for gay men in the USA have a sign on the door with a
crossed out “W”. It looks like a no smoking sign but with a capital W
instead of a cigarette.
This means “no women allowed.” My wife tells me this is sti
I've seen & wondered about the "gay" classification on places before.
When going on holidays & checking accommodation / travel guides for
options, you often see a number of hotels / motels which are listed as "gay
friendly". Does this mean only gays stay there / a majority of guests are
straight b
On 23/10/2018 23:53, Andy Mabbett wrote
>> "shop=books lgbtq=yes" is a LGBTQ book shop
>
Wouldn't that be "shop=books books=lgbtq"?
Good point.
On 24/10/2018 00:55, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
there may be lgbtq things, but there are also places which are
explicitly gay bars, i.e. for homosexu
On 10/24/2018 4:27 AM, Christoph Hormann wrote:
*When* to add a lgbtq=yes tag can be hard to know. In some places a
gay bar can be easily identified by a prominent rainbow flag. Some
cultures are less accepting, so bars might not be so blatant (I've
seen this in the EU). Using the common OSM r
On Tuesday 23 October 2018, Rory McCann wrote:
> [...]
>
> *When* to add a lgbtq=yes tag can be hard to know. In some places a
> gay bar can be easily identified by a prominent rainbow flag. Some
> cultures are less accepting, so bars might not be so blatant (I've
> seen this in the EU). Using the
Hi,
On 23.10.2018 20:27, Rory McCann wrote:
> So to start off, I'm suggest a simple "lgbtq=yes" tag to
> mean "this thing is a LGBTQ thing".
Bit difficult perhaps since usually "blah=yes" means that blah is
available or blah is permitted, not that the place is mostly/exclusively
for blah.
(e.g.
sent from a phone
> On 23. Oct 2018, at 20:27, Rory McCann wrote:
>
> There is an existing "gay" tag[1], which is used 650 times[2]. But it's
> a little restrictive. And it also suggested "gay:transgender=yes" which
> is just plain wrong.
> So to start off, I'm suggest a simple "lgbtq=yes" ta
Hi all,
I'd like to improve the state of mapping/tagging for LGBTQ topics, and
I'd like feedback.
There is an existing "gay" tag[1], which is used 650 times[2]. But it's
a little restrictive. And it also suggested "gay:transgender=yes" which
is just plain wrong.
So to start off, I'm suggest a s
14 matches
Mail list logo