On 08.06.2015 08:52, johnw wrote:
A month or so ago, new entrance=types came up, and I thought I had a couple
new values for entrance. I’ve been thinking about them, and had these two
ideas.
Please comment on both.
1)
Access=student - access designated for students of a
I think we should focus on the shoes, and not on the students and
inter-buildings. Maybe there are some international suuchools in Japan
where you can walk in shoes, and have an entrance for students. How would
you tag that?
You need a tag like access:shoes=no for inter-building passages and/or
2015-06-11 14:36 GMT+02:00 Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com:
I think we should focus on the shoes, and not on the students and
inter-buildings. Maybe there are some international suuchools in Japan
where you can walk in shoes, and have an entrance for students. How would
you tag that?
You
A month or so ago, new entrance=types came up, and I thought I had a couple new
values for entrance. I’ve been thinking about them, and had these two ideas.
Please comment on both.
1)
Access=student - access designated for students of a school/facility, similar
to customers of a shop or
Hi,
I guess I need a solution for the path access too - because
access=private also seems an incorrect label - or would both be
covered by access=inder-building ?
just out of curiosity, what would happen if you *did* use it as an
entrance *before* using the main entrance?
-nik
Hi,
1)
Access=student - access designated for students of a school/facility,
similar to customers of a shop or visitors of a facility. Does not imply
age or gender, though it is used at mostly at K-12 facilities. For use
with entrance=* or possibly with certain school amenities (Locker
On Jun 8, 2015, at 5:50 PM, Dominik George n...@naturalnet.de wrote:
Hi,
1)
Access=student - access designated for students of a school/facility,
similar to customers of a shop or visitors of a facility. Does not imply
age or gender, though it is used at mostly at K-12 facilities. For
On Jun 8, 2015, at 8:05 PM, Dominik George n...@naturalnet.de wrote:
Hi,
I guess I need a solution for the path access too - because
access=private also seems an incorrect label - or would both be
covered by access=inder-building ?
just out of curiosity, what would happen if you *did*
Hi,
I hope that helps a bit.
yeah, thanks for the detailed explanation. I learnt a lot about an
exciting foreign culture today!
As for the tagging, there definitely should be something, and on first
glance, I do not see an issue with the access=inter_building idea.
-nik
signature.asc
