I have come across this issue too.
I realize that in some countries, they have signals and roads and full blown
intersections just for bikes, but many cycling roads in Japan:
A) dead-end onto footways, not roads, as the ways are often treated as footways
with a special designation for cycling
sent from a phone
> On 28. Jan 2019, at 10:59, Marc Gemis wrote:
>
> representing a way in OSM, and foot=yes on the way (can be implicit),
> but foot=no on the X representing the bicycle crossing, pedestrians
> cannot pass point 'X'.
> At least that is how I understand the current access rules
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 6:30 PM Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 27. Jan 2019, at 12:29, Marc Gemis wrote:
> >
> > But often, the cycleway crossing the road is not mapped. How would you
> > map a bicycle only crossing if the parallel cycleway is mapped as
> > cycleway
Actualy the "left side" highway continues to have cycle traffic throughout, so
the "triangle" will be:
* 1 side for motor vehicles
* 1 side for cycles
* 1 side for mixed traffic
Sergio
On 2019-01-27 23:59, Sergio Manzi wrote:
>
> If I understand it correctly, you have 2 higways (both with
If I understand it correctly, you have 2 higways (both with cycleway=lane) that
connect at a node further away, but cycles should cross at that point, before
the point where motor traffic merge into one way.
In that point I'd probably draw a cycleway (no motor traffic, no pedestrian)
between th
On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 at 21:30, Marc Gemis wrote:
> But often, the cycleway crossing the road is not mapped. How would you
> map a bicycle only crossing if the parallel cycleway is mapped as
> cycleway=lane on the highway=x ?
Such as this:
https://www.google.com/maps/@-28.5356863,153.5389423,3a,1
sent from a phone
> On 27. Jan 2019, at 12:29, Marc Gemis wrote:
>
> But often, the cycleway crossing the road is not mapped. How would you
> map a bicycle only crossing if the parallel cycleway is mapped as
> cycleway=lane on the highway=x ?
foot=no on the highway=crossing node
Also if the
Hi the problem is more in relation to crossing_ref. there is no description
at this level for cycleway crossings. Bicycle crossing is not zebra.
I prefer to use crossin_ref = bicycle
Because crossing is used with uncontrolled or traffic_signals
Jérôme
Le dim. 27 janv. 2019 à 12:30, Marc Gemis a
But often, the cycleway crossing the road is not mapped. How would you
map a bicycle only crossing if the parallel cycleway is mapped as
cycleway=lane on the highway=x ?
Then you need a point, and as you wrote access=bicycle or foot=no do
not work, as pedestrians and cars can follow the highway=x.
On 27/01/19 19:51, OSMDoudou wrote:
can only be used by cyclist
The “access” tag allows to express this.
If it is only used by cyclist ... what do the cars on the street do? Turn
around to find another route?
As stated before ...
The ways say what is on them. One way for the bicycles in t
> can only be used by cyclist
The “access” tag allows to express this.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Someone proposed highway=bicycle_crossing [1]. The rationale is to be
able to express crossings that can only be used by cyclist.
m.
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/bicycle_crossing
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstree
sent from a phone
> On 26. Jan 2019, at 15:17, Volker Schmidt wrote:
>
> The fact that the road is crossed by is crossed by a cycleway is already
> defined by the "highway" tags' values of the two crossing highways.
+1, I would go with highway=crossing and crossing=type of crossing, on the
Hi yopaseopor,
I think that
highway=crossing
crossing=uncontrolled
is also the excepted way of tagging for cycleways crossings.
You could add
bicycle=yes
to that (crossing) Node to mark that this is bicycle crossing (,too).
Hubert87
Am 26.01.2019 um 15:17 schrieb Volker Schmidt:
Hi!
I don't think cycleway=crossing is a good idea because crossing=* key
specifies whether a crossing has traffic signals, is only marked
(uncontrolled) or unmarked. However, bicycle crossing can also have
traffic lights or be only marked (and likely there are also unmarked
bicycle crossings). Wi
On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 at 12:05, yo paseopor wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Now I'm tagging with the more detail I can some cycleways in Catalonia. I
> do al the ways, and I cut and mark all the crossings. I do this with the
> formula
> highway=cycleway
> cycleway=crossing
> as a way (like I do other times with
>
Hi!
Now I'm tagging with the more detail I can some cycleways in Catalonia. I
do al the ways, and I cut and mark all the crossings. I do this with the
formula
highway=cycleway
cycleway=crossing
as a way (like I do other times with
highway=footway
footway=crossing
for mark all the pedestrian crossi
17 matches
Mail list logo
