On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 11:58 PM, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote:
I wonder why many people try to force the approval of a tag by fast
votes on the wiki. A tag gets approved by uses in the data and software
handling it.
I find it remarkable that after however many years of OSM's existence,
Normally you should start a proposal. I think you can immediately start with
the voting stadium since there is not much to discuss about these tags.
There are just an extension to the current schema and are perfectly
backwards compatible.
If you created the proposal. Do send a mail to this list
Am 05.06.2011 14:31, schrieb Sander Deryckere:
Normally you should start a proposal.
+1
I think you can immediately start
with the voting stadium since there is not much to discuss about these
tags.
-1
There are just an extension to the current schema and are
perfectly backwards
On 5 June 2011 23:58, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote:
As a proposal you can almost added it the same way on the wiki as a
approved tag and you can change anything that might not work or find a
better solution while testing.
I've done this in the past and set the status to defacto, rather
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 15:58 +0200, fly wrote:
I wonder why many people try to force the approval of a tag by fast
votes on the wiki. A tag gets approved by uses in the data and software
handling it.
Which raises another point, that if you really want to get your proposal
accepted more rapidly
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Seth Golub s...@sethoscope.net wrote:
Hello. I'm mapping the fire alarm boxes in my neighborhood, and I'm not
sure how to tag them. Here's an example:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dwthompson/36722209 77/
The closest thing I can find in use is
On 4 June 2011 17:02, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
I don't know of any, but I would go with emergency=phone, and specify
maybe in another tag phone=fire_alarm or some such thing.
The description of emergency=phone includes 'making calls to emergency
services' so it is not necessarily
On 4 June 2011 17:10, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 June 2011 17:02, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
I don't know of any, but I would go with emergency=phone, and specify
maybe in another tag phone=fire_alarm or some such thing.
The description of emergency=phone
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 9:10 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 June 2011 17:02, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
I don't know of any, but I would go with emergency=phone, and specify
maybe in another tag phone=fire_alarm or some such thing.
The description of
On 4 June 2011 17:44, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 9:10 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 June 2011 17:02, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
I don't know of any, but I would go with emergency=phone, and specify
maybe in another tag
Hi
I think this is best:
emergency=phone
vs
emergency=switch or emergency=alarm
this describes clearly the difference between one-way and two-way
communication. If you want to be more specific about the service that is
alarmed, you could use something like
phone=police
or
switch=fire or
Hello. I'm mapping the fire alarm boxes in my neighborhood, and I'm not
sure how to tag them. Here's an example:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dwthompson/36722209
77/http://www.flickr.com/photos/dwthompson/3672220977/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Fire_alarm_in_Ridgewood,_New_Jersey.jpgThe
12 matches
Mail list logo
