Re: [Tagging] mapping qanats

2013-09-28 Thread Janko Mihelić
2013/9/28 Michał Sałaban mic...@salaban.info I realized it is not easy to make a distinction between canal and aqueduct, but we may assume that the latter is usually for drinking water or irrigation of small areas of land. Everything dealing with navigation, flood protection or vast area

Re: [Tagging] mapping qanats

2013-09-27 Thread Janko Mihelić
Wow, I never heard of qanats. man_made=qanat and qanat=shaft sound ok, although I would rather use waterway=qanat. I see there are only 3 man_made=qanats mapped right now, so there is no problems with changing those. Janko 2013/9/27 Michał Sałaban mic...@salaban.info Hi, I've just created

Re: [Tagging] mapping qanats

2013-09-27 Thread John Sturdy
I'm not sure whether this should have its own tag; how different is it from either an underground pipeline or an underground canal? __John ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] mapping qanats

2013-09-27 Thread Michał Sałaban
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 1:00 PM, John Sturdy jcg.stu...@gmail.com wrote: Also, wouldn't we be able to use waterway=canal, tunnel=yes (or whatever tag we use for underground waterways)? Possibly combined with qanat=yes? Or perhaps waterway=canal, tunnel=yes, canal=qanat? This makes sense. It

Re: [Tagging] mapping qanats

2013-09-27 Thread Brad Neuhauser
man_made=pipeline, pipeline=qanat? This is similar to how the aqueduct page proposes to tag modern aqueducts, but qanats seem a distinct type of structure from aqueducts due to the vertical wells. (And I agree with John's point that it is not really like a pipeline, but I'd argue that OSM often

Re: [Tagging] mapping qanats

2013-09-27 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am 27/set/2013 um 12:18 schrieb Matthijs Melissen i...@matthijsmelissen.nl: Also, wouldn't we be able to use waterway=canal, tunnel=yes (or whatever tag we use for underground waterways)? Possibly combined with qanat=yes? I'd rather use something like canal_type=qanat instead of sth

Re: [Tagging] mapping qanats

2013-09-27 Thread Matthijs Melissen
On Sep 27, 2013 3:34 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: Am 27/set/2013 um 12:18 schrieb Matthijs Melissen i...@matthijsmelissen.nl: Also, wouldn't we be able to use waterway=canal, tunnel=yes (or whatever tag we use for underground waterways)? Possibly combined with

Re: [Tagging] mapping qanats

2013-09-27 Thread Janko Mihelić
On the canal wiki article http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canal it says An artificial open waterway used for transportation, waterpower, or irrigation. I guess we have to add drinking water to that list. When you look at the Wikipedia canal articlehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canal, there is

Re: [Tagging] mapping qanats

2013-09-27 Thread Michał Sałaban
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote: When you look at the Wikipedia canal article, there is nothing remotely similar to a qanat. It is not, but https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aqueduct_(water_supply) looks more similar and even lists qanat as a form of aqueduct.

Re: [Tagging] mapping qanats

2013-09-27 Thread Martin Koppenhöfer
Am 27.09.2013 um 21:33 schrieb Michał Sałaban mic...@salaban.info: However it might create confusion with already existing bridge=aqueduct. IMHO bridge=aqueduct is nonsense, we also don't use bridge=highway or railway, and aqueducts don't have to be bridges, they are also underground, or on

Re: [Tagging] mapping qanats

2013-09-27 Thread Michał Sałaban
OK, I gathered the three ideas here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Qanat#Tagging Any thoughts on it? Preferences? I realized it is not easy to make a distinction between canal and aqueduct, but we may assume that the latter is usually for drinking water or irrigation of

[Tagging] mapping qanats

2013-09-26 Thread Michał Sałaban
Hi, I've just created a proposal page about tagging qanats: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Qanat I hope you will help me to find a good way of mapping these features little known in western world :) Cheers, -- Michał ___