Re: [Tagging] min_age vs. minage

Am 22.07.2014 19:43, schrieb Florian Schäfer: > Am 22.07.2014 19:28, schrieb fly: >> Please, also think about the existing confusion and about the future. >> Mappers will always mix up the tags/definitions if tag names are that >> similar. > +1, different tags make sense. Ideally something, that i

Re: [Tagging] min_age vs. minage

Am 22.07.2014 19:28, schrieb fly: > Am 22.07.2014 18:58, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: >> 2014-07-22 18:31 GMT+02:00 Никита > >: >> >> Hello everyone! Target minage (age_group) should be different from >> legal minage (current tag min_age). >> >> >> >> generally agr

Re: [Tagging] min_age vs. minage

Am 22.07.2014 18:58, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > > 2014-07-22 18:31 GMT+02:00 Никита >: > > Hello everyone! Target minage (age_group) should be different from > legal minage (current tag min_age). > > > > generally agree (there might be exceptions etc., and

Re: [Tagging] min_age vs. minage

Am 22.07.2014 18:58, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > > 2014-07-22 18:31 GMT+02:00 Никита >: > > Hello everyone! Target minage (age_group) should be different from > legal minage (current tag min_age). > > > > generally agree (there might be exceptions etc., and it

Re: [Tagging] min_age vs. minage

I hear about ISCED for the first time but this is great standard (based on en:wiki description). It is questionable how easily this information (ISCED level) can be mapped. I question that every kindergarten headmistress (esp in countryside) may answer their ISCED level. Think about India or some

Re: [Tagging] min_age vs. minage

2014-07-22 18:31 GMT+02:00 Никита : > Hello everyone! Target minage (age_group) should be different from legal > minage (current tag min_age). generally agree (there might be exceptions etc., and it really is not a strictly legal restriction but more kind of a guideline in the cases I know of).

Re: [Tagging] min_age vs. minage

Hello everyone! Target minage (age_group) should be different from legal minage (current tag min_age). I have reason and explanation for this. I have found age_group (not legal age, but something like target_age) tag, but right now is only proposal and defined only for 4 amenity

Re: [Tagging] min_age vs. minage

OK, I've just merged both pages into Key:min_age [1] and Key:max_age [2], added a note, describing why and translated both pages into German. So for me the discussion is finished. If anyone doesn't like, that it's now min_age instead of minage: Please discuss it here or on the respective talk-page

Re: [Tagging] min_age vs. minage

> Am 19/lug/2014 um 21:12 schrieb John Packer : > > It seems using minage "for usage" is not very different from admission in > case of a playground. > In case of a school, it would be better to describe the school teaching level > using isced:level=* or some country-specific tag. +1, don't

Re: [Tagging] min_age vs. minage

My first impression is that minage should be used only for admission into the place. It seems using minage "for usage" is not very different from admission in case of a playground. In case of a school, it would be better to describe the school teaching level using isced:level=* or some country-spec

Re: [Tagging] min_age vs. minage

Both variants (compound spelling and underscore) exist. See min_height or building:min_level for example, which are used in (esp. 3D-)building-tagging. The highway-related tags minspeed, maxspeed and maxheight use the compound spelling indeed, but they are way more readable than minage in my opinio

Re: [Tagging] min_age vs. minage

Hi, I'm for minage. Compare with minspeed and maxspeed, for example. -- Cheers, Andrew ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] min_age vs. minage

Hello, I've just stumbled upon the two keys min_age=* and minage=*. Both have a WIki-page and seem to mean a similar thing: * min_age: "It is used when the visitors of an amenity need to have a minimum age in years. " * minage: "It tells you how old you have to be to enter a shop, venue, building