fly high wrote
but they are called falls (natural=waterfalls ?).
+1 falls is better
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/waterfall-tp5778845p5779185.html
Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Can we modify the proposal natural=waterfall because the writer stop the
work?
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/waterfall-tp5778845p5779186.html
Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Tagging
On 27.09.2013 16:20, bredy wrote:
Can we modify the proposal natural=waterfall because the writer stop the
work?
If we get to a conclusion that natural=waterfalls is the whole area with
maybe several falls + rapids it would be better to start a new one and
describe the differences.
Right now
2013/9/26 Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com
In addition, there is the more practical issue that often what is called a
waterfall is a series of cascades.
+1, while I'd consider your first point bike shedding, this second point is
indeed important for mapping waterfalls, hence the suggestion
In UK english, a series of waterfalls are called falls.
Phil (trigpoint)
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 26/09/2013 8:42 Volker Schmidt wrote:
No, my not was about basic physics, admittedly a bit pedantic:
As most waterfalls have a horizontal movement component in addition to the
component
Niagara Falls are tagged as area with tag waterway=waterfall + natural=cliff.
For me waterway=waterfall is better for node or segment of waterway. Or with
key waterfall=yes
And natural=waterfall is better for large river that use riverbank. Only for
way or area. Render as cliff but blue.
--
On 26.09.2013 14:24, bredy wrote:
As I have been traveling to two of the biggest falls on globe, I am
interested in this discussion.
Niagara Falls are tagged as area with tag waterway=waterfall + natural=cliff.
Well it is tagged as site. The American Fall is tagged as
waterway=waterfall as
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com wrote:
why do you want to have a decision. We have
8615 waterway=waterfall
2395 natural=waterfall
So they will coexist happily forever
Any (good) reason to keep two tags for the same thing ?
In the past, we had highway=gate
Man-made waterfalls ?
Pieren pier...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com
wrote:
why do you want to have a decision. We have
8615 waterway=waterfall
2395 natural=waterfall
So they will coexist happily forever
Any (good) reason to keep two
2013/9/25 Pieren pier...@gmail.com
8615 waterway=waterfall
2395 natural=waterfall
So they will coexist happily forever
Any (good) reason to keep two tags for the same thing ?
IMHO no good reason for a duplicate. But it isn't completely clear which
tag would be the better one. What are
2013/9/25 Pieren pier...@gmail.com
8615 waterway=waterfall
2395 natural=waterfall
So they will coexist happily forever
Any (good) reason to keep two tags for the same thing ?
My argument is simply numbers: I presume that it will require manual work
to convert either to the other,
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cascata_delle_Marmore
Phil (trigpoint)
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 25/09/2013 11:04 Yves wrote:
Man-made waterfalls ?
Pieren pier...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com wrote:
why do you want to have a
The Cascate delle Marmore is a clear case of waterway=waterfall, if you
want to be extra-precise, as it is man made. The waterway tag does not care
who made the way.
:-)
On 25 September 2013 12:45, Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cascata_delle_Marmore
Am 25/set/2013 um 13:12 schrieb Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com:
The Cascate delle Marmore is a clear case of waterway=waterfall, if you want
to be extra-precise, as it is man made. The waterway tag does not care who
made the way.
:-)
IMHO it doesn't matter if a feature tagged as
You overlooked an important symbol in my communication: :-)
I was not serious. We also have natural=water, which we use for all kind of
things, many of which are far from being natural.
On 25 September 2013 13:18, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.comwrote:
Am 25/set/2013 um 13:12
2013/9/25 Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com
You overlooked an important symbol in my communication: :-)
yes, sorry, I was not only replying to you, there were Yves and Phil that
had similar comments about non-natural waterfalls.
cheers,
Martin
Maybe waterway=waterfall could be a node on the way (or a a way, if
waterfalls are long), and natural=waterfall could be an area showing where
they are. A similar difference to waterway=river and waterway=riverbank.
Janko
2013/9/25 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
2013/9/25 Volker
2013/9/25 Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com
Maybe waterway=waterfall could be a node on the way (or a a way, if
waterfalls are long), and natural=waterfall could be an area showing where
they are.
maybe that's not a bad idea, waterway=waterfall could be a place where the
water is falling down
On 2013-09-24 20:07, bredy wrote :
Why there'are two method for tagging waterfall?
I see waterway=waterfall and natural=waterfall.
The first had a page osm very poor and the second is proposed feature, but
abbandoned.
Can we take a solution?
We have already discussed those inconsistencies
Hmmm.
Many, if not all waterfalls are *not* vertical in the strict sense of the
word.
On 25 September 2013 14:47, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.comwrote:
2013/9/25 Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com
Maybe waterway=waterfall could be a node on the way (or a a way, if
waterfalls are
Why there'are two method for tagging waterfall?
I see waterway=waterfall and natural=waterfall.
The first had a page osm very poor and the second is proposed feature, but
abbandoned.
Can we take a solution?
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/waterfall-tp5778845
why do you want to have a decision. We have
8615 waterway=waterfall
2395 natural=waterfall
So they will coexist happily forever
:-)
On 24 September 2013 20:07, bredy bredy...@yahoo.it wrote:
Why there'are two method for tagging waterfall?
I see waterway=waterfall and natural
22 matches
Mail list logo
