RE: [standard] doesn't accept a body

Users List Subject: RE: [standard] doesn't accept a body Oh, yes. Sorry -- by "CVS head," I mean the latest branch of CVS, which is the one that the nighly builds are drawn from. So the next nightly build implements the fix and should allow you to use appropriately. (In fa

RE: [standard] doesn't accept a body

ild? or I have to wait the next release?, or there is a > workaround.??? Thanks lot. Andrea Grittini > > -Original Message- > From: Shawn Bayern [] > Sent: martedì 2 aprile 2002 19.53 > To: Tag Libraries Users List > Subject: Re: [standard] doesn't accept a body &

RE: [standard] doesn't accept a body

bject: Re: [standard] doesn't accept a body Andrea, Thanks for this - this was just a bug. We actually never created a separate TLV for the SQL library, so it was pointing at the "core" library's validator and thus inheriting its semantics. I've fixed the problem in

Re: [standard] doesn't accept a body

Andrea, Thanks for this - this was just a bug. We actually never created a separate TLV for the SQL library, so it was pointing at the "core" library's validator and thus inheriting its semantics. I've fixed the problem in the current CVS head. Thanks again, -- Shawn Bayern Author, "JSP Stan

Re: [standard] doesn't accept a body

When I try to use a parameter inside the body of a sql:query tag I got the following exception : (after a 4 exception with message null and priviledge error) javax.servlet.ServletException: The taglib validtor in "urn:jsptld:/WEB-INF/tlds/sql.tld?page=/bodyXXX.jsp" failed to validate document w

Re: [standard] doesn't accept a body

On Sat, 12 Jan 2002, Ingmar Stein wrote: > your patch for the sql:param tag did not fix the problem as the > attribute value is still marked as "required". The DTD now allows a > body but still forces the use of the value attribute. Thanks for the heads-up. For consistency, I'm going to commit

Re: [standard] doesn't accept a body

Shawn, your patch for the sql:param tag did not fix the problem as the attribute value is still marked as "required". The DTD now allows a body but still forces the use of the value attribute. Cheers, Ingmar Stein -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional command

Re: [standard] doesn't accept a body

Thanks for the problem report, Paul. This was an error in the TLDs; the relevant tag handlers look okay. I've fixed the problem, and the change should show up in tonight's nightly build. Shawn On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Paul DuBois wrote: > The documentation for states that it can be used in > eith

[standard] doesn't accept a body

The documentation for states that it can be used in either of the following ways: or parameterValue However, using the second form results in an error message: "Body is supposed to be empty for sql:param". -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional comm