On 15/04/15 14:38, intrigeri wrote:
anonym wrote (15 Apr 2015 09:24:48 GMT) :
The branch is based on devel (although only the changelog (1.4 dummy
entry) differs from stable), but it is a bugfix so we'd miss out on it
in a potential Tails 1.3.3. Is this really intentional?
Yes. I didn't
anonym wrote (15 Apr 2015 09:24:48 GMT) :
The branch is based on devel (although only the changelog (1.4 dummy
entry) differs from stable), but it is a bugfix so we'd miss out on it
in a potential Tails 1.3.3. Is this really intentional?
Yes. I didn't want to risk regressions without letting
On 26/03/15 18:21, intrigeri wrote:
Hi,
please review'n'merge that branch's APT suite into the following APT
suites:
* devel (for 1.4)
The branch is based on devel (although only the changelog (1.4 dummy
entry) differs from stable), but it is a bugfix so we'd miss out on it
in a
Hi,
please review'n'merge that branch's APT suite into the following APT
suites:
* devel (for 1.4)
* builder-wheezy (so that our builder VMs get the same version of
syslinux)
Note that the APT merge might be non-trivial (i.e. tails-merge-suite
might not work), since
