On 31/03/2008, Jon Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have deployed Steve's changes and one example which has rendered
> already is the current alterations to M1 J8:
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.75704&lon=-0.41518&zoom=16&layers=B0FT
>
> In fact, even more of the new M1 J8 will ap
I have updated the Mottram area to reflect the 'proposed' tagging. Part of
the route is a proposed trunk road and part is a proposed primary road. I
have wrapped the new roads up as a relationship and include a wikipedia
link. I am also possibly testing the outer limits of rendering by including
a
On undefined, Cristiano Giovando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bhe, cose simili succedono anche in Italia, per cui mi han quasi
> sequestrato il GPS per averlo usato all'interno del centro di ricerca
> di Ispra (VA), circa 30km di strade. Sono anche stato invitato a
> rimuovere quello che avevo g
I have deployed Steve's changes and one example which has rendered
already is the current alterations to M1 J8:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.75704&lon=-0.41518&zoom=16&layers=B0FT
In the current Mapnik osm.xml file a road will render in the same dashed
style if it has highway={proposed,con
If you will excuse the pun - yes, that is what I am proposing.
STEVE
-Original Message-
From: Peter Miller on behalf of Peter Miller
Sent: Mon 3/31/2008 9:48 PM
To: Steve Chilton; 'Dave Stubbs'
Cc: 'Talk Openstreetmap'
Subject: RE: [OS
El Lunes, 31 de Marzo de 2008, Andy Allan escribió:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Peter Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Can I suggest that the vehicle oneway=yes/no attribute should be able to
> > take an additional value of 'reverse' to make all the tags independent
> > of the direct
Excellent. Thanks Steve.
So how should a proposed road be tagged? Should it be highway=proposed
Proposed=trunk Name=foo bypass?
Peter
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Chilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 31 March 2008 20:53
> To: Dave Stubbs; Peter Miller
> Cc: Talk Openstreetma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alex Mauer schrieb:
> Gervase Markham wrote:
>> What features shares a way with a railway at all, traction or no traction?
>
> highways, for one. There are railways which travel along streets in
> many places.
That would be another way on the same
In an attempt to avoid this kind of "false tagging for rendering" I have a
submitted an addition to the mapnik style tonight.
It will render highway=construction or highway=proposed from z12 upwards.
It will also render a text label (based on name=) for z13 upwards.
Jamie's more sophisticated sugg
The 'dirty hack' was recommended on this list so I am only following orders
;)
I am not personally qualified to go tinkering with Mapnik and osmarender and
don't intend to practice now but
I would be happy to put a small bounty forward for the work to be done. My
company would be happy to gi
furthermore the manila_poi2 file has encoding problems and can't be
read with my parser
2008/3/31, Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> hi Maming
>
> while implementing the gml converter i ran into problems with the poi_code
> file
> it lacks fields sometimes, could you check it ?
>
> best regards
> Ro
hi Maming
while implementing the gml converter i ran into problems with the poi_code file
it lacks fields sometimes, could you check it ?
best regards
Rob
2008/3/29, Iván Sánchez Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> El Sábado, 29 de Marzo de 2008, maning sambale escribió:
>
> > Are there any updates on
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Peter Miller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks for that Robert. A few other questions:
>
> 1) How does one tag something that is being considered seriously (such as
> the Mottram Tintwistle bypass), but which may well never get built? I think
> I will just
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Peter Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can I suggest that the vehicle oneway=yes/no attribute should be able to
> take an additional value of 'reverse' to make all the tags independent of
> the direction of the way and avoid the need to reverse ways at all.
I think Peter is spot on here.
David
On 31/03/2008 15:59, Peter Miller wrote:
> Can I suggest that the vehicle oneway=yes/no attribute should be able to
> take an additional value of 'reverse' to make all the tags independent of
> the direction of the way and avoid the need to reverse ways at all
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Peter Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can I suggest that the vehicle oneway=yes/no attribute should be able to
> take an additional value of 'reverse' to make all the tags independent of
> the direction of the way and avoid the need to reverse ways at all.
Can I suggest that the vehicle oneway=yes/no attribute should be able to
take an additional value of 'reverse' to make all the tags independent of
the direction of the way and avoid the need to reverse ways at all. I do
agree that attributes should use prefix values of forwards/backwards and
left/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Richard Bullock wrote:
| If it's genuinely under construction now, then if you tag as
|
| (or any other normal highway tag)
|
| Then it will render as a dashed line in Osmarender (but not currently on
| Mapnik)
| I don't see much point in adding dat
-- Forwarded message --
From: paul youlten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 7:05 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OSM & Political problems (Re: China cracks down
onillegal online map services to protect state security)
To: Tom Chance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
While "edit wars" m
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:41 PM, David Dean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Vidner vidner.net> writes:
>
> > Make the prefixes "left:", "right:" special in the sense that when a
> > way is reversed, they get swapped.
> > So left:highway=bus_stop would become right:highway=bus_stop.
> > (U
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 6:41 AM, David Dean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Vidner vidner.net> writes:
>
> > Make the prefixes "left:", "right:" special in the sense that when a
> > way is reversed, they get swapped.
> > So left:highway=bus_stop would become right:highway=bus_stop.
> > (Uh, m
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Cartinus wrote:
> Almost nobody would accept it if we suddenly had to use railway:name=,
> highway:name=, etc. on all ways just because there are some places where
> people want to tag the street and the the tramway on the same way object.
>
> What you'd need is a solution tha
Kyle Gordon wrote:
> I know this has already been answered, but it would be awesome if [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]
> could be accessed through the BOINC framework (especially as deployment
> to multiple computers would just involve an MSI and MST file).
>
> Anyone reckon if it's at all possible to get
Maybe we can have the data of all the different view
> points/angles and let the renderers (people) decide about the resulting
> rendering (map).
+ 1 for this. The OSM database can handle multiple views, we should
encourage different renderers.
Many people confuse the rendered data on seen whe
Iván Sánchez Ortega escomposlinux.org> writes:
> Don't worry about the schema - I think I reverse engineered it just right.
>
> But please get in contact with the maintainers of the mapserver, and ask them
> why on earth their WFS is returning malformed linestrings for the road layer.
> I'm
Martin Vidner vidner.net> writes:
> Make the prefixes "left:", "right:" special in the sense that when a
> way is reversed, they get swapped.
> So left:highway=bus_stop would become right:highway=bus_stop.
> (Uh, maybe this is awkward for the renderer implementation. Could be
> better to prefix t
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 13:14:00 +0100, "Bernt M. Johnsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I think this will be an increasing problem as OSM gains more momentum.
> For some people, national boundaries have huge political importance,
> and we should perhaps give some thought on how to deal with this
> bef
It's OK now.
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Tom Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> maning sambale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Are there any map available where timezone and server load is shown?
> > This way I can schedule my uploading ;)
>
> W
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
maning sambale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are there any map available where timezone and server load is shown?
> This way I can schedule my uploading ;)
Well there is, but this was nothing to do with load anyway.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
ht
Are there any map available where timezone and server load is shown?
This way I can schedule my uploading ;)
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Mark Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> maning sambale wrote:
> > I can download without any problems, but can't upload. If the server
> > is too busy
On Monday 31 Mar 2008 08:49, maning sambale wrote:
> I can download without any problems, but can't upload. If the server
> is too busy, I will try later when Europe is sleeping ;)
>
> maning
I'm getting the same problem too, again download is ok but not upload.
Nick
___
I can download without any problems, but can't upload. If the server
is too busy, I will try later when Europe is sleeping ;)
maning
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Karl Eichwalder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> maning sambale schrieb:
>
>
> > Any problems with the server? I'm getting 500 er
maning sambale schrieb:
> Any problems with the server? I'm getting 500 errors while uploading
> in JOSM for the past 30 minutes.
Just keep on trying ;)
--
Karl Eichwalder
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org
Bernt M. Johnsen wrote:
> On 27/03/2008, Edoardo Marascalchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-03/25/content_7858467.htm
>> [...]
>> The campaign would also target websites that made mistakes such as
>> labeling Taiwan a "country", wrongly drawing nation
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 8:50 PM, Ben Laenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 24 March 2008, Alex Mauer wrote:
> >
> > It also has the problem that ways can easily get reversed, and then
> > the left/right meanings are backwards.
>
> Then make editors change it automatically when reversing
35 matches
Mail list logo
