80n schrieb:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Nick Whitelegg
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> highway=track; bicycle=yes|permissive; [surface=gravel]
>>
>
>
> bicycle=yes and surface=gravel are an incompatible combination in my book
> ;)
IMO, bicycle=yes means cycling is allowed, or at least, it is no
At 09:35 PM 30/04/2008, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
>Hello everyone,
>
>Slight dilemma with what to do about wide, off road (countryside) tracks
>with official cycle access, in the light of the countryside mapping
>suggestions I made last week on the wiki. How do cyclists in general tag
>these?
>
>hig
richard, i see you've rolled out some changes as part of potlatch
0.8c, including huge thick ways...could you roll them back please?
they're very obtrusive and obscure a lot of the yahoo imagery
underneath. i'm finding it very difficult to accurately place ways on
the centre of roads, amongst other
Hi,
> > My cost for printing a Super A0 sheet is about EUR 1, and shipping to
> > anywhere in Europe [that includes the UK for those in doubt] is EUR
> > 4.50 (can take up to two sheets A0 or more if smaller; overseas is EUR
> > 8.00). I'll sponsor the money if you promise to use the posters for
>
El Miércoles, 30 de Abril de 2008, Robin Paulson escribió:
> a situation has come up, where i've been mapping some railway lines
> that go through a maintenance shed. the problem is, the railway is
> drawn on top of the shed, rather than shown dotted too imply it's
> underneath/inside. is there a t
Frederik Ramm wrote:
> My cost for printing a Super A0 sheet is about EUR 1, and shipping to
> anywhere in Europe [that includes the UK for those in doubt] is EUR
> 4.50 (can take up to two sheets A0 or more if smaller; overseas is EUR
> 8.00). I'll sponsor the money if you promise to use the poste
Nick Whitelegg wrote:
> One of the OSM projects I'm hoping to work on is a Mapnik GUI renderer for
> ..osm files (and live API data, cached locally, and PostGIS databases),
> based on the Mapnik viewer. However what would be good is to get some user
> interface suggestions from people. The aim i
Nick Whitelegg wrote:
> Slight dilemma with what to do about wide, off road (countryside)
> tracks
> with official cycle access, in the light of the countryside mapping
> suggestions I made last week on the wiki. How do cyclists in general
> tag
> these?
>
> highway=track; bicycle=yes|permissive
Tom Chance wrote:
> I can't see an obvious way to do this, maybe I just need to dig around in
> the code behind the export tab, but is it possible to already do something
> similar to the Google static maps feature, i.e. allow people to just
> specify a URL in an img tag and have the static image w
Due to the way osm.xml is built at the moment, mapnik will always render
buildings underneath other features. Osmarender uses the layer= tag to
determine what's on top.
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:26 PM, Robin Paulson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> a situation has come up, where i've been mapping so
a situation has come up, where i've been mapping some railway lines
that go through a maintenance shed. the problem is, the railway is
drawn on top of the shed, rather than shown dotted too imply it's
underneath/inside. is there a tag i could use, to show that it's
inside? something like the tunnel
If you use the coastline error checker, you would see that parts of the way
are reversed. With coastlines the Land should always be to the Left.
http://tile.openstreetmap.nl/coastlines.html?lat=-1.09287&lon=-46.13269&zoom=10&layers=B00T
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 10:47 PM, Ulf Mehlig <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Hello openstreetmap experts,
I tried to add a few details to a segment of the coastline of northern
Brazil, but as I see today on Mapnik this caused some disorder in the
coastline rendering (it looked almost ok in the slippy map/Osmarender,
though).
I would appreciate if one of the more experienc
Hi,
>While I have the PD-user template on my user page and would encourage
>like-minded folks to do the same, I feel it is mostly a political
>statement than of real practical benefit.
+1
Some time in the far future I will create a "clean" mirror of OSM that
contains only data neve
Hi,
> Can someone point me to some simple code/ideas on how to turn the xml osm
> data into way length? I'll then be able to report some findings. I'll also
> write up how I gathered the information needed so that other areas can be
> compared.
There's a script in SVN:
/applications/utils/filter
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Nick Whitelegg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Slight dilemma with what to do about wide, off road (countryside) tracks
> with official cycle access, in the light of the countryside mapping
> suggestions I made last week on the wiki. How do cyclist
Hello everyone,
Slight dilemma with what to do about wide, off road (countryside) tracks
with official cycle access, in the light of the countryside mapping
suggestions I made last week on the wiki. How do cyclists in general tag
these?
highway=track; bicycle=yes|permissive; [surface=gravel]
As a follow up. wiki page is at:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Completeness_Metrics
Cheers
Andy
>-Original Message-
>From: Andy Robinson (blackadder) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: 30 April 2008 4:41 PM
>To: 'talk@openstreetmap.org'
>Subject: UK metrics basis - How complete
Following on from Frederik's earlier snapshot statistics for Europe I
thought I'd work out a hopefully more reliable measure basis for the UK.
Hopefully it will help people evaluate their own areas to monitor progress.
The evaluation was done for the area of Sutton Coldfield and adjacent wards
run
Anyone with some money to burn going to this? I imagine just walking
around with an osm t-shirt would probably generate quite a bit of
interest...
Graham
+++GIS in the Public Sector: 14 May 2008, Central London
- Two Weeks To Go
- Countdown To EU's INSPIRE Directive
- Speakers from LGA, IDeA,
At 01:12 PM 30/04/2008, Rahkonen Jukka wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I concluded that I'd rather see my contributions in public domain and added
>> the PD-user template to show that. I wonder what does it mean in practice.
>> Is it now possible for me or anybody else to extract all features I have
>> creat
Some things I have read on the
internet say that in some jurisdictions it may not be possible to place
things in the public domain.
There are two big problems I've read about. (You might want to move
this to OSM-legal.)
First is that someone can include public domain material
in their own work an
I'm just calculating some statistics for my local urban area (Northeast
Birmingham). The area I've selected I know is 100% complete in terms of the
road network because all of it has been systematically mapped by yours
truly. I know the boundaries of the area and am about to pull the highway
ways f
Sorry about reposting but the original title
Meaning of "Users whose contributions are in the public domain"
was split somehow. I think just "Meaning of" is far too large a
problem.
-Jukka-
> Hi,
>
> I concluded that I'd rather see my contributions in public domain and
added
> the PD-user tem
Hi,
I concluded that I'd rather see my contributions in public domain and added
the PD-user template to show that. I wonder what does it mean in practice.
Is it now possible for me or anybody else to extract all features I have
created and which have never been touched by other users? How about
I meant loading it in a pgsql database.
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Skywave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it is better to load the data and then just query the total length
> of the highways. Like this http://slyserv.dyndns.org/osm/resultat.html
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:12 AM
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:11:08AM +0200, Ivvvn SSSnchez Ortega wrote:
>
> On Wed, April 30, 2008 10:32, Juan Lucas Dominguez Rubio wrote:
> > One funny alternative would be to compute not the size of the data
> > but the size of the tiles in a compressed format. An empty tile can be
> > compresse
I think it is better to load the data and then just query the total length
of the highways. Like this http://slyserv.dyndns.org/osm/resultat.html
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Steve Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>
> > Of course this is very simpli
Frederik Ramm remote.org> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
>a very crude statistic:
>
> Country osm.bz2 sizepopulationratio (bytes per capita)
>
> Finland 20M 5M4.0
> I suspect that
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Of course this is very simplistic and I believe you will come up with
> much better measures of progress. Let's hear your numbers ;-)
Interesting numbers. I suspect "objects per capita" would be more
meaningful than compressed bytes though (but more e
On Wed, April 30, 2008 10:32, Juan Lucas Dominguez Rubio wrote:
> One funny alternative would be to compute not the size of the data
> but the size of the tiles in a compressed format. An empty tile can be
> compressed to a few bytes, but a dense tile with a lot of ways and place-
> names cannot b
Hi,
One funny alternative would be to compute not the size of the data (nodes and
tags) but the size of the tiles in a compressed format (PNG or JPG or
compressed BMP). An empty tile can be compressed to a few bytes, but a dense
tile with a lot of ways and place-names cannot be compressed so m
32 matches
Mail list logo
