On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 08:40:57PM -, hy wrote:
> To make a long story short:
> How do I get all these into the map?
> Is there a forum to discuss things?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Beginners%27_Guide
has all the links you need. (e.g. to
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/A
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 08:03:55PM +0100, Andrew McCarthy wrote:
> And if I understand correctly, the final idea will be to have no "tile"
> layer at all, just captionless and transparent captions at all zoom
> levels?
captionless and transparent captions yes, but that doesn't mean that the
stan
Robin Paulson wrote:
> i'm mapping a stadium, that is multi-use - depending on the time of
> year, it gets used for cricket or rugby. is there any way to tag this
> once, and have the rendering change at the appropriate time of year,
> from one to the other?
There is one here that switches from Fo
Chris Hill wrote:
> Clinic can apply to other medical folks, such as chiropodists and
> physiotherapists too.
And physical rehabilitation, dementia care, psychiatric counseling...
the list might be quite a long one.
I'm coming round to the opinion that the different kinds of surgeries
are all
El Viernes, 6 de Junio de 2008, hy escribió:
[...]
> In 2003 I bought my first GPSr an started a bloody hack to visualize the
> tracks. Currently I have two major maps with about 100.000 WPs [...]
> How do I get all these into the map?
Well, it depends. What format are you using for the data?
> I
Hi everybody,
let me introduce first:
I am doing a similar work as openstreetmap does.
Actually I wanted to start something like this in 2003, when I didn't have
a job and lots of time - but no money to get it up and running.
Well, having just ISDN I didn't catch openstreetmap.org and did my own
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 07:07:54PM +0100, 80n wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:33 PM, Alan Millar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Right now the wiki instructions say not to upload the z9-z11 captionless
> > tiles; should that be changed?
> >
>
> Yes, if that's what it says.
Following on from that
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:33 PM, Alan Millar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> > No, there should be captionless tiles for zoom levels 8, 9, 10, 11 and
> 12.
> > Currently only 8 and 12 are used, but the others will be needed when
> > someone
> > gets around to produce language
> Alternatively, should we try to get the captions merged onto the "default"
> tiles for these zoom levels?
The wiki instructions for lowzoom processing say not to upload the
captionless tiles for layers 9, 10 and 11. So the captionless layers for
9-11 are a bigger mess than layer 12. Should the
Andrew Chadwick (email lists) wrote:
> What are peoples' thoughts on medical facilities that can't really be
> represented as either hospitals or pharmacies? For example small clinics
> for minor surgery, doctors (UK: General Practitioners' surgeries) and
> dentists? There are a few proposals out t
What are peoples' thoughts on medical facilities that can't really be
represented as either hospitals or pharmacies? For example small clinics
for minor surgery, doctors (UK: General Practitioners' surgeries) and
dentists? There are a few proposals out there already (still):
http://wiki.openstree
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 2:58 PM, spaetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 12:34:48PM +0100, 80n wrote:
> > But wait, as Deelkar says, tile 33 22 6 appears to be correct (apart from
> > the caption proximity settings appearing to be wrong). This was rendered
> by
> > you apparent
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 12:34:48PM +0100, 80n wrote:
> But wait, as Deelkar says, tile 33 22 6 appears to be correct (apart from
> the caption proximity settings appearing to be wrong). This was rendered by
> you apparently:
>
> *Single tile upload by user 214 (spaetz) with client 22 (Quickborn)
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:13 PM, spaetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 09:44:31AM +0100, 80n wrote:
> > It's intentional that captions are not being merged in a very low zooms
> at
> > the moment. There's some kind of projection bug that means that they are
> > not being pos
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 09:44:31AM +0100, 80n wrote:
> It's intentional that captions are not being merged in a very low zooms at
> the moment. There's some kind of projection bug that means that they are
> not being positioned correctly.
>
> Here the caption for London is about 50 miles too far
My last reply only went to talk-de, again:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2008 13:42:17 +0100
Richard Fairhurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks all for the offers of help! Really encouraging.
>
> I'll spend a bit of time bringing the text together and will create
> a wiki page for it. We can then maintain t
The highway=road proposal has now been approved. It received 27 votes, 17
of which were approvals. The relevant wiki pages have now been updated.
- Steve
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.nexusuk.org/
Servatis a periculum, servatis a maleficum - Whisper,
Steve Hill schrieb:
I don't think areas, such as landuse, natural, etc. should be considered
as something physically laid on top of the land - they merely describe the
use of the land within them and thus should not obscure other objects any
more than the land itself should.
If the land itse
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, spaetz wrote:
> Why should it work differently? If I want a tunnel under a forest, a
> layer=-1 *should* draw the tunnel under the forest.
It isn't in a tunnel though - if it was, it would have tunnel=yes.
layer=-1 is often used for waterways for a couple of reasons:
1. It
80n schrieb:
It's intentional that captions are not being merged in a very low zooms at
the moment. There's some kind of projection bug that means that they are
not being positioned correctly.
Here the caption for London is about 50 miles too far north:
http://www.informationfreeway.org/?lat=51
On Thursday 05 June 2008 10:31:27 Arnaud Bocquillon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just discovered this very fresh and interesting project.
> As i want to join the community and help mapping my region, I started
> to search for software that fit my gps config (Palm handheld+BT338).
> So i found out that th
we had the same projection problem on the dutch tile server with
openlayers and overlays, however kleptog managed to solve it..
i think he also has reported it into trac somewhere
2008/6/6 80n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It's intentional that captions are not being merged in a very low zooms at
> the m
It's intentional that captions are not being merged in a very low zooms at
the moment. There's some kind of projection bug that means that they are
not being positioned correctly.
Here the caption for London is about 50 miles too far north:
http://www.informationfreeway.org/?lat=51.93098706326705
i'm mapping a stadium, that is multi-use - depending on the time of
year, it gets used for cricket or rugby. is there any way to tag this
once, and have the rendering change at the appropriate time of year,
from one to the other?
will using the date_on and date_off tags work in this way, or are th
On Jun 6, 2008, at 09:09, spaetz wrote:
> But if you tag a river universally over quite a bit with layer=-1
> just for the fun of it, as was in the original example, then this
> looks weird. And osmarender is right to make it look weird, isn't it?
I think this can be correct, if say a river r
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 07:27:08AM +0200, Karl Eichwalder wrote:
> Keyboard navigation on informationfreeway is mostly broken once again.
Footnote, if someone *cough* *cough* is modifying IFW anyway, it would be cool
to have the caption layer turned on by default when browsing the osma layer
bet
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 08:14:02PM +0100, Jon Burgess wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 19:49 +0200, spaetz wrote:
> > Why should it work differently? If I want a tunnel under a forest, a
> > layer=-1 *should* draw the tunnel under the forest. Why do you think
> > it's doing something wrongly?
>
>
27 matches
Mail list logo
