Roman Neumüller wrote:
> In Russia they seemingly don't have no problems using GPS in planes... ;-)
>
I tend to use GPS all the time while I'm in a plane. How should I
geolocate my pictures taken out of the plane w/o
With my neighbours I speak open about the devices (WBT-201 and/or Garmin
etre
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Roy Wallace wrote:
>
> Ah. So I think the issue here is whether a lane can be:
>
> 1) explicitly traced out as a "way" (i.e. series of nodes), or
> 2) assumed to follow the same path as the "parent" way
>
> If a lane is related to its adjacent lanes and "parent" wa
> Preliminary results of the British Museum Test:
> http://povesham.wordpress.com/2007/11/23/the-british-museum-test-for-public-mapping-websites/
Thanks for all this - very interesting results. I'll work my way
through them and track down the reasons for the various errors. The
duplication is to
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Anthony wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Roy Wallace wrote:
>>
>> What do you mean by "it allows nodes to be attached to individual
>> lanes"? Do you mean you don't think a lane should be represented by a
>> series of nodes?
>
> Perhaps what I mean is more
A fellow mapper has kindly informed me that my changeset 2315455
appears to have deleted all the members from the National Byway cycle
route.
Unfortunately I am not sure how to revert this changeset; If anyone is
able to revert this for me I would be most grateful.
I think the problem may have be
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Roy Wallace wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Anthony wrote:
> > I have a great fear of the solution proposed by John, though,
> specifically
> > because it allows nodes (and even more specifically, nodes which
> represent
> > junctions with other ways) t
Please stop this person from doing any more damage. RR8 is still editing as
I write - can the account be suspended a.s.a.p., please?
--
Regards,
Cliff.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>Wow, such a crazyness...
>
>I tried to log a flight with my GPS-enabled cellphone (a Nokia N95), but it
>didn't worked after a minute.
>
>http://sportstracker.nokia.com/nts/workoutdetail/index.do?id=569496 (forgive
>the google maps background, as this GPX is useless for mapping I >didn't
>up
In Russia they seemingly don't have no problems using GPS in planes... ;-)
Ref:
(1) http://gpslib.net/tracks/index.php?q=&author=&type=avia&country=
(2) http://gpslib.net/ and choose 'avia'
Roman
> Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:40:41 -0300
> From: Arlindo Pereira
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] GPS gad
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Anthony wrote:
>
> Whether this
> grouping is done by a relation or a new table isn't something I'm going to
> comment on beyond the fact that it obviously could be done by a relation.
Yup.
> I have a great fear of the solution proposed by John, though, specifica
To add to this, this user is failing to reply to messages and
continuing to edit (currently in Iceland). I can't speak for the
usefulness of his edits there, but he certainly seems prolific.
Right now I'm torn between my desire to fix the core of the Irish road
network and my fear that he'll break
On 31/08/09 18:28, Jon Burgess wrote:
> It looks like something has changed again on gazetteer which has
> broken the munin stats which are hosted on the same machine:
> http://munin.openstreetmap.org/ is now redirecting to the namefinder
> as well.
That's a separate issue which I've just fixed.
It looks like something has changed again on gazetteer which has
broken the munin stats which are hosted on the same machine:
http://munin.openstreetmap.org/ is now redirecting to the namefinder
as well.
2009/8/31 David Earl :
> Something weird has gone wrong - I've not made any changes to it. I'm
On 31 Aug 2009, at 10:14, Jon Burgess wrote:
> 2009/8/31 Tom Chance :
>> There's a curious Mapnik problem in Peckham, London:
>>
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=51.47008&mlon=-0.06592&zoom=16&layers=B000FTF
>>
>> That industrial park has been split into two halves at that
>> particular zo
Wow, such a crazyness...
I tried to log a flight with my GPS-enabled cellphone (a Nokia N95), but it
didn't worked after a minute.
http://sportstracker.nokia.com/nts/workoutdetail/index.do?id=569496 (forgive
the google maps background, as this GPX is useless for mapping I didn't
uploaded it to OS
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:14 AM, John Smith wrote:
> 2009/8/31 Roy Wallace : > [should join] multiple
> lanes." From the wiki: "relations are basically
> > groups of objects in which each object may take on a specific role."
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Relations_are_not_Categ
It's doing an immediate meta-refresh to itself for some reason.
http://gazetteer.openstreetmap.org/namefinder";>
Phillip
PHILLIP BARNETT
SERVER MANAGER
200 GRAY'S INN ROAD
LONDON
WC1X 8XZ
UNITED KINGDOM
T +44 (0)20 7430 4474
F
E phillip.barn...@itn.co.uk
http://WWW.ITN.CO.UK
P Please consid
2009/8/31 Tom Chance :
> There's a curious Mapnik problem in Peckham, London:
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=51.47008&mlon=-0.06592&zoom=16&layers=B000FTF
>
> That industrial park has been split into two halves at that particular zoom
> level - each with a different shade of purple - for mo
Something weird has gone wrong - I've not made any changes to it. I'm
looking at the problem.
David
On 31/08/2009 09:34, Lambertus wrote:
> My routing website also has a broken namefinder connection:
>
>
>
> 404 Not Found
>
> Not Found
> The requested URL /namefinder/search.xml was not found
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 09:35:55PM +0200, André Riedel wrote:
> Da Dirk Stöcker in Kontakt mit dem LVA ist, wäre er dafür prädestiniert.
>
> > > Beispiel Chemnitz:
> > > http://www.statistik.sachsen.de/regioreg/RRServlet?function=Lesen&id=21234&type=10001&out=pdf
> > >
> > > Regionalregister Sachs
My routing website also has a broken namefinder connection:
404 Not Found
Not Found
The requested URL /namefinder/search.xml was not found on this
server.
Apache/2.0.55 (Ubuntu) PHP/5.1.2 Server at
gazetteer.openstreetmap.org Port 80
What's going on?
Marco Lechner - FOSSGIS e.V. wrote:
>
what's wrong with: http://gazetteer.openstreetmap.org/namefinder ??
I only get a continous reload.
Marco
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Matthias Versen wrote:
> BTW: Why are there 2 different border lines ?
Because some parts of the border (notably maritime and along shifting
rivers) are disputed and we try to represent this fact in OSM instead
of using OSM as a battlegrund to find or define the on
Support addition of motor_vehicle to presets for highway=track ... This
would usefully match a 'restricted byway' in England - as opposed to a
'byway open to all traffic' (BOAT).
Mike Harris
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig Wallace [mailto:craig...@fastmail.fm]
> Sent: 30 August 2009
There's a curious Mapnik problem in Peckham, London:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=51.47008&mlon=-0.06592&zoom=16&layers=B000FTF
That industrial park has been split into two halves at that particular zoom
level - each with a different shade of purple - for months. Zoom in and it's
the newe
25 matches
Mail list logo
