2009/10/23 John Smith
> 2009/10/23 mle :
> > Hi Folks -
> >
> > on a recent survey, I mapped some roads with modern km markers by the
> > side of the road. How should these be mapped - As a node within the
> > highway, or a separate single node to the side of the highway. And how
> > to tag the
2009/10/23 mle :
> Hi Folks -
>
> on a recent survey, I mapped some roads with modern km markers by the
> side of the road. How should these be mapped - As a node within the
> highway, or a separate single node to the side of the highway. And how
> to tag these ?
Wouldn't it be better to make a
Hi Daniel,
cc:talk-ca discussion list.
& Steve Coast, founder OpenStreetMap Foundation & the main discussion
list talk@openstreetmap.org
On behalf of the OpenStreetMap community in Canada, and as the main
coordinator who is working with this data. We want to express our
sincere gratidude & appreci
Hi Folks -
on a recent survey, I mapped some roads with modern km markers by the
side of the road. How should these be mapped - As a node within the
highway, or a separate single node to the side of the highway. And how
to tag these ?
___
talk mail
I have some additional info from the person who has been adding those
streets but is not on this list.
The relevant road in still there http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/39225908
however the person has been trying to use the NAPTAN bus stop import
to name some streets remotely, however
Shaun,
Bev did say , 'was there; now isn't' and 'have gone' which would imply to me
that it has been removed, rather than, 'remains to be surveyed'
See the title of the OP
Regards
PHILLIP BARNETT
SERVER MANAGER
200 GRAY'S INN ROAD
LONDON
WC1X 8XZ
UNITED KINGDOM
T +44 (0)20 7430 4474
F
E phil
Andy Allan wrote:
> There's no "where possible" regarding the license
What this section of the Legal FAQ actually says (which I think is an
admirable model of clarity, but then I did write it :p ) is that hyperlinks
should be provided where hyperlinks are possible. They are not possible in
printe
On Thursday 22 October 2009, Bev M Ewen-Smith wrote:
> Concordia Avenue, Wirral (CH49 6JD) was there; now isn't. LatLon
> 53.3877,-3.0919
> Neighbouring streets all still present.
I'm trying to find the culprit using
http://www.openstreetmap.org/history?bbox=-3.09983%2C53.3851%2C-3.08397%2C53.
Hi Bev,
Rather I didn't read below the "Regards Bev" anticipating that it
would have just been some form of signature or disclaimer. My apologies.
On the first example, it looks like the area hasn't been fully
surveyed, and needs some surveying.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=54.17683&l
Andy,
Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
> You mean the examples Bev gave aren't good enough?
Shaun's parser terminated after the greeting ;-)
Bye
Frederik
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Shaun,
You mean the examples Bev gave aren't good enough?
Cheers
Andy
>-Original Message-
>From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-
>boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Shaun McDonald
>Sent: 22 October 2009 2:13 PM
>To: Bev M Ewen-Smith
>Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
>Subject
Hi,
Do you have some examples?
Shaun
On 22 Oct 2009, at 14:00, Bev M Ewen-Smith wrote:
Hi,
I am getting reports from users looking at OSM in different towns in
UK, of randomly disappearing streets.
Is there some mischief afoot?
Regards
Bev
Examples:
Sands Road, Gap Road and Gap Crescent i
Hi,
I am getting reports from users looking at OSM in different towns in
UK, of randomly disappearing streets.
Is there some mischief afoot?
Regards
Bev
Examples:
Sands Road, Gap Road and Gap Crescent in the area of Hunmanby Gap (YO14
9QP) have gone. Lat/Long is N54 10.3700, W000 16.0900.
Con
> There are solutions, but all the ones I know about are commercial. I
> use a board based on MPNews from MessagePixels - I access it via NNTP,
> others use it as an email list or a web based board. There is a bit of
> culture clash - people who use the threaded (web based, nntp) forms
> tend to s
14 matches
Mail list logo
