They could be put as fee=prepaid/metered/unmetered
Perhaps not optimal, but not entierly wrong.
Konrad
2009/11/27 Kenneth Gonsalves :
> On Friday 27 Nov 2009 12:43:17 pm you wrote:
>> I would suggest
>>
>> amenity=taxi
>> taxi=autorick
>>
>> for consistency with highway=service, service=* and ot
Hi,
Frederik Ramm wrote:
> The iPhone is a lifestyle device, not a measuring device.
Before anyone misreads this - I don't claim that Android phones weren't
lifestyle devices, it's just more difficult to say something about them
in general because there's no such thing as "the Android phone".
Hi,
Matthias Versen wrote:
> add the point that it's seems to have one of the worst GPS precision of
> all modern phones.
The iPhone is a lifestyle device, not a measuring device. It has a GPS
receiver in order to display location based opportunities to spend
money; and for that I guess it's g
Valent Turkovic wrote:
> Android negative points:
> - less apps than iPhone, both for OSM and general
> - not so good as multimedia player (video and audio podcasts)
> - a bit bigger and heavier than iPhone
The last point depends on the phone because Android is a platform not a
single Phone.
>
Why do you insist on limiting everything to just areas, the problem is
micro mapping, areas is one solution to it, but not the only solution.
If you want to have a discussion that's fine but you are merely
dismissing other view points because the problem has been too narrowly
defined to even bothe
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 7:32 AM, John Smith wrote:
>
>> Is a lane a directed area? If it isn't an area, then it's not really
>> relevant to this thread, is it?
>
> That depends if you are you only after opinions that agree with yours,
> or if you really want a solution to a problem.
Which "proble
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Roy Wallace wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 6:51 AM, Anthony wrote:
Right now, what's stopping them?
>>>
>>> Documentation. Or, in other words, at least some suggestions as to how
>>> to do it. For example, you'll notice that Map Features states that
>>
2009/11/28 Roy Wallace :
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:47 AM, John Smith wrote:
>>
>> I've been seeing this thread develop, and apart from trying to use
>> areas and relations in all sorts of weird and wonderful ways wouldn't
>> it be simpler from a logical point of view to treat ways as a grouping
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 6:51 AM, Anthony wrote:
>>>
>>> Right now, what's stopping them?
>>
>> Documentation. Or, in other words, at least some suggestions as to how
>> to do it. For example, you'll notice that Map Features states that
>> highway's are ways, not areas.
>>
> Weird. http://wiki.ope
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Roy Wallace wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 6:47 AM, Anthony wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Roy Wallace wrote:
>>> But for people who want to do it [map areas], they should be able to.
>>> That's what
>>> this thread is about - giving them a way to
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 6:47 AM, Anthony wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Roy Wallace wrote:
>> But for people who want to do it [map areas], they should be able to. That's
>> what
>> this thread is about - giving them a way to map the world more
>> accurately, if that's what they're in
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Roy Wallace wrote:
> But for people who want to do it [map areas], they should be able to. That's
> what
> this thread is about - giving them a way to map the world more
> accurately, if that's what they're into.
Right now, what's stopping them?
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
>
> My point here is that the WAY information provides all of the direction
> details.
[snip]
> The area detail is simple defined areas 'grouped' with the way or ways that
> make up the
> route.
So in that case, you seem to be suggesting tha
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 2:47 PM, John Smith wrote:
> Using areas seems like a lot of work for no benefit if you just need a
> simple 2 lane road that has no foot paths or other interesting
> features.
Yeah, that would be a bad place to use an area :). Areas would be
beneficial for, well, just ab
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:47 AM, John Smith wrote:
>
> I've been seeing this thread develop, and apart from trying to use
> areas and relations in all sorts of weird and wonderful ways wouldn't
> it be simpler from a logical point of view to treat ways as a grouping
> of lanes and those lanes can
I've been seeing this thread develop, and apart from trying to use
areas and relations in all sorts of weird and wonderful ways wouldn't
it be simpler from a logical point of view to treat ways as a grouping
of lanes and those lanes can be assigned tags that differ from the
ways, such as directions
On 25/11/09 21:59, Roy Wallace wrote:
> This raises another interesting question, that is, whether highways=*
> should *necessarily* express logical "paths of travel", or whether
> they are just a convenient way to represent an *area* used as a path
> of travel, as a placeholder for future, more de
There is now a talk-ve Venezuela-specific topics and discussion mailing list
available. Thank you to Rafael for initiating and hosting this forum.
For details on how to subscribe to this and other country, language, and
topic-specific OSM mailing lists, see
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 14:12, Lester Caine wrote:
> Richard Weait wrote:
>> Looks like somebody is doing some area- / micro- mapping.
>> http://bestofosm.org/?type=mapnik&lon=11.42994&lat=51.30053&zoom=18
>
> Nice, but still not 'micro-mapping ;)
>
> Which sides of those roads have pedestrian foo
Richard Weait wrote:
> Looks like somebody is doing some area- / micro- mapping.
> http://bestofosm.org/?type=mapnik&lon=11.42994&lat=51.30053&zoom=18
Nice, but still not 'micro-mapping ;)
Which sides of those roads have pedestrian footpaths. Is there a footpath on
the
side of the road over the
Looks like somebody is doing some area- / micro- mapping.
http://bestofosm.org/?type=mapnik&lon=11.42994&lat=51.30053&zoom=18
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Roy Wallace wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
>> The bottom line is that while adding 'width' tags all the way along a road
>> may
>> be a practical half way house, other area features are not handled the same
>> way
>> so why should roads be any different.
>
> I thi
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
>
> The bottom line is that while adding 'width' tags all the way along a road may
> be a practical half way house, other area features are not handled the same
> way
> so why should roads be any different.
I think, because roads (ways) often
Hi
Using this link given here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Merchandise#Amazon
generates commission for OSM using the tag:
tag=openstreetmap
However if I do a search within Amazon this tag disappears.
Does anyone know if the money still, somehow, reaches OSM?
Cheers
Dave F.
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Peter Körner wrote:
> Some more things that came in to my mind:
>
> 1. When Moving a POI it's not visible, because your finger is over it.
> When you started moving, there's no way back and no possibility to
> cancel. It would be better if moving were implemented
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Claudius wrote:
> Am 26.11.2009 10:56, Nick Black:
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> Mapzen POI Collector was released into the App Store this morning.
>> Mapzen POI Collector is a free iPhone app that makes it really easy to
>> collect POIs for OpenStreetMap. Users locate themse
2009/11/26 Tomáš Tichý :
> This is great news. Are there any plan for Android version?
Android is definitely a possibility for 2010. We want to reach as
many existing and potentially new OpenStreetMappers as possible with
the Mapzen mobile tools, so platform choices will be based on that.
>
> T
27 matches
Mail list logo
