Hello,
I could not find a wiki page nor relevant data on how
to tag a touristic relevant road.
There is the scenic=yes tag, but maybe only a part of the touristic
road is scenic but the whole road (relation) may be of touristic
interest (for example a mountain pass road in the alps)
Is there a co
On 2 May 2011 09:03, Dave F. wrote:
> On 01/05/2011 20:50, Nic Roets wrote:
>
>> Note that open IRC is the Internet equivalent to the town hall
>> meetings.
>>
>
> No, it's not. Those occur in the time zone of the those involved.
>
> IRC meetings, on the other hand, occur outside of many OSM user
On 01/05/2011 20:50, Nic Roets wrote:
Note that open IRC is the Internet equivalent to the town hall
meetings.
No, it's not. Those occur in the time zone of the those involved.
IRC meetings, on the other hand, occur outside of many OSM users
waking/working day.
This is another reason for th
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Nic Roets wrote:
> Now let me give it a try: I think the OSMF should make (more) use of
> polling. Not for everything. But once or twice a year would be a nice
> way to involve the community.
Dear Nic,
Do it. Really. If you see a topic that needs a poll, add one
Elizabeth,
I don't see David's comments as constructive. Terms like "consulting
the community" is quite vague and Steve has said that many of his
prior efforts to consult the community end in flame wars.
Now let me give it a try: I think the OSMF should make (more) use of
polling. Not for everyth
Frederick, I think you are right, and we need to find a sane way of doing things
as you put it. In this case, it would have worked well to put a message on this
mailing list saying that the strategic working group exists, they are charged
with looking after the OSM logo among other things, and the
thank you Frederik
== Mikel Maron ==
+14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
From: Frederik Ramm
To: David Murn
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Sun, May 1, 2011 5:21:53 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] New Logo in the Wiki
Hi,
David Murn wrote:
> Unfortunately, being
+1
Regards,
Gert Gremmen
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Elizabeth Dodd [mailto:ed...@billiau.net]
Verzonden: Sunday, May 01, 2011 4:51 AM
Aan: talk@openstreetmap.org
Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk] New Logo in the Wiki
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 19:31:13 -0700 (PDT)
Mikel Maron wrote:
> David,
Elizabeth Dodd writes:
> ... you make major decisions behind closed doors ...
Have you knocked on the door and asked to be let in?
Nobody who is whinging has answered that question. Obviously, because
they haven't. Easier to whinge than actually do work.
--
--my blog is athttp://blog.russn
If you wanna critize SWG/OSMF *again*, please, create new thread but
don't spam this one. I know there is lot of desire to express pain how
communication doesn't work between some very loud minority and OSMF,
but please, do it properly.
About logo - new version looks excellent in high resolution,
2011/5/1 Ilya Zverev :
> I guess, the old logo should remain for low zooms (favicons, for example).
I agree and would go even further: the new "logo" is actually a clip
art, nicer to have it on the website, but not really suitable as a
"logo". The old one instead is more logo-like (even if it too
Frederik Ramm wrote:
> It would be great if we could somehow reboot and arrive at
> something sane again.
Superb posting. +1 to all of that.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/New-Logo-in-the-Wiki-tp6319413p6321156.html
Sent from the General Discuss
Hi,
David Murn wrote:
Unfortunately, being involved in an OSMF (or SWG, LWG, DWG, etc) meeting
isnt as easy as 'just showing up'. Infact, its not even really possible
to be invovled by reading the minutes or the meeting notes. Those of us
who wish to be involved, join public discussions and fo
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 09:40:39PM +, j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
> I assume that the "twice a year change" and the "funny, alliterative
> animal names" are references to Ubuntu Linux. Note that, while each
> release of Ubuntu has its own name, the Ubuntu logo has remained
> unchanged for year
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 02:32:34PM -0700, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> Jochen Topf wrote:
> > Don't be so hard on the Strategic Working Group. After months of talks
> > they have actually done something! I think we should celebrate that!
> > After dipping their toes into many important subjects fo
Andreas Perstinger wrote:
Is the current logo change a major decision for you?
See also Robert's comparison:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Oldtonew_logo.gif).
Actually it just highlights all of the problems nicely. Having been required to
comply with the needs of the visually impair
16 matches
Mail list logo
