Hi everyone,
Did someone took a look to the new Geoportal from the Brussels region?
http://www.cirb.irisnet.be/fr/blog/2014/03/un-geoportail-cela-vous-inspire
It seems they link to more open data than the Urbis building shapes we have.
For example, if I search for transport in the catalogue, I
Replying to Glenn below, pretty colors on the map are pretty but I
think there is more important.
The most important in my eyes is the number one OSM application: OSM
GPS routing.
Not sure what you are cracking down (or not ), perhaps you missed the
bit where I said I was in sinner mode
Thanks Marc.
I don't use the both tagging in the same time
I have seen also both methods and no recommandations in the wiki of OSM.
This was the raison of the question...
Kind regards.
__Eddy__
Le 4 mars 2014 16:14, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com a écrit :
My preferred way of working: on the
Could you give some visual examples, maybe temporarily creating them in
OSM ( deleting them afterwards) to clarify what you mean?
Dave F.
On 09/03/2014 22:26, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
On 9 March 2014 10:30, Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com wrote:
for some time now I have been working on the
Dave F. wrote:
Could you give some visual examples, maybe temporarily creating them
in OSM ( deleting them afterwards)
... or on the dev server:
http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/
Cheers,
Andy
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On 09/03/2014 12:21, Richard Z. wrote:
the same conceptual problem exists with pylons where they are shared by two
bridges
or aerial tramways. Actualy every pylon breaks the rule by definition because it
connects ground with layer=0 with something else at a different level.
How do you want to
On 09/03/2014 14:45, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2014-03-09 13:17 GMT+01:00 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com
mailto:dave...@madasafish.com:
it says which object is above and which below when they cross,
it is not only for rendering
I agree it does say which object is above
2014-03-11 15:52 GMT+01:00 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
I agree it does say which object is above another. For the benefit of the
renderer. Who else needs that data? Certainly not routers.
well, everybody who tries to understand what this specific part of the map
represents will have to
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 02:51:23PM +, Dave F. wrote:
On 09/03/2014 12:21, Richard Z. wrote:
In practice this rule is broken more often than you would think: Hamburg is
full
of waterways connected with roads on bridges through a tag obstacle. France
is
full of bridges sharing a node
Richard Z. schrieb:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 12:34:31PM +, Dave F. wrote:
On 09/03/2014 12:24, Richard Z. wrote:
it says point, not node the difference probably needs to be emphasized
very strongly. There is a difference between mathematicaly precise and
intuitive formulations:((
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 10:26:59PM +, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
On 9 March 2014 10:30, Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com wrote:
for some time now I have been working on the wiki page to state the rules
as clearly as possible.. hope that most of the improvements are fairly
uncontroversial.
It looks like the MapQuest Open tiles haven't updated since the
beginning of February. I narrowed the last update down to sometime
between https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/20325021 (Feb 1, 10 PM)
and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/20340010 (Feb 2, 7 PM)
Does anyone know what's
See this tweet I got back from them asking the same question:
https://twitter.com/MapQuestTech/status/436876342861512704
-James
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On 03/11/2014 05:12 PM, James Mast wrote:
See this tweet I got back from them asking the same question:
https://twitter.com/MapQuestTech/status/436876342861512704
-James
Thanks, that explains it.
--Andrew
___
talk mailing list
Hi,
this caught my attention some time ago:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/307673868
we could not figure out how it happened and what it was originaly. It seems
none of the validators complains about the existence of such nodes so this
may be an isolated mishap or a widespread problem.
You can safely remove it/them. You could also reuse it, but there is no
point why you would do that, unless you figure out what the original mapper
tried to add to the map by resurveying the area.
Polyglot
2014-03-11 23:40 GMT+01:00 Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com:
Hi,
this caught my
On 11/03/2014, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 09/03/2014 14:45, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
For instance if you had an area tagged 'park' another area
within it tagged 'lake' you could add a 'layer' tag to 'lake'
to ensure the render displayed it.
[...]
Which
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 02:52:02PM +, Dave F. wrote:
On 09/03/2014 14:45, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
+1, but adding a layer=1 to a lake in a park isn't clearer or more
accurate, they are both on the same layer, the lake is in the
park, not above (usually).
Which confirms my point
It was probably a member of a way that got removed. Maybe they forgot to
add the odbl tag to the way. Or it really wasn't clean. Hard to figure out
at this point.
But yeah, feel free to remove it. I know JOSM automatically removes the
odbl tag on any modified objects on upload. P2 and iD might as
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 06:32:01PM -0500, Toby Murray wrote:
It was probably a member of a way that got removed. Maybe they forgot to
add the odbl tag to the way.
that was our idea but the OSM Inspector or some other tool would have warned
about that case.. so a little mystery.
I am not
Linking Melbourne Authority have now added the attribution to the map (it is a
little 'i' above the legend, that upon clicking expands to show the
attribution.)
- Original Message -
From: stev...@email.com
Sent: 03/11/14 03:32 PM
To: Leon Kernan
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Growth in OSM
--mapid não existe
Para family-id e product-id, tem algo em específico para serem 335?
Tirando isso, o de SP está aqui:
http://naoliv.iq.unesp.br/mapas/gmapsupp.img
___
Talk-br mailing list
Talk-br@openstreetmap.org
Hum, agora entendi assim:
As tags das vias (oneway, destination, etc.) são atualizadas quando o sentido
da via é invertido. Porém, o mesmo não acontece com as tags de seus nós (como
semáforos e radares), que devem ser revisadas manualmente.
From: fernando.treb...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 10 Mar
Pode não ser culpa do algoritmo. Pelos sintomas, julgo que o OsmAnd esteja
colocando um peso muito alto para vias de alta classe.
Quanto ao algoritmo de roteamento, se referes ao Dijkstra, ele deve ser
bastante alterado para resultar em uma aplicação prática em GPS. Na minha
implementação no
Exatamente. :D
E esse é um dos motivos apontados pra não se usar a tag
traffic_signals:direction: porque é bem provável que o mapeador
esqueça de atualizar essa informação. Mas enfim, não há uma proposta
vencedora sobre esse assunto ainda. (Na verdade, essa tag não passou
por votação, não poderia
335 é o código IBGE para SP. Na verdade 35. O 3 a mais seria região
sudeste. Isso é para nos certificar de que não haja colisão de IDs caso o
usuário instale mais de um mapa. O do RJ é 333. Mas esse código poderia
ser qualquer um que quiséssemos inventar, desde que seja único.
Colocarei um
Perdida na página 4 a explicação que eu sempre procurei:
Oito são os argumentos dos quais faz uso a
Empresa Brasileira de Correios e Telégrafos para negar acesso
à base de dados de Códigos de Endereçamento Postal: (1) o
direito de exploração mercantil da informação que lhe conferiria
a Lei
Também utilizo nomes populares. Em Natal nunca vi nomes oficiais em
paradas, mas utilizo nomes como Reitoria, Natal Shopping, Midway
Mall, Neópolis, etc, porque são assim que as paradas são chamadas por
todos. Já vi algumas ferramentas para gerar diagramas de linha de rotas de
transporte público
2014-03-11 16:47 GMT-03:00 Thiago Marcos P. Santos tmpsan...@gmail.com:
Concordo. Eu usaria loc_name neste caso.
Mas da mesma forma, faz sentido ter um *_name sem ter name?
De forma muito simplista, todos os *_name são alternativas ao name.
___
Em Belo Horizonte, as maiores paradas - ao menos as que dispõem de abrigo -
todas têm nome oficial.
Em 11/03/2014 16:53, Erick de Oliveira Leal erickdeoliveiral...@gmail.com
escreveu:
Acho q isso ta ficando burocrático demais. Paradas não costumam ser
nomeadas pelo estado, ou costumam? E mesmo
Em Belo Horizonte, as maiores paradas - ao menos as que dispõem de abrigo
- todas têm nome oficial.
Sim, este é o meu caso.
Não cheguei a responder antes, mas concordo que nesse caso o nome deve ser
colocado na etiqueta name.
Em 11 de março de 2014 16:57, Vítor Rodrigo Dias
Aqui no RJ somente as paradas dos BRS [1] são nomeadas.
1: http://www.rioonibus.com/categoria/brs/
[]s
2014-03-11 16:59 GMT-03:00 John Packer john.pack...@gmail.com:
Em Belo Horizonte, as maiores paradas - ao menos as que dispõem de abrigo
- todas têm nome oficial.
Sim, este é o meu caso.
Acho q a proposta de note e name fica bom.
Em 11/03/2014 17:35, Raffaello Bruno Limongi Freire
raffaellobr...@hotmail.com escreveu:
*todos os *_name são alternativas ao name*
Realmente.
Mas a impressão que eu tenho (claro que posso estar errado) é que, quando
se deixa name em branco e se
Existem alguns casos em que não tem problema colocar um nome não oficial na
etiqueta name.
Mais precisamente, nos casos em que se alguma pessoa regular olhar aquele
nome no mapa, não reconheceria o lugar.
Neste caso, o nome oficial iria para outras etiquetas como alt_name e
official_name.
Por
O, I didn't realize you were creating those maps from raster sources. This
explains why they look this way. You're right. TM2 won't help you with
raster sources. You'd have to use just good old Tilemill 1 for them. I can
provide free Mapbox hosting for OSM tracing maps if this is interesting.
Just
Entendido
Em 11 de março de 2014 21:29, Nelson A. de Oliveira nao...@gmail.comescreveu:
Só para complementar: o aviso não diz que o rio inteiro deve ter
tunnel=*, mas apenas para verificar o layer negativo dele e, onde
necessário, colocar tunnel ou bridge nas vias que cruzam com ele (e
2014-03-11 21:25 GMT-03:00 Erick de Oliveira Leal
erickdeoliveiral...@gmail.com:
Ah Nelson, também acho que ele não devia dizer que está errado uma hidrovia
conter -1 como layer, mas não ter tunnel. Ou estou errado?
As pessoas colocam os rios com layer negativo apenas para não
conflitarem com
Nelson, na cidade de Belém verifiquei o nome entroncamento, seria
interessante marca-lo como genérico no seu validador ;)
___
Talk-br mailing list
Talk-br@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
Sugestão: usar o imgur.com pra subir a imagem e só postar o link
dentro da mensagem, assim evita esse problema (e outros).
2014-03-11 15:09 GMT-03:00 Vitor George vitor.geo...@gmail.com:
Pessoal,
Tentem mandar imagens menores ao responder, quase todas as mensagens deste
thread estão caindo na
Valeu!
Em 11 de março de 2014 21:25, Nelson A. de Oliveira nao...@gmail.comescreveu:
2014-03-11 21:23 GMT-03:00 Erick de Oliveira Leal
erickdeoliveiral...@gmail.com:
Nelson, na cidade de Belém verifiquei o nome entroncamento, seria
interessante marca-lo como genérico no seu validador ;)
2014-03-11 21:23 GMT-03:00 Erick de Oliveira Leal
erickdeoliveiral...@gmail.com:
Nelson, na cidade de Belém verifiquei o nome entroncamento, seria
interessante marca-lo como genérico no seu validador ;)
Certo.
Estou esperando duas coisas serem corrigidas no JOSM e tenho mais
algumas coisinhas
Ah Nelson, também acho que ele não devia dizer que está errado uma hidrovia
conter -1 como layer, mas não ter tunnel. Ou estou errado?
Em 11 de março de 2014 21:23, Erick de Oliveira Leal
erickdeoliveiral...@gmail.com escreveu:
Nelson, na cidade de Belém verifiquei o nome entroncamento, seria
On 2014-03-10 16:37, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am 10. März 2014 16:19 schrieb Ralf GESELLENSETTER r...@gmx.de:
ich habe mir gerade einmal angeschaut, wie der Passauer Stefansdom
getaggt ist. Die Türme sind z.B. einfach in das Kirchenschiff
hineingestellt, offenbar braucht man für
On 2014-03-10 16:45, Ralf GESELLENSETTER wrote:
Hallo Peter, hallo Liste
Was mich auf der anderen Seite auch beschäftigt, ist die Frage möglichen
Missbrauchs der 3-D-Gebäudedaten in Städten, die flächendeckend erfasst
sind. Detailierter und zielführender
als z.B. bei Streetview kann ein
Guten Morgen,
in den meisten 3D-Rederings fällt mir auf, dass die Straßenlaternen
(klassisch aus Gusseisen) nicht so recht in die Stadtlandschaft von
Bielefeld passen ;)
Im Wiki steht noch nicht viel dazu, aber unter taginfo finde ich neben
lamp_type (bezieht sich mehr auf die Beleuchtungsart:
On 2014-03-11 10:23, Ralf GESELLENSETTER wrote:
Guten Morgen,
in den meisten 3D-Rederings fällt mir auf, dass die Straßenlaternen
(klassisch aus Gusseisen) nicht so recht in die Stadtlandschaft von
Bielefeld passen ;)
Im Wiki steht noch nicht viel dazu, aber unter taginfo finde ich neben
Am 11. März 2014 10:23 schrieb Ralf GESELLENSETTER r...@gmx.de:
Die Düsseldorfer habe ihr eigenes Schema dazu:
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/lamp_model%3Ade#values
Das geht etwa in die richtige Richtung, sollte aber internationalisiert
werden.
gibt es irgendwo eine Aufstellung,
Hi Ralf,
Ralf GESELLENSETTER schrieb:
Was meint ihr dazu?
es gab da vor kurzem ein nettes Proposal, das ein ziemlich detailiertes
Mapping der Laternen erlaubt hätte. Es wurde aber knapp abgelehnt:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/lamp
Man sollte also wohl dieses Proposal
Am 11. März 2014 09:44 schrieb Lars Schimmer l.schim...@cgv.tugraz.at:
Zur Farbe: das S3D Tagging ist nicht ideal dafür. Ich hab einfach die
vorherrschende Farbe grob getaggt je building:part. Man kann es weiter
aufdröseln, aber ich bin mir nicht ob der Sinnhaftigkeit sicher.
Ja, dieses
Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com writes:
Ja, dieses Farben-Mapping ist halt mal ein grober Ansatz um die Gebäude
überhaupt zu unterscheiden, aber die echte Farbe ist nicht fest sondern
hängt vom Umgebungslicht (Wetter, Jahreszeit, Luftverschmutzung,
Uhrzeit/Sonnenstand, etc.) ab,
Am 11. März 2014 11:00 schrieb Peter Barth osm-t...@won2.de:
es gab da vor kurzem ein nettes Proposal, das ein ziemlich detailiertes
Mapping der Laternen erlaubt hätte. Es wurde aber knapp abgelehnt:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/lamp
naja, das ging ja nicht um Lampen
Martin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
naja, das ging ja nicht um Lampen sondern um Leuchten (also das
Leuchtmittel), die Lampe (Fassung / Halterung der Leuchte) war das kaum mit
drin.
Ich stecke die Lampe in die Leuchte und nicht umgekehrt :)
Und ja, die Leuchte war da weniger erfasst. Aber über z.B.
Am 07.03.2014 20:52, schrieb Peter Wendorff:
Hallo Steffen,
ich weiß kein Tag dafür; eventuell muss man auch ein neues dafür
erfinden; aber eine Burg ist ein Gebäude (und ohne Gebäude keine Burg),
eine Ruine hat zumindest Reste davon (also meist zumindest Mauern oder
Mauerreste).
ich war mal
Am 11.03.2014 15:15, schrieb Caronna:
Am 07.03.2014 20:52, schrieb Peter Wendorff:
Hallo Steffen,
ich weiß kein Tag dafür; eventuell muss man auch ein neues dafür
erfinden; aber eine Burg ist ein Gebäude (und ohne Gebäude keine Burg),
eine Ruine hat zumindest Reste davon (also meist
Am 11. März 2014 15:15 schrieb Caronna eifelhu...@gmx.de:
ich war mal vor Ort!
Es ist noch einiges zu erkennen, viel mehr als in der Zeitung stand.
Reste von der Wallanlage sind deutlich zu erkennen.
Ich hab mal eine Foto bei Wikipedia reingestellt
+1, bei einer Burgruine ist davon
Am 11. März 2014 15:05 schrieb Peter Barth osm-t...@won2.de:
Ich stecke die Lampe in die Leuchte und nicht umgekehrt :)
OOps, wie konnte das nur passieren o_O
Du hast natürlich Recht.
Gruß Martin
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Am 11.03.2014 15:24, schrieb Peter Wendorff:
ich war mal vor Ort!
Es ist noch einiges zu erkennen, viel mehr als in der Zeitung stand.
Reste von der Wallanlage sind deutlich zu erkennen.
Ich hab mal eine Foto bei Wikipedia reingestellt
Link?
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huppenbroich
mit
Am 11.03.2014 15:48, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
Da es sich um ein Denkmal handelt wäre ein entsprechendes Tagging wohl auch
angezeigt (s. Wiki, es gibt dazu verschiedene Alternativen).
Ich werde mir irgendwann auch mal mein GPS schnappen und einmal
drumrumlaufen
Hier vor Ort ist auch ne
Am Donnerstag, 6. März 2014, 07:02:02 schrieb Elstermann, Mike:
Unter OSM-Buildings ist der Skizzenmodus wieder verfügbar. Hmm.
eindrucksvoll, vielleicht an manchen Stellen zu verspielt? Probiert es
einfach aus und begutachtet selbst. Und nicht vergessen - weit reinzoomen,
linke Maustaste
Come mappare un torrente (conosciuto ancora come tale) dove oramai non
scorre più acqua ed il cui letto viene utilizzato esclusivamente come
sentiero?
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Il 11/03/2014 07:54, John Doe ha scritto:
Come mappare un torrente (conosciuto ancora come tale) dove oramai
non scorre più acqua ed il cui letto viene utilizzato
esclusivamente come sentiero?
name=nometorrente
highway=path
dieterdreist wrote
visto che ci sono varianti sia con XXI che con 21 forse la cosa migliore è
inserire la variante come alt_name? Sarebbe un metodo per far funzionare
sia Nominatim che altri servizi, a prescindere se l'utente cerca con
numero arabo o romano.
Si parla spesso dei civici che
2014-03-11 18:21 GMT+01:00 Marco_T toto...@libero.it:
Si parla spesso dei civici che rilascera' l'ISTAT e delle modalita' per
l'import.
Onestamente non li ho ancora visti ma presupponendo che contengano anche
uno
stradario non ci si potrebbe allineare a questo in merito alla
dieterdreist wrote
non credo che sia l'ISTAT l'istanza determinante ufficiale a decidere come
scrivere il nome di una strada. Forse mi sbaglio, ma credo che siano i
consigli comunali a deciderlo. L'ISTAT può contenere errori come anche gli
altri fonti.
Sicuramente sono i comuni a decidere
Il 11/03/2014 21:39, Marco_T ha scritto:
Quindi gli archivi ISTAT dovrebbero raccoglie dati certificati dai comuni
secondo apposito standard.
Il problema è proprio quel 'dovrebbero' che tu stesso scrivi: quante
leggi disattese abbiamo? Quanti comuni si saranno allineati al
regolamento?
Om det går att passa ihop med mitt (obehagligt fulla) schema under våren så
är jag intresserad, men annars så delar jag gärna med mig av materialet som
jag postade länk till. Det går bra att ta hela eller delar om ni hittar nån
annan som vill hålla en workshop.
/Jonas
2014-03-11 11:04 GMT+01:00
Hola:
Preparando la importación de catastro de Alaró (Illes Balears) veo que
un edificio estaba etiquetado como power=sub_station. Ese etiquetado
está ahora cambiado a power=substation. Es un aviso a los
desarrolladores de cat2osm2 para que incorporen este cambio al programa.
Au scos orice urma de sina din tot parcul de cand a fost reabilitat. In
loc de trenulet pe sine acum e unul pe asfalt cum e cel din Sinaia...
On 11.03.2014 10:02, Strainu wrote:
Salut,
Azi mi-a sărit în ochi trenulețul din orășelul copiilor de lângă Sala
Polivalentă din București. Văd că a
Cool. Testējam.
2014-03-11 12:48 GMT+02:00 cuu...@gmail.com cuu...@gmail.com:
izskatās labi. Var staigāt pa ielām un bildēt POI un vēlāk tos iezīmēt
OSMā. To varēja arī līdz šim, protams: uzņem ģeoreferencētas bildes un
vēlāk zīmē iekšā. Bet ar mapillary visas bildes nonāk vienā čupā, var
http://www.mapillary.com/osm.html
Using Mapillary Photos
Mapillary allows the creation of derived metadata from our photos for the
purpose of contributing content to OpenStreetMap under the following
conditions:
Derived metadata must be published for the community and licensed under the
Open Data
dodal bych ze platim a nadale platit hodlam domenu opentrackmap.cz.
2014-03-09 14:47 GMT+01:00 Marián Kyral mky...@email.cz:
Takže ve zkratce: OTM běží ze setrvačnosti, nikdo se o to pravděpodobně
nestará a asi to ani nikdo nepoužívá.
Marián
Dne 8.3.2014 09:45, Petr Vejsada napsal:
Vyšla beta verze map1.eu. Viz můj blog: http://map1.blog.root.cz/.
Pavel
___
Talk-cz mailing list
Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
A jaké s ní máš plány? Mně se docela líbí mapa, kterou mají Slováci svou mapu
na freemap.sk.
Marián
On 11. března 2014 8:01:49 CET, Michal Grézl michal.gr...@openstreetmap.cz
wrote:
dodal bych ze platim a nadale platit hodlam domenu opentrackmap.cz.
2014-03-09 14:47 GMT+01:00 Marián Kyral
Bonjour,
Petit rappel pour ceux qui compte aller au SotM-EU mi-juin, l'appel à
conférence est encore ouvert jusqu'à la fin de la semaine :
http://www.sotm-eu.org/
Pour notre SotM-Fr il est encore possible de faire des propositions à
cont...@openstreetmap.fr.
Frédéric.
Bonjour,
L'assemblée générale de l'association OpenStreetMap.NC est programmée
pour le mardi 18 mars à 18h30 à l'Université de Nouville, dans la
cafétéria.
L’objectif de l’association est de promouvoir le projet OpenStreetMap
et notamment la collecte, la diffusion et l'utilisation de données
Hi,
I was just wondering how you get driving times in case you are driving from
a country to another with a different speed limit.
The osrm data get calculated with the lua profile where I can set the speed
for motorway. But this value is different for each country.
So how can i prepare date for
Hi all,
Today is the last day to book a discount hotel room for $139/night just blocks
from where State of the Map US will be held in downtown Washington, DC. This
rate is available if you reserve today, and for April 11-13. More details here:
http://openstreetmap.us/2014/02/hotel-discount-dc/
Please note that the hotel-provided link prevents you from booking nights
other than April 11th and 12th. You can get around this by going to the
hotel's normal booking site and using group code 577D.
e.g. To check in Friday, April 11 and check out Monday, April 14,
click
On 3/10/14 11:07 PM, James Mast wrote:
I know that in some states that we don't add the state
abbreviation (and use 'SR' or 'SH'), and other states we don't add
anything at all expect just the number.
I'm just curious if anybody thinks we should try to get them all
standardized on the
As Richard pointed out, we need consistency. Here in Kansas state highways
are generally referred to as K-xx however in OSM they are tagged with a
ref of KS xx because I feel like being consistent is more important than
how they look on osm.org.
And speaking of renderers, you will notice that the
On 3/11/14 7:04 PM, Peter Davies wrote:
I thought I would make my proposal stand out a bit more by adding words to
the title. :-O
There are some weird things, like Nebraska's state law that requires NDOR
to have a state road link to every community of a 100 people or more. I've
changed some
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014, at 06:04 PM, Peter Davies wrote:
Texas also has many weird qualifiers on minor state routes but as I've
never contracted there for 511 I'm not totally familiar with them.
Weird is a matter of opinion, but I only know of Farm Road (FM), Ranch
Road (RM or RR), Park Road
Getting to a finish on what has developed and exists regarding
shields (guessed/inferred to mean the active project MapQuest Open
uses) would seem to disambiguate that. It seems a tall order,
doable, but tall.
We currently contract with 12 state DOTs that include and are spread
between CA
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.netwrote:
On 3/11/14 7:04 PM, Peter Davies wrote:
I thought I would make my proposal stand out a bit more by adding words
to
the title. :-O
There are some weird things, like Nebraska's state law that requires NDOR
to
salut! nous partageons l'avis Kennedy! il est a tout fait evident que la
fierte se partage! nous devons plus que jamais determiner a remplir notre
noble mission! (COSMHANNE)
Le 10 mars 2014 21:33, Schneider kennedy Alcereste
kennedyzoepa...@gmail.com a écrit :
Salut à tous,
C-OSMHA.STM et
85 matches
Mail list logo
