[OSM-talk] Release openstreetmap-carto v2.27.0

2015-01-27 Thread Matthijs Melissen
Dear all, Today, v2.27.0 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet has been released and rolled out to the openstreetmap.org servers. Changes include: * The following tags are now rendered: amenity=food_court, amenity=doctors, natural=scree, natural=shingle, natural=bare_rock, leisure=water_park, le

Re: [OSM-talk] [Imports] amenity=bicycle_repair_station :::: only 18 so far

2015-01-27 Thread Peter Wendorff
Hi, Adding option 4, already used on many other imports: Use some externa repository for manual checkup, as done e.g. for fuel stations [1], where the list of fuel stations was spread via wiki and some other tool I don't recall exactly. This allows to verify the progress (let importing users add

Re: [OSM-talk] amenity=bicycle_repair_station :::: only 18 so far

2015-01-27 Thread Andreas Goss
With only 50 some nodes, it is hard to argue for rendering. I don't think rendering is important here. What would be much better is a very simple smartphone app just to find the nearest one and then also just integrate it in all the existing bicycle maps. __ openstreetmap.org/user/And

Re: [OSM-talk] Error when Exporting from Share icon

2015-01-27 Thread Peter Wendorff
Hi, What if the osm website would allow "custom renderings" within predefined zoom levels by default, stitching together existing tiles in that case, which should require much less resources than a complete custom render, even when cutting down to non-tile boundaries. For current browsers it shou

Re: [OSM-talk] Addresses interpolation

2015-01-27 Thread Sylvain Maillard
Hi, by looking at the point with wrong street name, I can tell you that the last contibutor is (now) one of the most experienced contributors in France. I'm not sure where the error come from, but I would say it was one error among other good changes ;) I will send him an email about this error .

Re: [OSM-talk] [Imports] amenity=bicycle_repair_station :::: only 18 so far

2015-01-27 Thread colliar
Am 27.01.2015 um 08:43 schrieb Paul Johnson:> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:27 AM, JB > wrote: > > Le 26/01/2015 17:59, Jo a écrit : > > It would indeed be preferable to use OSM Notes for that purpose. > > Ho crap. Instead of importing 500 low-quality POI, jus

Re: [OSM-talk] Addresses interpolation

2015-01-27 Thread Dmitry Kiselev
>...and leave that editor free to make the same mistake again and again. >They probably didn't realise they'd made a mistake, and a friendly note >from you might stop the problem occurring again. > >Also, while they're correcting the mistake they've made, they may also >spot places in the same ar

Re: [OSM-talk] Addresses interpolation

2015-01-27 Thread Jonathan Bennett
On 27/01/2015 10:24, Dmitry Kiselev wrote: > >> Have you asked cquest, the editor who created it? They're the best >> person to answer this question. > > I have a validator or at least addr:interpolation parser, so I have a > lots of examples like this > made by different editors. > > So, if it'

Re: [OSM-talk] Quay

2015-01-27 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
(This discussion originated on talk - crossposted to tagging on Malcolm's suggestion) On 26/01/2015 21:16, Malcolm Herring wrote: On 26/01/2015 19:23, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Harbour#Quay mentions that "a quay will normally be tagged as par

Re: [OSM-talk] Addresses interpolation

2015-01-27 Thread Dmitry Kiselev
> Have you asked cquest, the editor who created it? They're the best > person to answer this question. I have a validator or at least addr:interpolation parser, so I have a lots of examples like this made by different editors. So, if it's not an local trait, it's much more easy for me to jus

Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Re: [Imports] amenity=bicycle_repair_station :::: only 18 so far

2015-01-27 Thread Paul Johnson
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:40 PM, SomeoneElse wrote: > On 26/01/2015 19:19, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > >> >> 2) Nobody seems to mind if a school POI is off by 30 meters. But the >> people do seem to care for bicycle repair stations. >> >> > Citation needed, I think. That may be true in the US (were