Re: [OSM-talk] Compression on Overpass API

2016-11-09 Thread Adrian
On Sun, 6/11/16, Dave F wrote: > Do you have a link to the weeklyOSM article? http://www.weeklyosm.eu/archives/8214#wn326_13274 (Unfortunately it seems the only way to find these links on weeklyOSM is by inspecting the HTML code of the page.) ___ tal

Re: [OSM-talk] Taglists support for rendering examples

2016-11-09 Thread Jochen Topf
On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 03:44:56PM +0100, Jochen Topf wrote: > On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 02:22:26PM +0100, nebulon42 wrote: > > Both notations are correct and I have deliberately chosen the latter > > one. The first one may be the right one for the problem you are trying > > to solve. For the problem

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetView name change

2016-11-09 Thread Craig Wallace
On 2016-11-09 13:47, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote: El onsdag 9. november 2016 13.36.11 CET Craig Wallace escribió: Is it just for streets? Or can you add photos of footpaths, cyclepaths, railways, rivers etc. Or any other feature you can travel along. Why not have a name with less focus on streets?

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetView name change

2016-11-09 Thread Celine Jacquin
ask > > if you had any suggestions for a new name for OSV? > > > > Thanks for your support and happy capturing / mapping, > > > > Martijn + the OpenStreetView team > > > > ___ > > talk

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetView name change

2016-11-09 Thread Iván Sánchez Ortega
El onsdag 9. november 2016 13.36.11 CET Craig Wallace escribió: > Is it just for streets? Or can you add photos of footpaths, cyclepaths, > railways, rivers etc. Or any other feature you can travel along. > Why not have a name with less focus on streets? For the same reason OpenStreetMap has footp

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetView name change

2016-11-09 Thread Craig Wallace
On 2016-11-08 15:34, Martijn van Exel wrote: Hi all, A few months ago, we started with OpenStreetView, the free and open street level imagery project made 100% for OSM with apps for Android and iOS. Since then, we not only have collected almost 30 kilometers of coverage, but also received a

Re: [OSM-talk] Use policies update

2016-11-09 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2016-11-06 0:25 GMT+01:00 Simon Poole : > Historically using CC by-SA for the tiles had a certain logic, as the data > used that licence and while there was a cloud of uncertainty how that would > apply to OSM data, you could reasonably argue that the tiles were a > derivative and had to be licens

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetView name change

2016-11-09 Thread Frank Villaro-Dixon
On 16-11-08 19:13:34, Joseph Reeves, wrote 3.9K characters saying: How about just StreetScape? I would argue against this. To me, "OpenStreetView" sounds okay in non-english languages (Spanish, French, German), contrary to "StreetScape" which I imagine would be really strange for me to say t

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetView name change

2016-11-09 Thread Simon Poole
Streetscape is totally fine, if you just want to have the same problems again. Rough step by step guide to finding a workable product name: - don't do it in public - don't use anything descriptive - google for the name - do an exhaustive trademark search (or rather let your fav IP counsel do i

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetView name change

2016-11-09 Thread Michał Brzozowski
How about StreetOpenView? ;) Streetscape sounds fine to me, too. 08.11.2016 16:37 "Martijn van Exel" napisał(a): > Hi all, > > A few months ago, we started with OpenStreetView, the free and open street > level imagery project made 100% for OSM with apps for Android and iOS. > Since then, we not