Hello, same issue here: retagging a single, multi-purpose heavy rail line
(out of tens of similar others) to light rail (which it is not) so that
one data consumer picks up on it? That is blatant mapping for a renderer,
and was reverted by locals who actually have OTG knowledge (in this case,
your
sent from a phone
> On 25. Dec 2017, at 15:34, Ilya Zverev wrote:
>
> If you plan a route in one of 74 cities, it will suggest using a subway or a
> light rail network.
why not real rail as well? E.g. in Berlin it is much more convenient to take a
normal train from the airport (SXF) to the
sent from a phone
> On 25. Dec 2017, at 15:34, Ilya Zverev wrote:
>
> What I'd like to highlight, is that zero GTFS feeds were used for that. All
> the data comes from OpenStreetMap.
Ilya, it’s great to see intermodal routing implemented in maps.me.
Still this recent concerted action showe
Hi,
You might have noticed an unusually high attention to public transport mapping
in OpenStreetMap recently. There was a validator, a big proposal that got
rejected, and another one that isn't yet. You might have seen subway route
relations in your city edited, to better conform to the PTv2 sc
Thank you for cc'ing it. I didn't know of that topic.
> FYI: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam#User_description_and_diary_spam
> I'll cc the dev list in
> Regards, Maarten
Regards.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sérgio - http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/smaprs
___
On 2017-12-25 13:15, Sérgio V. wrote:
What a weird new zero edditting user added me as OSM friend. Specially
considering this morning.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/StonefireArms
Don't want firearms as Christmas gift. Not much to do with OSM. I
hope.
FYI:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w
What a weird new zero edditting user added me as OSM friend. Specially
considering this morning.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/StonefireArms
Don't want firearms as Christmas gift. Not much to do with OSM. I hope.
In Brazil we call such marketing advert "a shot in the foot" (sorry for the
p
On 24.12.2017 00:05, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
> I'm always wondering why people would wear a GNSS logger on the wrist,
> where the 70% water mass of the wearer's body is always shielding half
> of the satellites.
>
> On top of the head would be a much better position for the receiver,
> at least for the
8 matches
Mail list logo