Good news for OSM!
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Permissions/Strava
Also the Strava fork of iD might still be working. See
http://strava.github.io/iD/#background=Bing&map=17.00/-110.02947/53.27094
Hooray 😃
Cheers
pangoSE
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/General-Discussion-f5
On Friday 15 November 2019, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> > > there isn't OSM data in their dataset.
> >
> > And neither is there is my ocean data set - the OSM data set used
> > only contains land masses, my resulting data set (D2 in Rory's
> > terms) only contains oceans. So no OSM data in it.
>
Am Fr., 15. Nov. 2019 um 14:21 Uhr schrieb Christoph Hormann :
> On Friday 15 November 2019, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> > there isn't OSM data in their dataset.
>
> And neither is there is my ocean data set - the OSM data set used only
> contains land masses, my resulting data set (D2 in Rory's
Am Fr., 15. Nov. 2019 um 13:44 Uhr schrieb Joseph Eisenberg <
joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com>:
> I understand that training their algorithim ("AI") on Openstreetmap
> data is fine.
>
>
actually this is something I do not understand. What is called "artificial
intelligence" in this context is actually
On Friday 15 November 2019, Martin Trautmann wrote:
>
> No. Elementary logic does not apply for legal advice.
Thanks for putting it so bluntly - that is indeed an impression i often
get from discussions on legal matters in the OSM community. But as
said that makes this kind of discussion uninte
/>"I don't understand why it is being claimed that facebook ... is not
using Openstreetmap data."/
 The original claim was not about facebook "using" OSM data, it was
that a specific dataset was "derived" from OSM data. To use the cooking
analogy, a cake is derived from flour, oil, sugar, etc. I
I suggest that those that want to continue this discussion do so on the
legal-talk mailing list. It’s especially for discussing this level of detail of
license questions.https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/Â
You all are free to ignore my suggestion, it’s not made with any modera
On 19-11-15 12:38, Christoph Hormann wrote:
> Because the basis of most comments made does not seem to be the desire
> to neutrally assess the situation Rory presents here and its
> implications. This would usually go by considering what if Rory is
> right and data productions like this would
On Friday 15 November 2019, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> > From an engineering perspective the idea that adding OSM data can
> > create a derivative database but subtracting OSM data cannot does
> > not hold up of course. I can create a polygon data set of the
> > Earth surface (a simple rectang
Well it's quite obvious to me that for adding or subtracting you need OSM
data, so I have no doubts. it's like a cook recipe, if you don't have use
it, you won't get the end result without it, adding or subtracting.
On Fri, 15 Nov 2019, 11:41 Christoph Hormann, wrote:
>
> This realization (of th
I don't know anything about the legal aspects, but logically I don't
understand why it is being claimed that facebook releasing a list of
possible roads, which specifically excludes all roads in
Openstreetmap, is not using Openstreetmap data.
I understand that training their algorithim ("AI") on O
Am Fr., 15. Nov. 2019 um 12:41 Uhr schrieb Christoph Hormann :
> Because the basis of most comments made does not seem to be the desire
> to neutrally assess the situation Rory presents here and its
> implications.
> What it seems instead happens here is that people look at the situation
> and dev
(Deliberately replying to myself since this is not meant as a reply to
anyone specifically)
If i try for a moment to ignore the fact that this matter has
significant meaning for the OSM community and its social cohesion (the
social contract between mappers and data users etc.) this is actually
13 matches
Mail list logo
