Re: [OSM-talk] Editing wiki asks for confirmation code?

Hi Skyler, You can use any image hosting site to upload the image, and then post a link here. For instance: https://imgur.com/upload Michał On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 6:50 AM Skyler Hawthorne wrote: > I tried to post a screenshot, but the mailing list has a max size of 40 > KB, > which seems very s

Re: [OSM-talk] Removing all signposts from relations

On Sat, 25 Jul 2020 18:14:14 +0200 pangoSE wrote: > Hi > > Recently it was discussed whether to have signposts in route > relations. I suggest we delete them from all relations by running a > script. I se no loss of information doing that and a benefit to data > consumers wanting to sort and cal

Re: [OSM-talk] Removing all signposts from relations

The PTv2 schema says to put all the route ways first in order, then the bus stops in order. Maybe you can do a similar thing here and sort the route ways first and then the sign points. Get Outlook for Android From: Martin Koppenhoefer S

Re: [OSM-talk] Removing all signposts from relations

sent from a phone > On 25. Jul 2020, at 20:33, Alberto Nogaro via talk > wrote: > > So if you do so, information is indeed lost. > +1 > Otherwise I can’t see why should it difficult to data consumer to strip the > unwanted information before processing the route. > +1 > > > Unless

Re: [OSM-talk] Removing all signposts from relations

You could run a script to remove the signposts from the route relations. But, other than digging in the database history, there’s no script which could add them back (proximity of a sign to a route is not a valid criterion). So if you do so, information is indeed lost. Otherwise I can’t see why

Re: [OSM-talk] Removing all signposts from relations

On 25.07.20 18:14, pangoSE wrote: > Recently it was discussed whether to have signposts in route relations. > I suggest we delete them from all relations by running a script. > I se no loss of information It loses the information whether or not a route is signed at a particular signpost. Because,

Re: [OSM-talk] Removing all signposts from relations

Where was the discussion. Do you have a link? I think the relation of the 'route' should be purely the ways & if there's an actual requirement*, the signs should be included as a part of a super relation https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Super-Relation * Is there a requirement? Doesn't the

[OSM-talk] Removing all signposts from relations

Hi Recently it was discussed whether to have signposts in route relations. I suggest we delete them from all relations by running a script. I se no loss of information doing that and a benefit to data consumers wanting to sort and calculate the length and height profile of the relation which I

Re: [OSM-talk] Heresy - pure discussion

Looking at it from a TRA (Threat Risk Assessment) point of view OpenStreetMap is not totally dependent on one central database being up and working. The primary database is fed by edits but if the database happens to get encrypted by Malware the backup and copies are still there.  The tiles o

Re: [OSM-talk] Editing wiki asks for confirmation code?

This doesn't look like CAPTCHA. It's just a text box with the word "Confirmation Code". It still happens with all ad blockers off. There are no requests to Google hosts, or any other non-OSM hosts. -- Skyler On July 25, 2020 08:13:10 Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote: I would expect CAPTCHA. C

Re: [OSM-talk] Editing wiki asks for confirmation code?

I would expect CAPTCHA. Can you try with adblock disabled (including pihole, in-browser adblock, hosts file blocking etc)? (yes, we are using recaptcha - if someone is capable of working on switching it to something better - see https://github.com/openstreetmap/operations/issues/383 and https://g

Re: [OSM-talk] Heresy - pure discussion

And database size limit is just a start :) It is artificially limited to 1G of RAM. I am curious how long planet import with 1GB of RAM would run :) Jul 25, 2020, 13:31 by jwhelan0...@gmail.com: > And as we start to fill the database with buildings even those might not fit. > > Thanks John > > O

Re: [OSM-talk] Heresy - pure discussion

And as we start to fill the database with buildings even those might not fit. Thanks John On Sat, Jul 25, 2020, 05:19 Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote: > On 24.07.20 23:55, john whelan wrote: > > Microsoft SQL Server Express is a free limited version of SQL server > > that may well do for many users. >

Re: [OSM-talk] Heresy - pure discussion

On 24.07.20 23:55, john whelan wrote: Microsoft SQL Server Express is a free limited version of SQL server that may well do for many users. reading express edition limitations I see: * Maximum relational database size: 10GB That would only be enough for the smallest of OSM regional extracts .