based on empirical observation (the GPS tracks). Yes, there are
the boundary controversies etc, but fortunately they involve only a
part of the world. Summing up, there are no strong problems of trust
in OSM, while there are in Wikipedia, IMHO.
--
Fabrizio Giudici, Ph.D. - Java Architect
. :-)
--
Fabrizio Giudici, Ph.D. - Java Architect, Project Manager
Tidalwave s.a.s. - We make Java work. Everywhere.
weblogs.java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici - www.tidalwave.it/blog
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - mobile: +39 348.150.6941
___
talk mailing list
talk
at the left top corner in the home page the official
logo of OSM?) over the rendered maps? Thanks for any feedback.
--
Fabrizio Giudici, Ph.D. - Java Architect, Project Manager
Tidalwave s.a.s. - We make Java work. Everywhere.
weblogs.java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici - www.tidalwave.it/blog
[EMAIL
2008, Fabrizio Giudici escribió:
I've recently added support for OSM maps (BTW, it's the default
provider) in an open source mobile navigator that I've developed. I'm
guessing which is the best way to give credits to OSM in my
application
Well, the current CC license specifies
timestaps with a recorder track. It uses many
geodata sources including OSM. But it's not yet ready for production
use.
--
Fabrizio Giudici, Ph.D. - Java Architect, Project Manager
Tidalwave s.a.s. - We make Java work. Everywhere.
weblogs.java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici - www.tidalwave.it/blog
an
application where there will be travel planning, and it will also use
OSM. I think that this should be done locally, as others have
suggested (in my case I have a full fledged desktop application, so
there are no problems at all).
--
Fabrizio Giudici, Ph.D. - Java Architect, Project Manager
701 - 706 of 706 matches
Mail list logo